'A major cock-up': Tight squeeze bollards slammed by Weston drivers
Weston-super-Mare motorists are baffled by a council’s decision to install two traffic calming bollards barely wide enough apart to allow cars to pass through.
The yellow bollards, fitted in Moor Lane Bridge at the end of February, force drivers to come to a near standstill as they approach, and cautiously navigate their way through the gap.
-

The bollards in Moor Lane Bridge were installed to ensure height and weight restrictions are abided by - picture YouTube (Steve Crawford)
-

Some motorists resort to pulling in their wing mirrors while passing through the bollards - picture YouTube (Steve Crawford)
-

The bollards were installed at the end of February - picture Steve Crawford
A number of motorists are believed to have had their wing mirrors damaged or knocked off by the bollards, which cost North Somerset Council almost £10,000 to install.
Local residents have turned to Facebook to vent their frustration. Andrew Knight said: “Chaotic, damaging, trouble as lights go green both ends - why not put a height bar instead?
10% off hire prices on all equipment
Terms: Only valid with orders of 8 weeks or more.
Contact: 08455195266
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
“So many people have caught their mirrors - one lady had to reverse through causing damage to the whole side of her car!”
Meanwhile Georgina Hunt wrote: "I couldn't believe it last week. I understand calming traffic but it's slow enough on that bridge with one way traffic waiting for the traffic lights to change.
"I've only got a micra but it made me nervous god knows how bigger cars get through. The gap is ridiculous!!!"
Steve Crawford, who lives near Moor Lane Bridge, captured on video the problems motorists face. The clip shows cars screeching to a halt before slowly passing through the gap, while other drivers pull in their wing mirrors:
Mr Crawford told This is Somerset: “It’s a nightmare. It seems like an idea that has been thought up by someone who has not seen the bridge.
“It’s absolutely useless. Side mirrors on white vans and such are high enough that the bollards make absolutely no difference. I know people who have had their car wing mirrors taken off though.
“This is just such a major cock-up. It’s just not a good idea at all.”
Mr Crawford added: “I believe they’re supposed to be two metres apart but it appears they have measured them two metres from the centre of each bollard rather than the inside measurement.
“They’re narrower than a garage door. It’s beyond extraordinary.”
Mr Crawford said he takes an alternative route to avoid the bollards. “That’s more time and petrol,” he said.
“I’m sure I’m able to drive through them but it’s the time you waste waiting for people in front to get through.
“The traffic lights are on a timer and motorists gingerly approach the bollards, then by the time they’ve passed the lights go red again.”
Another video clip captured by Mr Crawford shows three cars struggling to make it through the bollards before the lights change colour:
“It’s just a bad idea, and completely unnecessary in the first place,” Mr Crawford said.
“It’s only a matter of time until someone crashes into the bollards and if you’re trying to pass through them at night, forget it”.
North Somerset Council says the bollards are necessary to ensure the 6ft 6ins width restriction and three tonne weight limit is abided by.
In a statement it said the road and embankments on the approaches to Moor Lane Bridge are “showing signs of serious wear and tear”.
Vehicles are failing to obey the traffic width and weight restrictions, the council claims, which is “adding to the deterioration of the road's condition”.
A spokesperson told This is Somerset: “We are monitoring the situation. Cars have to slow down to navigate but cars can get through but large vehicles can’t.
“We have CCTV cameras there to monitor the situation. We are aware of the issues some people are having”.
The spokesperson also said the emergency services had been consulted over the bollards and did not oppose them because they do not use the bridge due to the existing height and weight restrictions.
Mr Crawford noted: “Should they [the council] have any plans of repairing the bridge, there is no way that they'd be able to get road works vehicles or machinery on there past the bollards”.




16 Comments
View all
by CheddarNewbie
Monday, March 11 2013, 8:08PM
“classic - this will be number 2 in my list of idiotic traffic/road designs in the area. No. 1 is A371/A368 via Banwell.”
by TheSage
Saturday, March 09 2013, 11:26PM
“What a load of bollards!”
by Ciderhunter
Saturday, March 09 2013, 8:29PM
“If the loonies that came up with this idea were elected, the locals only have themselves to blame.”
by Bristolexpat
Saturday, March 09 2013, 2:10PM
“Agreed Lone Ranger, although generally its not because the Council have made it difficult to access.....or maybe it is.
I lose count of the hair brained schemes the various councils come up with nowadays.
Never anything new, just keep changing round whats already in place.
Keeps somebody in a job I suppose which is good news for them in these austere times........”
by Lone_Ranger
Saturday, March 09 2013, 1:54PM
“""What do emergency vehicles do should a car crash, pedestrian fall over, cyclist fall off etc....?
Are the paramedics to run the length of the bridge to give treatment?"
Yes - the same as they do every day of the week should the scene of an incident be difficult to access.”
by Bristolexpat
Saturday, March 09 2013, 1:29PM
“What do emergency vehicles do should a car crash, pedestrian fall over, cyclist fall off etc....?
Are the paramedics to run the length of the bridge to give treatment?
Maybe we can issue them with roller blades or something...”
by eyeopener
Saturday, March 09 2013, 12:42AM
“"A number of motorists are believed to have had their wing mirrors damaged or knocked off by the bollards, which cost North Somerset Council almost £10,000 to install."
Can anyone explain:
1) How can i cost £10,000 to install two posts.
2) Is this North Somerset Council's best use of £10,000 and most pressing priority?
Would it not be cheaper to dispense with the 'brains' behind this?”
by FromMendip
Friday, March 08 2013, 7:20PM
“The bollards may have been set too close together but I'm sure a lot of drivers could get through if they possessed sufficient judgement.
If the driving test included an element of manoeuvring the car through a tight space I'd estimate that at least 50% of those on the road now with full licences would have failed.
Some people seem to need a couple of feet either side of their car before they will attempt to drive through a gap. It's one of many examp[le sof an appalling standard of driving in this country.
Even bus drivers vary. I've seen some go through tight spaces easily whilst a following driver with the same type of bus will crawl through ot sometimes not even attempt it.”
by BlueFace
Friday, March 08 2013, 6:30PM
“Great,love it!
Get those silly big 4 x 4s off the road!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!”
by Stephen_L
Friday, March 08 2013, 4:11PM
“If the bollards are less than the road's width restriction apart, then the council could be legally liable for any damage to vehicles, with a specified width less than the road's width restriction.”