On the beat: Punishment for wasting the police and court's time
Last week I found myself having to attend Bristol Magistrates' Court in relation to an incident which occurred in March, whereby one of our police community support officers was verbally abused while attempting to speak with a male who had been cycling on the pavement.
Our witness warnings indicated that we were to be at the court for 9.45am, and on the day in question we made our way to the room set aside for police officers and witnesses, and waited to be spoken to by the prosecutor in the case.
At 10.30am, having spoken to the prosecutor myself, my police community support colleague and another officer who had been present during the incident, along with a public spirited independent witness who had travelled from outside Bristol to give evidence on our behalf, we waited to be called to give our evidence. At 11am I was informed that the defendant had yet to turn up for court. A little later, the prosecutor returned and stated that the defendant had eventually attended court and had now changed his plea to guilty.
Therefore, we were no longer required and so we made our way back to the station to start our own work.
Attending court and giving evidence is an important part of bringing offenders to justice, but I can't help but wonder how much time and money is wasted during this process. It is not the fault of the judicial service, as all cases need to be tried fairly and both parties are entitled to call various witnesses to support their respective versions of events.
But, in some cases, I believe that witnesses are called to see if they will actually turn up and be prepared to give evidence – once they attend and appear willing to stand up in court to explain what they had witnessed, the defence in all probability advises the client to plead to the offence. On that one day, along with myself, there were another 18 police officers sat in the witness waiting room having been required to give evidence in their respective cases.
I know that before I left, at least six of these were dismissed as being no longer required.
The judicial services should be commended for bringing cases to court a lot quicker than in the past. But I wonder if the defendants in these cases will receive additional punishment for wasting both the police and the court's time once sentencing is passed.
For the defendant in the case that we had been called for, his excuse for turning up over two hours late was transport issues in getting to court.











8 Comments
View all
by Jay, Horfield
Wednesday, December 23 2009, 8:11AM
“Cycling on the pavement an offence ?, will someone tell cyclists in this area that please.”
by richard, bristol
Saturday, December 19 2009, 10:18AM
“censored again.”
by Andy, Nailsea
Saturday, December 19 2009, 9:38AM
“Matt and Nathan - you are a pair of hoops. The PCSO was doing the right thing challenging the scumbag cycling on the pavement. It is his job to do so. He should not be subject to a volley of abuse for doing his job.”
by Nathan, Bristol
Friday, December 18 2009, 10:39PM
“Hmm, let me get this straight. A police officer was verbally abused and this went to court. It's quite obvious to me who is wasting who's time and money here?”
by matt, Bristol
Friday, December 18 2009, 1:28PM
“I feel sorry for the bike rider, why is it that yobs in neigbourhoods can scream abuse at all and when the police turn up they scream abuse at them and nothing happens.
I can picture it decent man riding bike gets dressing down from PCSO, when all around Rome is burning.
The police make criminals of decent people and victims of criminals and they wonder why the public has lost faith.”