Campaigner photographs cyclists on pavements
A CAMPAIGNER championing a ban on cycling on pavements has captured culprits on camera.
Ruth Bailey, a member of Bristol Older People's Forum, believes the Haymarket is a hotspot for cyclists causing a nuisance on pavements.
The Post has previously reported that 70-year-old Mrs Bailey launched a campaign against the "blight" of cyclists using the pavement and called on other forum members to get involved.
She spent an hour outside Primark and Debenhams last Saturday afternoon and took pictures, seen by the Post, of 18 cyclists using the pavement during that time. Mrs Bailey said she also saw another six cyclists, whom she did not manage to catch on film, during her time in Broadmead.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013
Mrs Bailey, of Cotham, called for a crackdown on cycling on pavements after meeting a woman whose leg was broken when she was knocked down by a cyclist while waiting at a pedestrian crossing on Bond Street.
She said that it can sometimes be difficult for older people to move out of the way of cyclists on pavements.
"I am concerned about safety on the pavements," Mrs Bailey said.
"I am especially concerned about pedestrian areas such as Broadmead. Near Primark and Debenhams, cyclists come racing through where there are queues at the bus stops.
"When I was there on Saturday there was someone cycling one-handed carrying bags while on the phone.
"They weave in and out, and get so close to pedestrians. I have got an arthritic knee, and if you have got a stiff knee you may be able to see something coming towards you but cannot jump this way or that to get out of their way. It is the same for people who are blind or cannot hear very well."
City council spokeswoman Kate Hartas confirmed that the stretch of pavement outside Primark and Debenhams is not a shared space for cyclists to use.
"There is a cycle lane that goes through the side of Primark that is segregated," she said. "People should not cycle through Broadmead, as that is not a shared space because of the shoppers wandering around.
"Anywhere that is a shared spaced is marked in one way or another, whether it is road signs or plaques in the paving."
She said that in areas where cycling on pavements is problematic the police can take action, and the council had worked with them on enforcement of the law in the past.
Bristol Older People's Forum, which has also been backed in its campaign by East Bristol Advice and Information Centres, has invited representatives from Avon and Somerset Police and Bristol-based cycling charity Sustrans to discuss the matter.






Comments
by gentlegreen
Saturday, September 15 2012, 2:13AM
“Amazingly, all the cyclists in those photos appear to have their saddles set much too low - witness the two standing up to pedal.
They're in need of training if only to show them how to use a hex key.”
by beeman
Friday, September 14 2012, 6:46PM
“Absolutely loving the comments about how we should be thinking about things like third world poverty rather than pavement cyclists :D By that logic we should ignore petty theft and mugging as well because they're not quite as serious as global warming!
Larger problems require larger, often longer term, solutions that we must deal with together as a society. I'm sure that in the meantime there will be a few people left to deal with the smaller issues....I mean, when they're not out of the country protecting penguins or whatever.
Just because dangerous behaviour isn't the biggest problem in the world doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be dealt with. Start being realistic, and stop trying to find excuses!”
by solunga
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 1:55PM
“@Tody123
Thank you for the "it matters not what your opinion is" comment. Very helpful. Why all this hostility towards cyclists? What are really the biggest problems in the country? I would say overpopulation, pollution, inequality, expensive public transport and all the mistakes being made now by the older generation that the younger generations will have to pay for. I would say it does matter what my opinion is, as my children will be living here when I'm gone, and I love this city as much as anyone.
Would someone please reassure me that cyclists are valued, atleast for how much they cut down on traffic, pollution, road accidents and FirstBus' big fat wallet?”
by DM_Fishponds
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 6:45PM
“@ItIsntBristol – "Let's have a bit of perspective, shall we?"
Perspective is fine, I think everyone should be aware of problems in the big wide world.
However I would not expect to discuss nuclear war in the comments section of this story. Neither would I expect anyone obsessing about your list of problems to be too worried about cyclists breaking the law, but . . .
For those who are more concerned about getting to and from the local shops without breaking a hip; cyclists who think that they are saving the world and think that excuses them from acting socially and responsibly, might be more of a threat to their peace of mind, comfort and survival than the sun exploding sometime in their lifetime!
You're not by any chance a cyclist who thinks it's ok to ride on pavements are you?”
by ItIsntBristol
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 5:08PM
“Below is a list of things that are problems:
Cancer, losing a limb, sea levels rising and drowning anyone who can't afford a boat, meteors the size of Wales, Alzheimer's, deforestation, stokes, running out of clean drinking water, not having any clean drinking water in the first place, hurricanes, tornado's, tsunami's, nuclear war, civil war, genocide, rape, murder, racism, ageism, discrimination in general, the supervolcano lying dormant underneath the lake district that could erupt and annihilate mankind, losing a loved one, Iran, the sun exploding, and of course death.
Now here is another list:
Cyclists on pavements, having to take a union jack flag down, houses being built on land NEAR your house, £1 parking charges at Ashton Court, cars parking on pavements, pedestrianization of town centres, sticky-outy bus stops, the GBBN, I could go on and on and on and............
Let's have a bit of perspective, shall we? One of the above lists is full of real problems that could affect any one of us. The other is a list of inconveniences that probably only directly affect a handful of people.
Do you know which is which?”
by Big_Gregory
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 4:20PM
“DM Fishponds. As you probably know full well my comparison was made to highlight the fact that issues with cyclists are far less than the bigger problem of reckless and irresponsible drivers. The amount of stories in this paper about cyclists is so disproportionate to the issue in hand. If someone can provide a stat about how many people in bristol have been killed or seriously injured by a law breaking cyclist when compared to the number injured by cars I will take notice.
I don't agree with cyclists breaking the law and I hate to see it myself when I'm cycling. I just think the amount of anger and resentment towards cyclists is just ridiculously over the top in Bristol.”
by DM_Fishponds
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 10:08AM
“@Katachua - "How much of that money was spent on glossy brochures and jaunts to foreign cities, I wonder?"
Some of the cycling city money was spent on the 20 mph test zones which were a failure.
Average speeds reduced by only 1.4 mph and injuries increased.
The council would have us believe that this test was so successful it should be rolled-out to the rest of the city at an additional cost of £2.8 million!”
by katachua
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 9:56AM
“@DM_Fishponds
Are you saying that the £22.5 million that the council spent on 'Cycling City' was money well wasted?"
Well, clearly it was, because there are now more cyclists on the pavement, not fewer. How much of that money was spent on glossy brochures and jaunts to foreign cities, I wonder?”
by katachua
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 9:54AM
“Last weekend I took a walk along a path beside the Thames in Oxford (they call it the Isis, but that's not relevant).
Every cyclist who came up behind me had a bell, and used it to let me know he or she was coming. Cyclists approaching gave me plenty of space, as I did to them, and generally also a friendly greeting.
How very different from the Lycra louts in Bristol! "Feck of out of my way, you old winker" is more their style.”
by DM_Fishponds
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 9:15AM
“@CothamSteve - "If we had some half-decent cycling infrastructure here where people on a bicycle would be safely kept away from cars and pedestrians kept away from cyclists then everyone would be happy."
Are you saying that the £22.5 million that the council spent on 'Cycling City' was money well wasted?”