This empty school bulding is absurd

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

School playgrounds in the Bristol area that have been deserted will again be filled with noise and activity on Monday when pupils return after the half-term break.

Except for one.

The playground surrounding the ornate Victorian red brick buildings in which generations were educated at Fairfield School will not echo to the clamour of children.

The place in which generations of Bristolians were educated is presently being used as a pupil referral unit and offices.

Meanwhile, nearby schools are over-subscribed.

More than 300 children have not been given a reception class place for September. The problem is most severe in the centre and north of the city, and there has been talk of four-year-olds having to be bussed to school.

Earlier this week, Bristol's education chief, Councillor Peter Hammond, attempted to quell alarm over the shortage of primary school places by issuing a statement which concluded "parents should be reassured that every child will be offered a place for September".

Oh, Mr Hammond, I truly wish that your words could reassure me.

But as a parent of two children living in north-west Bristol – a popular area of the city for families – I know how difficult it is to get a place at a decent local primary school from the experiences we had seven years ago when our eldest son was starting school.

Yes, that's right – seven years ago. Yet it looks as if the problems that existed then still haven't been addressed.

And in the meantime, the former Fairfield School building in Montpelier – which has been replaced by a newer, bigger school in Horfield – has become the elephant in the corner of the playground that the council prefers not to be reminded about.

But before contemplating the absurdity of a school building lying empty while primary schools nearby are having to turn away children who would once have qualified for a place, let's go back to 2002, the year in which my eldest son was to start school.

In that year, so many parents had their applications for places at Sefton Park School turned down that public meetings were called.

We had friends who had bought houses just streets away from the school who were understandably furious to find their children had been allocated places elsewhere. One family discovered they would have to transport their four-year-old to and from Millpond Primary on the other side of the M32.

Such was the outrage that a compromise was agreed whereby the usual two-class intake into Sefton Park was increased to three classes, and temporary classrooms were set up in the school grounds.

Unfortunately, this created problems of its own, which has made local parents fear the worst about plans to expand Sefton Park. As one friend whose child was in the 2002 three-class intake put it: "They've increased the number of classes – but not the size of the playground."

Cramming children into schools that don't have sufficient space is bad enough. But if we've reached the stage where the council is seriously considering bussing four-year-olds to school, then surely it's time to look at other solutions.

Many parents in north-west Bristol believed the shortage of primary school places could be addressed by turning the old Fairfield School into a primary school after the secondary school that had been there since the late 19th century closed to move to newly-built premises in 2006.

But instead, back in November 2005 an appraisal into uses of the old Fairfield School buildings was conducted for the council's Central Support Services department following questionnaires sent to nearby residents based, according to the appraisal, "on the reasonable assumption that it would be sold to a private developer for primarily residential use".

That, of course, was back in the days when the property market was booming.

Now it seems that this option is not being pursued, yet no long-term decision has been taken on the future of the old Fairfield School buildings – despite the lack of school places in the area being exacerbated by the decision in 2007 not to build a school on the Brunel site of City of Bristol College.

The council is said to be concerned about the limited outside space on the old Fairfield School site – even though it is apparently considered acceptable for children to be walked from Sefton Park to the Brunel site to use the playing fields.

For parents living nearby who have children starting school in September, however, there are more pressing concerns – such as whether their children will be among those who Mr Hammond says may be offered "practical free travel arrangements".

And for all of us in Bristol, there should surely be concern about the prospect of four-year-olds being bussed past the former Fairfield School, where there are now parked cars in the playground instead of children.

3
Tweet this article
Report

3 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Natalie, Horfield

    Sunday, February 22 2009, 10:32PM

    “I am a member of Bristol Primary Admissions Crisis group (B PAC) - We are concerned parents, with no school offers for September. We have all endlessly emailed, written and telephoned members of Bristol City Council, our local MP and ministers in government.
    Unfortunately, party politics is always the first thing they would like to inform us about.

    Personally, I have numerous issues with the way this crisis has been allowed to occur BUT.........
    I would hope those with the power to do something for us, would arrange to meet us to discuss solutions instead of blaming each other for the past.

    We need immediate temporary class provision with negotiations for longer term solutions e.g. in Bishopston, taking Council land back from Gloucester County Cricket Club and building the planned new 'Brunel' school.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Bob, Bristol

    Sunday, February 22 2009, 9:56PM

    “If Fairfield School, Fairlawn Rd, was good enough for the Redland Green children as a temporary site, when building was taking place in Redland....

    Surely, it is practical to use it again, as a temporary solution for primary children. This would enable time for a permanent building i.e. the new 'Brunel' School, Ashley Down Road to be constructed.

    What is the difference ?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by JohnPaul, Bristol

    Sunday, February 22 2009, 9:16PM

    “The Sefton Park parents and residents asked why Fairfield could not be used for a new primary school and were told that it would be too expensive to bring up to the standards now required by Health and Safety. And then we were told that the decision to expand at Sefton Park was not taken for finanacial reasons, but that it is "in the best interests of local children".

    Doesn't add up, does it?

    Every time this council has to make a decision it seems to make the choice that alienates and offends local voters.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters