Snarl-up proves need for new railway links

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

The stunning level of congestion at Cribbs Causeway on Monday, December 22, illustrates how poorly served we are in Greater Bristol by public transport.

Look at a map and see just how close the freight railway through Filton and Henbury to Avonmouth passes the Cribbs Causeway development.

We are where we are, of course, but there is ample precedent for commercial developers to pay for local rail enhancements from the enormous increase in their land values.

The north Bristol freight line crosses under the A38 a short walk away from Filton College, where there would be significant custom for a regular train service.

The line skirts Filton airfield and should be diverted for a passenger service underground, below the runways, to the shopping centre. It also crosses the A4018 at Henbury where there would be scope for a park-and-ride.

At Avonmouth, the line joins the Severn Beach line, where it could combine to create a northern loop service: Temple Meads – Filton Abbey Wood – Filton College and Airport – Cribbs Causeway – Henbury Parkway – Avonmouth – Clifton – Montpelier – Lawrence Hill and on to Temple Meads.

Trains should continue through Temple Meads to Bedminster and up to Portishead, with a new station at Ashton Gate for the re-sited football stadium.

There is easily enough custom for this to make sense and take commuters' and shoppers' cars off the road. Combining this with the Portishead re-opening improves the financial case for each half of the service.

It's the people who work at Cribbs I feel sorry for whenever there are sales. Shoppers go there of their own accord, the workers have no choice.

Fancy having three hours added to your journey home time – it's completely uncivilised when the solution has been there for the asking.

Robert Harris Dursley

3
Tweet this article
Report

3 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Greg Heathcliffe, Swindon

    Saturday, January 03 2009, 6:53AM

    “Sorry Charles, but this time I can't agree, unless the "obsolete" transport to which you refer is the private car.
    Dangerous, expensive, environmentally damaging, polluting, requiring ever more of our fast disappearing land for roads, congestion causing, using up now scarce resources for fuel - the car has had its day.
    By contrast the train is safe, (more deaths on our roads in 2006 than in the whole 200 year history of rail travel in Britain), reliable, efficient and a single track railway need be no wider (land usage again) than a single track road.
    The train is the future of land transport as they know in France, Germany, Japan, even the USA are rediscovering that fact.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Charles Henry, Somerset

    Friday, January 02 2009, 9:10AM

    “Boosting 'obsolete' public transport when we will all clearly need to own and drive cars for the foreseeable future, is as foolhardy as instructing Supermarkets to abandon their 'self-service' and return to having assistants behind every counter to reduce the queues there, would be.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Greg Heathcliffe, Swindon

    Thursday, January 01 2009, 8:37AM

    “All very true, but as a letter of mine mentioned a few days ago, only the UKIP have both solution and finance in place to carry out our plans. The others can only say what they'd like to do, but have no hope of actually going ahead as they haven't got the money.
    Greg Heathcliffe, UKIP Swindon Branch.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article