Woman who stole £43,000 leaves court smiling
A TREASURER who stole £43,000 from a charity community association has escaped a jail sentence even though her actions left her colleagues devastated.
Gillian Whitehead was in a trusted post at Whitchurch Village Community Association when she wrote 67 cheques to herself over the space of three years.
-

Gillian Whitehead
And according to former colleagues her dishonesty has had a devastating effect on the charity which has been forced to push up its prices in a bid to try and recoup some of its losses.
Senior members of the charity have also criticised the fact Whitehead escaped a jail sentence.
Bridal hand tied bouquet (Roses)
2 Bridesmaids (Roses)
Groom & Best Man button holes (Roses)
Terms:
Discounted rates apply to larger Bridal party requests.
Not to be used with any other offer.
Contact: 0117 2448228
Valid until: Tuesday, December 31 2013
Bristol Crown Court heard the 49-year-old admitted the theft as long ago as June 2010 but the case was repeatedly delayed due to problems she had getting legal aid, as well as her ill health, the court was told.
Whitehead pleaded guilty to theft of £43,189.54 over a three-year period between April 2006 and July 2009.
The Recorder of Bristol Judge Neil Ford QC gave her a one-year prison sentence, suspended for two years. Whitehead escaped a spell behind bars as a result of her poor health.
Judge Ford told her: "This was a persistent and gross breach of trust. It has had consequences beyond simply financial loss."
The judge said factors including Whitehead's medical difficulties meant the case took an "inordinate time" to come to court, but she had paid back £11,000 and it was highly likely the group would recover the funds that were stolen.
He said: "That will cause great personal loss to you, your husband and your family but you are the author of your own misfortune."
Whitehead, who came to court in a wheelchair pushed by her husband, was ordered to be supervised for a year and undertake a specified activity requirement for up to ten days.
She refused to comment on the case as she left court.
Tim Thorne junior, who took over as association chairman after his father passed away, said the association had to charge people more to use its hall as a result of Whitehead's activities.
He added: "It is too lenient a sentence, to be fair. It has had a devastating effect and we are going to bear the brunt of it.
"It is not just the money she took, it is the interest too. We are a charity and that money could have been spent on improvements."
Lucille Ademante, association vice chairman, was also upset by the leniency of the sentence.
She said: "She was called to court a number of times and she never turned up. The delay was her fault. It was only by luck and a bit of stealth we found out. We had no paper trail. We are not sure if £43,000 is the total amount."
Richard Posner, prosecuting, said discrepancies were only found after the association realised accounts showed suspiciously high utility bills and suspiciously low income from hiring out the hall.
Whitehead became ill and new treasurer Pat Dunsford uncovered the discrepancies when the association tried to get to grips with the association's finances.
Mr Posner said an investigation, which included the help of a bank, uncovered a history of Whitehead's criminal behaviour over three years.
He said she had used her ill-gotten gains to support her lifestyle, but had paid back £11,170.16 of what she stole.
A hearing in September will determine proceeds of crime and seek a confiscation of funds from her.
Giles Nelson, defending, said his client had suffered an accident at work and medical problems which impaired her physically and mentally.
He said his client offered little in the way of a full explanation for what she did, but it may have been linked to a breakdown in the wake of the death of her father as well as financial pressures on her from her son from a previous relationship.
The association hires out the community association hall to children's playgroups, dance groups and the local bowls club.




Comments
by Dougalbear12
Tuesday, July 10 2012, 11:43PM
“The judge had no right basically letting this woman off, £43,000 is a tremendous amount of money for a charity to absorb, her health should not have been a factor is this, and I personally do not believe she should have the right to claim legal aid to defend herself, she was a greedy dishonest individual who stole money and abused her position of trust, alot of people have financial difficulities in the current economic climate, they dont steal from those who need help more though, I agree shes smiling like the cat that got the cream!!! wheelchair was a good touch though, no doubt shes claiming dissability benefits now aswell, add up the money she stole, her benefits and the cost of the legal aid and shes done really well!!.
Lets hope Karma now has its part to play!!”
by CityClarky
Tuesday, July 10 2012, 8:25PM
“Crime pays. You need to earn about 75k to get 43k (plus) in cash.”
by allananlyn
Monday, July 09 2012, 7:02PM
“shes smiling like a chesire cat,,,,not surprised,,,,living it up for god knows how long,,,,,,a truly remorseful person would not be smiling outside court,,,,,it just goes to show, she would still b doing it if she had not been caught, hope she gets run over a bus,,,,”
by jceegas
Monday, July 09 2012, 6:33PM
“good job she never had a wee on war memorial ha ha ha”
by wildberry2010
Monday, July 09 2012, 6:20PM
“Scandalous! Bet she'll be up and about (wheel chair abandoned) this time next week, talkabout two fingers up at the legal system! JAIL and no less, like someone else said, peeing on a war memorial = jail, screwing dozens of needy trusting people over THREE YEARS (67 sepa rate cheques = 67 separate cases of theft)- deliberate, malicious, pre meditated, greedy THEFT and she comes out laughing! Had she not been middle class, white, and allegedly 'poorly' with her nerves - then bet the outcome would have been somewhat different! Gives 'carte blanche to all treasurers to 'help themselves'!”
by blowtorch
Monday, July 09 2012, 2:39PM
“The sentence was far to lenient but she has a criminal record and will have to live the rest of her life with the stigma of what she has done.”
by Lone_Ranger
Monday, July 09 2012, 2:21PM
“a) No, I'm not a relative of nor do I know this criminal
b) Piledriver - you prove my point that she did not "get away scott-free".
Whether the sentance befits the crime is another matter altogether.”
by piledriver
Monday, July 09 2012, 1:52PM
“:Lone_Ranger
OK, let's examine the punishment.
£43k minimum stolen and about £11k paid back so she's £32k (Net) better off than she was three years ago.
I hope she hasn't spent it all but I'll bet they'll find she doesn't have any assets and she'll finish up paying back £20pcm.
The punishment DOESN'T fit the crime and let's not forget ALL of the people that'll suffer loss as a result of the fact that the charity can't provide.
Instead of the sentence passed she should have got at least three years (First offence she'll do half).Anyone thnking of doing the same.........probably will!
@ pollyxxx:
It depends on how your banking arrangements are set up and she could always have forged another sgnature or paid electronically.”
by MPundit
Monday, July 09 2012, 1:39PM
“Lone Ranger - Looks like you are in the minority - guess that's why you are called the Lone Ranger - could you be a relative??????????”
by Bristol135
Monday, July 09 2012, 1:33PM
“Lou and Andy”