VIEW PROPOSALS: Clean energy hope from wave power in Severn

Trusted article source icon
Friday, July 25, 2008
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Tidal lagoons and a wave farm are possibilities in a list of

10 proposals to generate power from the Severn Estuary.

Forming part of the Government's tidal energy feasibility

study, the proposals were met with enthusiasm by opponents of

the Severn barrage scheme.

"http://i.thisis.co.uk/274156/binaries/SevernBarrageGraphic_250708.pdf">

"http://i.thisis.co.uk/274156/binaries/BarrageProposalsBox_pdf.jpg"

width="200" border="0">

"http://i.thisis.co.uk/274156/binaries/spacer.gif" width=

"20">

"http://i.thisis.co.uk/274156/binaries/SevernBarrageGraphic_250708.jpg">

"http://i.thisis.co.uk/274156/binaries/wdpBarrageProposalsBox_jpg.jpg"

width="200" border="0">

Environmentalists also welcomed the alternatives but

stressed the need for comprehensive environmental assessment of

each proposal.

The plans which will be given further consideration were

unveiled at an event in Cardiff yesterday.

A shortlist will be published later in the year for which

schemes will be taken forward for more extensive research.

The schemes announced include the well-studied 10 mile

Cardiff-Weston barrage plan, which could generate up to 5 per

cent of the UK's electricity, and the shorter Shoots barrage

further up the estuary.

The list also includes an even larger 'Outer Barrage' from

Minehead in Somerset to Aberthaw and the Beachley barrage which

would be further upstream and have a smaller operating capacity

than the Shoots barrage. Other proposals being considered

include a tidal fence scheme which would have a barrier with

open sections and involve tidal stream turbines to capture

energy as tide ebbs and flows.

A reef proposal which would include floating turbines to

harness energy is also on the list.

Energy Secretary John Hutton, who commissioned the

feasibility study, said: “Harnessing the power of the Severn

estuary could be an engineering project of breathtaking scale

and we will look at the full range of technologies and

locations.

“Such a project could play an important role in our ambition

to dramatically increase the amount of energy from renewable

sources. The tidal range on the Severn is the second largest in

the world and has the potential to provide around 5 per cent of

the UK's current electricity demand.”

Jane Davidson, Minister for Environment, Sustainability and

Housing for the Welsh Assembly, said: “It is important to

stress that while there is much talk of a 'barrage', this

feasibility study is looking at a range of other options.

“The potential here is great and the Severn Estuary is a

resource that could help us make a significant contribution to

the proposed UK renewables target of 15 per cent by 2020.”

The two-year multi-million-pound feasibility study aims to

assess the costs, benefits and impact of such a tidal scheme in

the Severn and identify a single preferred project from the

options that have been proposed.

Proposals for a barrage across the estuary have attracted

controversy, with wildlife groups concerned about the impact it

could have on the rich ecosystems in the area, which is home to

thousands of over-wintering birds.

The Government's sustainability watchdog the Sustainable

Development Commission (SDC) last year said a tidal barrage

blocking the tide's flow through the estuary could be built if

it complied with environmental laws.

But green groups such as Friends of the Earth have called

for less environmentally damaging schemes such as tidal

lagoons, which would harness the tide's power as it ebbed and

flowed.

The RSPB also expressed concerns at some of the proposals

and said others, such as tidal reefs, would cause much less

harm.

Friends of the Earth energy campaigner and member of the

Severn Tidal Strategic Environmental Assessment steering group

Neil Crumpton said he was delighted the Government was looking

at a range of options for the Severn.

“There are some exciting tidal projects on the table which

could produce as much as 10 per cent of the UK's renewable

energy 2020 target in a more cost effective way than the Severn

Barrage – and without damaging the environment or threatening

access to the port at Bristol.

But a spokesman for the Department for Business said: “We

are fully committed to meeting our fair share of the EU target.

This has been demonstrated by the renewables strategy

consultation which we published last month and which will see a

tenfold increase in renewable energy generation by 2020.”

Martin Harper, chief executive of the Wildfowl &

Wetlands Trust (WWT) and head of sustainable development at the

RSPB, said: “We absolutely support the use of sustainable,

renewable sources of energy so it is interesting to see which

schemes are being considered.

“WWT has submitted information to the Government as part of

the strategic environmental assessment and continues to offer

our unique expertise on wetlands and their wildlife. We

strongly urge the greatest care to be taken to properly assess

the environmental impact of each of these proposed schemes.

“It is right that all options for clean energy generation be

considered but the feasibility study should rule out projects

where the damage and costs outweigh the benefits.

“Projects like a large barrage or tidal lagoons would

fundamentally change the nature of the Severn Estuary which is

heavily protected by law.”

Concerns were also raised over the impact the schemes would

have on Weston-super-Mare. Mike Bell, Liberal Democrat

parliamentary candidate, said: “The publication of this long

list of possible schemes is welcome, as it further advances the

debate on energy generation from the Severn Estuary.

“However, it is another wake up call for Weston-super-Mare

since half the schemes, if built, would have no direct economic

or leisure benefits for Weston.

“There are very important environmental challenges – both in

terms of sustainable power generation and impact on the Estuary

environment – to be overcome.

“But Weston is also in a tight fight to secure jobs and

regeneration dividends.

“Bridgwater, Burnham-on-Sea, Cardiff, Clevedon and other

towns further up the estuary stand to benefit if the right

scheme is chosen.”

3
Tweet this article
Report

3 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by G R, north somerset

    Tuesday, August 26 2008, 11:33AM

    “Any option which allows some type of wire mesh to stop fish and dolphins going through the turbines would be good. Also if there were breaks in the barrage so that fish and other creatures could pass through with safety as option 8 would be great too. I suggest those who do not want this type of electric generation - would they prefer a windmill, a coal fired, nuclear or recycling type of generator close to their house instead? Also unfortunately although this may have an impact on some wildlife - any generation of electricity will have some negative impact on wildlife - so unless we go back to using candles and pushbikes then a balance has to be found and the lesser of the evils chosen.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Peter Gaze, Bath

    Wednesday, July 30 2008, 11:33PM

    “Could there be some mechanically supported "mud flats" which go up and down to mimic the tidal behavior of the Severn? Birds could then roost on them and feed off worms, as they do now. But the real tides will have been tamed by one or other of the barrages. Just a thought. It's the effect on birds which seems the major gripe against our getting 5% of our energy which isn't dependent on the Russians or the Iranians.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by chris noble, Yeovil

    Friday, July 25 2008, 11:56AM

    “This is encouraging as the barrage scheme was not popular, BUT will anything actually come to fruition. It is no good simply talking about these schemes; action is what is needed and action NOW. At least the nimbys should be satisfied as there will not be very much to see. Still it will be interesting to see the reactions of the public.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters