BREAKING NEWS
 

'No new benefits to cyclists from BRT link' - campaigners

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Profile image for The Bristol Post

The Bristol Post

THE inspector at the heart of the public enquiry into the proposed BRT link donned his crash helmet and took a bike ride along the controversial route.

Christopher Millns, who has been hearing evidence from both sides of the argument over the last few weeks, got on his bike to see the proposed £50-million guided bus route from a cyclist's perspective.

  1. Left to right, Christina Lindsay, Christopher Millns, Mike Ginger, Bob Fowler, Terry Miller, Bruce Slattery and Martin McDonnell who are inspecting the Rapid Bus Transit route

    Left to right, Christina Lindsay, Christopher Millns, Mike Ginger, Bob Fowler, Terry Miller, Bruce Slattery and Martin McDonnell who are inspecting the Rapid Bus Transit route

After hearing six weeks of proof from promoters and objectors at the enquiry in Armada House, Mr Millns will eventually produce a report which could approve or oppose the scheme for the council.

Objectors have already raised concerns for cyclists on the route between Ashton Vale and the city centre.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013

Experts and representatives of cycling organisations have suggested that the buses would put off cyclists and many objectors have focussed on the harbourside as a key battleground.

In documents submitted to the enquiry, Mike Ginger, a former council Cycle Project team leader, said: "The calm and uncluttered ambience of this unique and historic harbour setting will be shattered resulting in a qualitative reduction in traveller and visitor experience."

He also questioned the general effect on cycling that the new buses would cause.

He said: "It is reasonable to argue that some existing cycling and walking demand will be 'choked off' as conditions deteriorate.

"If cycling demand falls by say a quarter, this would represent a health benefit cost of £8 million euros [£6.5 million] over 30 years."

In a separate document produced by the Bristol Civic Society, objectors said: "It is proposed that both dedicated BRT buses and regular buses run along the road that separates the new M Shed from the future Umberslade development on WappingWharf.

"We question the desirability of running large vehicles across the new southern entrance of the recently opened M shed."

Finally John Grimshaw, the former Sustrans boss who helped to found the Bristol to Bath cycle path, submitted his own suggestions.

He said: " The proposals cause severance and delay to existing routes, fail to enhance cycling or to provide a continuous route parallel to the BRT, and would, in my view, comprise a worse situation than walkers and cyclists experience at present.

"Overall the BRT provides almost no new benefits for cyclists, whilst at the same time causing considerable severance, delay and inconvenience to existing routes."

He added: "It cannot be desirable to promote an order, largely for the benefit of out-of-town travellers, at the expense of local people travelling by the most sustainable of methods - walking and cycling."

The enquiry is set to continue for another two weeks, with the inspector due to consider his findings and produce a report soon after. If approved, the guided bus route could be operational from 2015. It is still not clear whether bendy buses, double deckers or other vehicles will be used.

The Government has pledged £30 million towards the scheme, with the remainder coming from the four councils in the Bristol area.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for macadam212

    by macadam212

    Wednesday, December 05 2012, 11:08AM

    “BRT provides no benefits to anyone.”

  • Profile image for katachua

    by katachua

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 6:05PM

    “@WibbleBibble

    "Smoosername - for you have any evidence that Sustrans oppose this proposal?

    Grimshaw is an ex-Sustrans boss."

    Maybe Sustrans has realised that it's finally been sussed and put up a stooge to speak for it?”

  • Profile image for WibbleBibble

    by WibbleBibble

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 5:33PM

    “Smoosername - for you have any evidence that Sustrans oppose this proposal?

    Grimshaw is an ex-Sustrans boss.”

  • Profile image for smoosername

    by smoosername

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 5:01PM

    “There isn't a single organisation (and I'm including BCC!!) that have done more to prevent public transport being improved in Bristol than Sustrans.”

  • Profile image for sprintstar

    by sprintstar

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:40PM

    “@mark1864 Crazy isn't it? More trolls here than Norway.”

  • Profile image for BCFCfinker

    by BCFCfinker

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:37PM

    “"""A health benefit cost of £6.5million over 30 years' That's hardly even a drop in the ocean."""

    Who's figures are these and is this the benefit of putting this scheme in place.

    These are predicted figures. Anyone who knows how polititians massage figures, the basic rule of thumb is:
    If a benefit is claimed, inflate the figures.
    If it's bad news, inflate/reduce the figures depending on the political divide.
    If you're after something, reduce the figures.
    Etc.

    So if we look at the figure of 1 million pound, this is probably a conservative estimate and it's probably safe to double it for the actual cost.

    If we look at the 6.5 million pound figure, it's probably safe to half the figure (for the whole of Bristol and not this scheme).”

  • Profile image for sprintstar

    by sprintstar

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:37PM

    “@Erinaceus It looks like I am the least 'fanatic' here.”

  • Profile image for Gambit72

    by Gambit72

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:25PM

    “'A health benefit cost of £6.5million over 30 years' That's hardly even a drop in the ocean.”

  • Profile image for Erinaceus

    by Erinaceus

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:21PM

    “@SouthvilleDav

    Quite right too. I've always found that a few gratuitous insults always help the argument along.”

  • Profile image for katachua

    by katachua

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:15PM

    “@sprintstar

    "@katachua You have issues."

    Yes, I do have issues. You have a problem with that? I have issues with:

    Firstly, so-called sustainable transport charities which act solely in the interests of cyclists.

    Secondly, selfish idiots who applaud every penny of our money wasted on cycling but have no concern for pedestrians either on foot, or when they use public transport.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         

        Related articles

         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article