Save green belt demand Bristol protesters

Trusted article source icon
Monday, March 09, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

More than 100 protesters held a demonstration in the centre of Bristol to fight plans to build thousands of new homes on the green belt surrounding the city.

Members of a number of groups set up by residents in areas threatened with the loss of protected land gathered on Harbourside to voice their protests.

From Dundry, Whitchurch and Long Ashton to Shortwood, Siston and Warmley, they travelled to the Architecture Centre, where recently unveiled plans for a new town of 10,000 homes south of Long Ashton have gone on display.

Developers of the £2.5-billion Ashton Park project said the town would accommodate 25,000 residents and boast six schools, two "district centres", shops, community centre and a business park.

But the growing number of people fighting to save the green belt said if allowed, it would be just a taste of things to come for other areas.

Under proposals contained in the controversial South West Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS), more than 117,000 new homes will be built in the former Avon area by 2026 if given approval.

They include 38,500 for Bristol, 32,800 for South Gloucestershire, 26,750 for North Somerset and 19,300 for Bath and North East Somerset.

The document has put huge areas of countryside under threat and the reaction from the public has been so great – some 35,000 people from the region took part in the consultation – that the Government's response is not expected until later this year.

Land designated as green belt is usually found around towns and cities such as Bristol, forming an area where development is not normally allowed in order to prevent urban sprawl.

Campaigners are determined to protect it and want a re-think on moves to concrete over the green space.

Pip Sheard, of Bristol Friends of the Earth and Transport for Greater Bristol Alliance, said protest groups had formed to highlight the sheer scale of the development that threatened the countryside.

She said people at the demonstration lived in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire and were joined by others from Bath and Cheltenham.

She said: "We have people working together from all over the West of England opposing the Government's high growth in housing targets."

She said the RSS was "loathed" but the development juggernaut was already on the road and it was vital for people to work together to stop it.

Jacquie Stephens, of the Save Warmley and Siston Green Spaces group, addressed the crowd and said it was "fantastic" that they had answered the rallying call to protest.

She said: "It shows that people power is important. We don't think there was a proper consultation on the RSS and we are trying to get a judicial review."

Chris Pope, of Dundry Residents' Action Group (DRAG), told the campaigners: "The exhibition that is on here today represents the first phase of the RSS and its intention to rob Bristol of the green belt.

"This development will set a precedent, If it succeeds, then others will also succeed. What happens with this one will affect you all."

Mary Walsh, of the Protect Whitchurch Green Belt Alliance, said: "We are just a small village but in the 60s, Bristol built thousands of houses around us. Now we have just one fillet of green left and we want to save it."

The demonstrators also heard from Ron Morton, of the Shortwood Green Belt Campaign, who said the protest was necessary because no-one in Government was listening to local people.

He said: "I want an opportunity to talk to the ministers behind these plans to tell them what's wrong with them."

DRAG spokeswoman Debbie Nicholls said she was pleased with the number of people who turned up for the event.

She said: "People have come a long way to give us their support. All the action groups are bonding together to support everyone – it's the only way forward.

"If we can show strength of numbers, hopefully the Government will start to take notice."

The Ashton Park scheme has been unveiled by developer Land Trust for a site between the A38 at Dundry, near the Barrow Tanks, right down to the A370 Long Ashton bypass and would provide nearly all the new housing proposed in the RSS for the south-western edge of Bristol up to 2026.

But campaigners are angry it was put forward before a decision on the RSS was made.

15
Tweet this article
Report

15 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by david hixon, Keresley, Coventry

    Sunday, August 02 2009, 7:51AM

    “They are planning to build 35,000 house in Coventry on Greenbelt areas, all the country needs to join togethr to protest”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by bighandsmcgree, south bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 10:10PM

    “Let me give you a real world fact - you say the area needs jobs, wealth etc, lower population means more wealth per person and fewer people to find jobs for, along with lower environmental impacts

    not disagreeing with that glenn it's just that this is not what is happening”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Glenn Vowles, vowlesthegreen.blogspot.com

    Monday, March 09 2009, 7:35PM

    “Not much genuine argument here bighandsmcgree! Mostly assertion unsupported by evidence.

    Let me give you a real world fact - you say the area needs jobs, wealth etc, lower population means more wealth per person and fewer people to find jobs for, along with lower environmental impacts.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by bighandsmcgree, south bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 7:22PM

    “If you look at the undeniable arithmetic his view makes good sense.


    sense it may be bogspot however like most green policies it isnt reality is it? 61 million and going up at the last count.

    sorry just over 100 people protest not exactly a huge number is it? South bristol neads houses roads jobs and wealth, there is plenty of green belt as this will surely go ahead as we live in the real world.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by brisfan, Bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 6:20PM

    “Unfortunately those of us who have read the revised proposals for the RSS know only too well that the extensions that are planned are not well thought out and significantly exceed the projected estimates supplied by local authorities for the numbers of new houses required. Bunging 8000 houses in one area as they are proposing to do in and around Warmley/Siston without reference to appropriate infrastructure, public transport, employment prospects etc, is not the solution - it merely creates more problems. The Green Belt exists for the benefit of everyone not just those who live in/near to it and once it's gone it's gone!!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Glenn Vowles, vowlesthegreen.blogspot.com

    Monday, March 09 2009, 5:31PM

    “I agree very strongly with Sarah about proposing to build more houses on proteced green spaces when there are significant numbers of empty houses - I believe there are 7000 in Bristol alone!

    We are also a very long way from exhausting the brown field sites within cities. Classifying land as green belt is meaningless if we are just going to build over it as planned...

    I do appreciate the contribution of Peter from Kingsdown however, as it raises a key issue - that of population growth. We would have the pressure for house building eased considerably and would find many social and environmental targets easier to meet if we could prevent large population growth and preferably reduce it a little from where we are today. Sustainable Development Commission Chairman Jonathon Porritt has recently called for people to voluntarily have a maximum of two children (and in his latest blog post favours a policy of immigration numbers that equal emigration numbers ie no net increase). If you look at the undeniable arithmetic his view makes good sense.

    (Apologies to David for implying that he name called due to bracketting him with Anon, who certainly did).”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Paul Mizen, Bemmy Down

    Monday, March 09 2009, 5:19PM

    “I presume Peter, David, and Anon were part of the 35,000 who responded to the consultation?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Sarah, Bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 4:34PM

    “David, would it not make sense to use the 1 million empty properties in the UK first, as well as the many brown field sites, before building on green belt land?

    Re accusation of 'NIMBYS', is it not fair to say that we all have the right to protest when the quality of our life is to be made worse, whatever the reason? I don't live in the country, but I enjoy going there, so I don't feel I can be accused of 'Nimbyism', which as Glenn has pointed out, is often used as a cheap jibe.

    Just how many homeless people do we see living rough? Enough to warrant the building of tens of thousands of houses on green belt land around Bristol?

    Do our open spaces mean so little to people?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by david, bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 3:55PM

    “Oh and by the way Glenn Vowles not once have i named called anyone thank you”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by david, bristol

    Monday, March 09 2009, 3:52PM

    “Yes sarah im mean here we go again because these plans will be held up when we so badly need more houses built”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters