Go before bailiffs arrive, council urges Occupy Bristol protesters
BAILIFFS could move in to evict protesters from College Green any day now – but the council is urging them to leave "under their own steam".
It is understood that Bristol City Council has applied to Bristol County Court for a warrant of possession, which will have been handed to the court's bailiff manager to fix a date for the eviction.
This follows a ruling made by a judge at the court on Friday that protesters at the Occupy Bristol camp should be forcibly removed if they do not leave of their own accord.
There were chaotic scenes at the court as a small group of protesters disregarded the ruling, asked police to arrest the judge, and "occupied" the court room for five hours before leaving later that afternoon.
Once bailiffs set a date, they will inform the protest camp, but they will not be informed of the date of the actual eviction.
Council spokesman James Easey told the Evening Post: "We do not propose to give a running commentary on the legal process going forward.
"As we stressed after Friday's decision, we appeal again to those in occupation now to respect the order of the court, and leave College Green under their own steam and avoid the use of bailiffs."
But it does not look likely that the protesters will leave before the bailiffs arrive.
Although a post on their website says they plan to leave, and one of the protesters Tony Cripps has said they will leave "within two weeks", the Dean of Bristol Cathedral, the Very Rev David Hoyle, says there may be a "division" in the camp about the issue of leaving.
After conversations he has had with them, he said some people wanted to go, but others wanted to "see it through to the bitter end".
He added that the "clock was ticking" if the protesters wanted to leave of their own accord, now that bailiffs were involved.
He said it was impossible to tell exactly how much the repair of the land would cost until the tents and structures were gone.
Tony Cripps, pictured, one of the protesters, said yesterday they were moving from "phase one" where they had occupied College Green to "phase two" where they would continue to protest, "take action" against banks, and move away from their city centre camp.
He said: "We are definitely going to be gone from College Green in the next two weeks."
The protesters were trying to leave College Green without costing the taxpayer "huge amounts of money", he said.
At a council meeting today, Mr Cripps will be provided with answers to questions he has submitted for consideration by council leader Barbara Janke on ethical banking.
He says she agreed to look into Bristol City Council's banking policies, and has asked her to provide an update on which "ethical" banks the council plans to use, and by what date. He has also asked her to consider using Bristol Credit Union.









18 Comments
View all
by Cider_Dog
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 1:14PM
“This eviction should be more entertaining than watching City at the weekend, I can't wait...”
by Pipsbeard
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 1:08PM
“I suggested that they use the democratic process if they wanted to change society, they didn't accept that line, told me it's corrupt, but then almost in the same breath proudly told me how they were going to get the council to change its' banking arrangements. So the group that doesn't accept the democratic process feels that it can influence an elected council, that is what I call muddled thinking!”
by Pogo_T_Clown
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 12:59PM
“The protestors are probably holding out to facilitate scenes of them being dragged off by brutal polcemen. Which is, ironically, exactly what I want to see”
by CurtisHewitt
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 12:52PM
“The protesters leaving peacefully are spineless. Not for leaving without a fight, but for allowing fellow protesters to drag their movement even further through the mud by resisting the bailiffs. If they really cared for the cause they wouldn't allow it to happen in their name.”
by steviebaby
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 12:39PM
“Well why are these people "negotiating" with my local Council, are they paying CT whilst sat on their backsides making a so called point about the banks etc. I couldn't care less who the council banks with. Move on & stop costing me money in legal fees & costs.”
by rocketbob
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 11:35AM
“Everyday someone on this web site has an issue with the Council. OK a lot of us are just letting off steam or starting a discussion.
It really annoys me however when protesters can camp illegally on a central civic place and NEGOTIATE on our behalf with our civic leaders.
Whats the point of having proper democratic channels,when it appears that if you break a law you have more credance with the authorities than anyone else.
Perhaps if the stadium/ anti stadium fans camped out next they may speed up the decision.”
by Spiggett
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 10:34AM
“-That was Peter Cook's "The Rise and Rise of Michael Rimmer"!
The Political Parties should actually be offering ALTERNATIVES (rather than bending over for the "Bankersters"...)”
by laner73
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 10:22AM
“I think I have worked out what Occupy's stage 2 is.
Tony Cripps is having meetings with Barbara Janke not to discuss banking ethics but with his past he is probably planning her kidnap and hold her to ransom to raise funds to reseed College Green or until she bows to his ways of thinking.”
by Commenter42
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 9:28AM
“And tens of thousands of £s would be wasted holding referenda.”
by Commenter42
Tuesday, January 17 2012, 9:25AM
“No, we shouldn't be polled to decide where the Council banks. We elect Coulcillors to take those sort of decisions. If a poll/referendum were to be held for every decision that some minority doesn't like, nothing would ever get done.”