IF Clive Heath ("Why do hunters still continue to hunt?" Open Lines, January 7) has evidence of unlawful hunting with dogs, it is his duty to take the evidence to the police who have demonstrated their willingness to prosecute.

If he doesn't have evidence, why should he be allowed to make unsubstantiated claims of law-breaking against the hunting fraternity in the pages of our newspaper?

John Tanner, Henleaze.