Max : 2°C Min : 0°C
This is Bristol
Villagers have launched a campaign to stop more than 10,000
homes being built on Bristol green belt.
More than 100 people packed Dundry's village hall to plan
their campaign against the proposals.
And they told council planners: "Keep your hands off our
green belt."
They vowed to fight "tooth and nail" to stop the proposed
new town, likely to be called Yanley.
"embedded=true&config=http%3a%2f%2fmedia.ThisIsBristol.co.uk%2fTSPlayer%2fJSON.aspx%3fid%3d5400%26embedded%3dtrue" menu="false" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" style="" src= "http://media.ThisIsBristol.co.uk/tsplayer/videoplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> Last night's meeting was organised by the newly-formed Dundry Residents' Action Group (Drag). It was launched last month after proposals were revealed to build 9,000 new homes on about 200 hectares of green-belt land in North Somerset, and a further 1,500 homes over the border in Bristol. The land stretches from the A38 at Dundry, near the Barrow Tanks, right down to the A370 Long Ashton bypass to Ashton Vale. The development, which is currently in the draft planning stages, would be built in phases over 20 years from 2011, to meet Government targets for new housing for the region's growing population. But at the heated meeting, residents told members of North Somerset Council's planning department that the green belt which separates its northern villages from Bristol must be saved. Bernard Thompson, 78, of Highridge Road, has lived in Dundry with his wife, Gill, for 34 years. He said: "I do not want to see the green belt swallowed up by housing – it is the last thing we have. They should keep their hands off our green belt." Other residents said they were concerned about the affect the extra development would have on local roads and that the area lacked the services and infrastructure needed for so many new homes. John Phillips, of Highridge Road, has lived in the village for more than 40 years. He said: "It already takes people hours to get into Bristol from out here – why is that going to be different when this new town is created?" Other residents said they had not been consulted on the blueprint and had only learnt about the proposal three weeks ago. David Nevitt, 45, of Ham Lane, Dundry, asked: "How can you justify building more than 10,000 new homes when the ones we have already are not selling?" And Geoff Nicholls, a 60-year-old builder from Bridgwater Road, said: "I was astounded when I saw the size of the proposed new town – especially as we had no advance warning about it." Jill Lax, a mum of three of Bridgwater Road, said: "We should fight this application tooth and nail." North Somerset Council head of economy and regeneration Marian Barber attended the meeting with colleague Joy Milsom, a principal planning officer for the authority. Mrs Barber admitted that not all residents had received information about the proposals for new homes but said the development was 'not a done deal'. She said: "We do not want to repeat mistakes of the past, where developments have been built which are remote or inaccessible, nor do we want to swamp existing services." "This land was identified by the South West Regional Assembly in the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) as an area for development." The Government is also proposing 9,000 new homes be built in South East Bristol, 3,000 homes at Hicks Gate, 10,000 homes in North and North East Bristol, 3,000 in Yate and 2,000 dwellings south of Bath. The RSS is also proposes that a further 9,000 homes be built in Weston-super-Mare. If the North Somerset development gets the green light it could include six new primary schools, a new secondary school, a link road between the A370 and A38, a railway station and park-and-ride site. Drag spokesman Debbie Nicholls said: "Unless we act now and fight this plan Dundry will lose its identity and become encased in concrete."
"embedded=true&config=http%3a%2f%2fmedia.ThisIsBristol.co.uk%2fTSPlayer%2fJSON.aspx%3fid%3d5400%26embedded%3dtrue"
menu="false" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"
quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" style="" src=
"http://media.ThisIsBristol.co.uk/tsplayer/videoplayer.swf"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
Last night's meeting was organised by the newly-formed
Dundry Residents' Action Group (Drag).
It was launched last month after proposals were revealed to
build 9,000 new homes on about 200 hectares of green-belt land
in North Somerset, and a further 1,500 homes over the border in
Bristol.
The land stretches from the A38 at Dundry, near the Barrow
Tanks, right down to the A370 Long Ashton bypass to Ashton
Vale.
The development, which is currently in the draft planning
stages, would be built in phases over 20 years from 2011, to
meet Government targets for new housing for the region's
growing population.
But at the heated meeting, residents told members of North
Somerset Council's planning department that the green belt
which separates its northern villages from Bristol must be
saved.
Bernard Thompson, 78, of Highridge Road, has lived in Dundry
with his wife, Gill, for 34 years.
He said: "I do not want to see the green belt swallowed up
by housing – it is the last thing we have. They should keep
their hands off our green belt."
Other residents said they were concerned about the affect
the extra development would have on local roads and that the
area lacked the services and infrastructure needed for so many
new homes.
John Phillips, of Highridge Road, has lived in the village
for more than 40 years. He said: "It already takes people hours
to get into Bristol from out here – why is that going to be
different when this new town is created?"
Other residents said they had not been consulted on the
blueprint and had only learnt about the proposal three weeks
ago.
David Nevitt, 45, of Ham Lane, Dundry, asked: "How can you
justify building more than 10,000 new homes when the ones we
have already are not selling?"
And Geoff Nicholls, a 60-year-old builder from Bridgwater
Road, said: "I was astounded when I saw the size of the
proposed new town – especially as we had no advance warning
about it."
Jill Lax, a mum of three of Bridgwater Road, said: "We
should fight this application tooth and nail."
North Somerset Council head of economy and regeneration
Marian Barber attended the meeting with colleague Joy Milsom, a
principal planning officer for the authority.
Mrs Barber admitted that not all residents had received
information about the proposals for new homes but said the
development was 'not a done deal'. She said: "We do not want to
repeat mistakes of the past, where developments have been built
which are remote or inaccessible, nor do we want to swamp
existing services."
"This land was identified by the South West Regional
Assembly in the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) as an area for
development."
The Government is also proposing 9,000 new homes be built in
South East Bristol, 3,000 homes at Hicks Gate, 10,000 homes in
North and North East Bristol, 3,000 in Yate and 2,000 dwellings
south of Bath. The RSS is also proposes that a further 9,000
homes be built in Weston-super-Mare.
If the North Somerset development gets the green light it
could include six new primary schools, a new secondary school,
a link road between the A370 and A38, a railway station and
park-and-ride site.
Drag spokesman Debbie Nicholls said: "Unless we act now and
fight this plan Dundry will lose its identity and become
encased in concrete."
by o, bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 2:13PM
“All these houses going up but all our well paid jobs are going abroad ?????”
by ow, Bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 2:11PM
“Limited Credibility, Thank you for taking the time for reading my message, I get the feeling that you detest it from your sarcastic message you left! I also get a feeling that my message must relate to you and I have offended you! well I am so sorry if I have.”
by Jacqueline, Bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 6:34AM
“Well put Steve from Southville. I agree entirely with you. For all those people out there thinking this is nimbyism - think again! I was born in Shortwood - a small country village that South Gloucestershire Council wish to destroy with concrete. I encourage all you people that live in the country to fight, fight and fight again against the concreting over of our greenbelt. Our country is small but beautiful - we are at great risk of covering the whole thing with concrete.”
by Steve, Southville
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 7:50PM
“Jeremy Gardner, BS5, Are you mad? What connecting infrastructure are you talking about? These are hundred's of acres of green fields. Surely the solution is to improve the infrastructure in places like Portishead and then expand them. That way you benefit both the existing inhabitants and the incomers. Your saying that we should give up on improving the infrastructure of existing towns and concrete over vast swathes of countryside instead. That's just barmy. One of the things that makes Bristol such a great place to live is the fact that we're surrounded by beautiful countryside, easily accessible from the city. Once it's all swallowed up in a vast urban sprawl then we may as well go and live in London or Birmingham. No bloody thanks. And let's face it - do you really, really think in your heart of hearts that the GOSW or the West of England Partnership are going to put in place adequate infrastructure before building these thousands of houses? Of course they're ruddy well not!! The South West Regional Spacial Strategy is the longest suicide note in history for our sub-region. It will alter the character of the West of England forever, and not for the better. We cannot and should not allow our conurbations to sprawl any further, in fact, if we were environmentally responsible we should be looking to limit our population growth and enhance our towns and cities, makling them more sustainable. Jeremy, if YOU really cared about the environment you wouldn't be championing this daft idea to concrete it over. Building on green belt is not "sustainable". I'm with the Nimby's on this one.”
by jane, bristol
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 7:16PM
“the dundry people should fight this and we should back them. the green belt should be potected.if we allow this to happen then whens it going to stop? when we join up to weston? i just hope my childrens children can enjoy trips out of our city into the courtyside.”
Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.
22 Comments
View all
by o, bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 2:13PM
“All these houses going up but all our well paid jobs are going abroad ?????”
by ow, Bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 2:11PM
“Limited Credibility,
Thank you for taking the time for reading my message, I get the feeling that you detest it from your sarcastic message you left!
I also get a feeling that my message must relate to you and I have offended you!
well I am so sorry if I have.”
by Jacqueline, Bristol
Thursday, August 28 2008, 6:34AM
“Well put Steve from Southville. I agree entirely with you. For all those people out there thinking this is nimbyism - think again! I was born in Shortwood - a small country village that South Gloucestershire Council wish to destroy with concrete. I encourage all you people that live in the country to fight, fight and fight again against the concreting over of our greenbelt. Our country is small but beautiful - we are at great risk of covering the whole thing with concrete.”
by Steve, Southville
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 7:50PM
“Jeremy Gardner, BS5,
Are you mad?
What connecting infrastructure are you talking about? These are hundred's of acres of green fields.
Surely the solution is to improve the infrastructure in places like Portishead and then expand them. That way you benefit both the existing inhabitants and the incomers.
Your saying that we should give up on improving the infrastructure of existing towns and concrete over vast swathes of countryside instead. That's just barmy.
One of the things that makes Bristol such a great place to live is the fact that we're surrounded by beautiful countryside, easily accessible from the city. Once it's all swallowed up in a vast urban sprawl then we may as well go and live in London or Birmingham. No bloody thanks.
And let's face it - do you really, really think in your heart of hearts that the GOSW or the West of England Partnership are going to put in place adequate infrastructure before building these thousands of houses? Of course they're ruddy well not!!
The South West Regional Spacial Strategy is the longest suicide note in history for our sub-region. It will alter the character of the West of England forever, and not for the better.
We cannot and should not allow our conurbations to sprawl any further, in fact, if we were environmentally responsible we should be looking to limit our population growth and enhance our towns and cities, makling them more sustainable.
Jeremy, if YOU really cared about the environment you wouldn't be championing this daft idea to concrete it over.
Building on green belt is not "sustainable".
I'm with the Nimby's on this one.”
by jane, bristol
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 7:16PM
“the dundry people should fight this and we should back them. the green belt should be potected.if we allow this to happen then whens it going to stop? when we join up to weston? i just hope my childrens children can enjoy trips out of our city into the courtyside.”