Wrath of the Druids
DRUIDS and pagans confronted a team of archaeologists who arrived to disinter ancient human remains at Stonehenge this week.
An Aubrey Hole – one of a ring of 56 pits named after the 17th-century antiquarian John Aubrey and dating to the earliest phases of Stonehenge – was to be re-excavated under the Stonehenge Riverside Project.
-

This involves digs by a number of university departments around Stonehenge, and on the nearby Cursus, to find out more about these sites and their links with the monument.
This particular Aubrey Hole was originally excavated in the 1920s, and reopened and closed again in 1935 when it was thought nothing could be learned from the cremated remains found there.
But Druids were upset at the prospect of the bones being disturbed and perhaps not returned to their resting place.
I understand that one Druid group had been called in to bless the dig, but changed their mind, claiming they had been misled over the nature of the work.
ARCHAEOLOGIST, author and broadcaster Julian Richards, of TV's Meet the Ancestors fame, who was there to oversee the dig, found himself in the firing line. He told me: "It was actually unpleasant, because I don't like being told by Druids to be ashamed of myself, because I'm not.
"As an archaeologist, I treat human remains with respect. Some of the Druid community got hold of the wrong end of the stick. They thought the remains would be taken to a museum store somewhere forever.
"As an archaeologist, I think that should happen for study in the future. But what's likely is that the remains will be reburied, although this hasn't been decided yet.
"They will not be dispersed; they will be kept together and studied by someone who'll look at the physical side, and samples will be taken for radio-carbon and other analysis."
Modern scientific techniques applied to the remains could reveal a great deal about the people who built Stonehenge, said Julian. "We want to give these people from Stonehenge's past a voice," he added. In a touch of irony, King Arthur Pendragon, who unfurled banners linked to his protest to free Stonehenge from its current fence and visitor centre, reminded Julian of a statement in his Stonehenge picture book that advised Arthur to keep on protesting!
Druid Matthew Holbrook, of Timsbury, North East Somerset, who was on the scene, said: "As a group we know that science can be very useful, such as providing accurate dates of ancient sites and remains.
"What we don't accept is that human bones have to be taken away, possibly never to return.
"Portable testing equipment is now readily available and anything taken from the ground can be put back in the ground."
I can sympathise with both sides in this issue. If they can work together – as they have done notably at the Rollright Stones in Oxfordshire and at various sites in Cornwall – surely only benefits can come from the confluence of science and spirituality.
■ My thanks to Matthew Holbrook for the picture from Stonehenge on Monday – you can see more at his website www.handswithenergy.co.uk/events
MATTHEW Holbrook, Adam Stout and Dean Carter are the guests on my Mysterious West podcast. Listen at www.westerndailypress.co.uk/mysteriouswest and on Glastonbury Radio (www.glastonburyradio.net).











4 Comments
by Dorothee, West Sussex
Friday, August 29 2008, 11:34PM
“And another point:
I was speaking to a tourist from New Zealand, where the heads of Maori burials were taken away by english people and had to be returned 150 years later.
Does this have to happen again? That there has to be a fight to get the remains returned to their rightful place?
I sincerely hope not, this could look very bad - again - for archaeology.
Remains belong in their FINAL resting place.”
by Dorothee, West Sussex
Friday, August 29 2008, 7:55PM
“Oh and another point: If these remains were to be reinterred in a 'licensed premises' that would most likely mean a churchyard somewhere.
That would not only be sacrilege but blasphemy as our own churches have never been recognised.
Do we feel strongly?
I guess we do.”
by Dorothee, west sussex
Friday, August 29 2008, 7:49PM
“Not only were the remains placed there for a reason but here's another point:
If we were to disinter and then not return the remains of any current church leader of any denomination - as a former Lutheran Protestant - Martin Luther King comes to mind or any of the former popes or Mahatma Ghandi - we would be vilified and shot down (verbally at least).
Well, these remains are from our ancestors and leaders so i think we/they should be shown the same respect???
Or am i missing something - like Discrimination for instance?
Like Emma said, it would be so easy to say: we will do our research (to which we are not opposed) and then we will return the remains so they can be reinterred with proper solemn ceremony as is befitting.
So, why don't the responsible people step up to the mark and do the right (and decent) thing and return that which to us is sacred.
Because our human rights are trespassed on - big time.”
by Emma, Wiltshire
Friday, August 29 2008, 11:58AM
“The testing on the bones is not a problem. The removal of the bones is not a huge issue, though with the portable testing equipment theres not really much reason to do so. Its the non return of those bones and remains that has caused so much upset. Julian, why should you not be ashamed? "But what's likely is that the remains will be reburied, although this hasn't been decided yet." is politician speak, for we will take the remains, do what we need to do, then faff around until Joe Public forgets about them. Well sorry but this is one member of the public who will not forget. This could all be so easily solved, with a simple yet binding promise to return the remains, preferably within a set time limit. Why oh why would you not want to do that? What earthly good will they do locked away in a museum drawer somehwere?
Let us not forget the case of the 13 yr old girls remains, found at The Sanctuary, nr Avebury, which were removed in the 1930's with the same aim of 'testing', then lost , the found again, and still to this day she is locked in a drawer, logged by a number, away from the public view, and more importantly away from the place of her burial. How can that be called respectful? If we, the public, regardless of religous leanings, do not stand up and be counted, whats next? What are the archeologists going to be allowed to desecreate next? Is your place of worship next in line?
The people who were buried at Stonehenge, were placed there for a reason, just as we today bury our loved ones in places of significance. Let them rest in peace. Please.”