Squatters 'delay' Bristol affordable housing
A housing association says squatters are holding up its plans to renovate a building in St Paul's to create affordable homes.
Places for People says it wants to help first-time buyers and families urgently in need of housing by refurbishing 87 Ashley Road, a four-storey Georgian townhouse that it owns.
But the building has been illegally occupied since April and is now home to a group of 20 squatters.
The squatters, a group of men and women who say they are taking good care of the building, are refusing to move, claiming Places for People has not made its intentions for the house clear.
One of the squatters, known only as Bart, said he would be willing to move out if he was sure Places for People was creating social housing and not private homes for the open market.
An eviction notice was served after Places for People won a county court battle over the squatters.
But when bailiffs called at the property to evict the occupiers, it emerged that they had not received seven days' notice of the eviction date and were legally entitled to stay temporarily.
Bart said the squatters could still be evicted from the house, formerly owned by Bristol Churches housing association, and they were trying to reach a settlement with Places for People.
Beth Hearn, spokeswoman for Places for People, said further legal action was being pursued. She said: "The house has been illegally occupied by squatters for the past two months – causing a delay in helping local people access affordable housing, and causing significant maintenance issues at an added cost to ourselves. The properties will provide affordable homes for a number of local people."
She continued: "At Places for People, we are committed to creating sustainable communities. We offer a complete range of housing tenures, as well as local facilities such as schools, nurseries, employment and transport links - all of the things that contribute to making communities prosperous, vibrant, popular and therefore sustainable in the future.
"Unfortunately, this situation is significantly delaying our attempts to provide affordable housing to St Paul's. We want to completely refurbish the property and rent out to young people at affordable rates.
She added: "The people squatting in the house wrongly think we want to develop the building and sell flats for high prices."
Bart, who has been squatting for several years, says the building, called Unity House, has been empty for three years.
He said: "We've not been told what Places for People are planning to do with the building.
"Nothing's been lodged with the council and some of their plans have been opposed by St Paul's Unlimited. They say they want to help first-time buyers but they're not going to be helping people on the homeless register. It would be different if the company were putting the building to good use."
Squatting itself is not a criminal offence. However, it is illegal to get into a property by breaking in or damaging windows and doors. In some cases, squatters can also be prosecuted for other offences. There is a risk this could happen to squatters if they do not leave when the landlord gets a court order, or if a person who normally lives in the property, or has a right to move in (such as a new tenant), asks them to leave.







35 Comments
View all
by GingerRog, Bristol
Tuesday, November 04 2008, 6:41PM
“Steve ~ that would be gRATifying!”
by Steve, Isle of Bikes
Monday, November 03 2008, 11:40PM
“~~~GR~~~
I think Gerry means "his (Alex) bike has a puncture".
Should old tandems be re-cycled?”
by gerry, bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 10:00PM
“GingerRog, I think hes got a puncture.”
by GingerRog, Bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 8:34PM
“Gerry, Alex is posting on the bouncer story ~ and still going strong after a week!!”
by GingerRog, Bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 7:55PM
“No Gerry ~ he has gone AWOL.”
by Bob, Bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 7:37PM
“No-none yet seems to have noted that these squatters probably aren't decent car owning citizens.
I bet they're of the cycling fraternity instead.
As a society, I don't know why we tolerate it. When they start paying road tax like me, and stop mowing down pedestrians, then we'll talk, until then, throw away the key.”
by gerry, bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 7:36PM
“Anyone seen Alex ??”
by GingerRog, Bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 7:06PM
“This house must be quite famous by now :-)
Can't wait for the film crews to arrive!!”
by cubist, Bristol
Monday, November 03 2008, 6:14PM
“Well said Harry.
I think we can all complain about squatters, but surely it is immoral to leave inner city buildings empty and unused in areas where there is real need for housing. I believe there is a law in Amsterdam (if not the whole of the Netherlands - but may be wrong) which does not allow buildings to be empty for more than six months.
Wouldn't Stokes Croft change if we adopted the same idea?
Generally the squats I've seen, both here and abroad, have been coherent and positive contributions to their local societies - yes there can be problems, but people squat for a variety of reasons.
I was in one only the other week, and I had a great evening whilst the residents raised money for a deserving cause. A case of people who care about more than which town gets to film 'Casualty' actually doing something for the wider society, rather than just moaning. Nice people.”
by Harry, easton
Monday, November 03 2008, 5:24PM
“I have been looking at some of the comments on here and over on that Indymedia site, where the squatters seem to be publishing, and I think a few folk need to get their priorities straight.
I noticed that the squatters point out that the boss of Places for People earns a 6 figure sum and thought that's not too charitable that's MY money he's dining out on for doing what exactly,
Then I looked at this shared ownership thing, which it seems the landlords want do with this building. This shared thing seems to work out that youngsters with a bit of money get a mortgage for half a flat and then rent the other half from a housing group who get money from central government to do it up. And then some sort of buy back option at the end
I then thought hang on this racket (Places for People) get money from the government,I.E MINE, to sell over a long period of time houses to those who cant afford it who are forced into mortgages from banks such as B+B and Northern Rock whose managers get bailed out with money I.E MINE so that some bloke from Places for People can get make even more money out of ME. I remember when social housing meant social housing.
I think people have got a lot more to worry about than a bunch of hippies putting a roof over their heads in winter. The real crooks are laughing at us.”