Residents fight Bristol green belt development

Trusted article source icon
Monday, July 20, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Controversial plans to build hundreds of new homes on green belt land in Failand have been put forward by developers.

Cheshire-based developers FLP have revealed proposals to build up to 500 homes on 55 acres of green belt land on fields at the top of Belmont Hill on the eastern side of the village.

The development would also include a new school, village green, care home, shop and surgery and business units.

There are also plans to build a new community hall, children’s play area, some affordable homes and install a new gas supply to the village.

The developers say they hope to introduce a new bus service as part of the development, improve opportunities for broadband connection and carry out highways improvements.

Leaflets detailing the proposals have been delivered to hundreds of homes in Failand and the surrounding villages of Flax Bourton and Wraxall.

FLP chiefs plan to hold two consultation sessions for local residents to find out more about the proposals.

In a statement from FLP it said: “Failand shares a close geographic relationship with Bristol and this site will enable a sustainable development to support the growth of Bristol and the wider region.

“At the heart of this proposal is a design philosophy which seeks to provide Failand with the essential facilities and amenities, enhancing the quality of life for the whole community.

“The physical and visual containment of the site will enable new development to maintain the key attributes of the green belt.”

Local residents are furious at the proposals and have vowed to fight the plan tooth and nail.

A working group has been set up by villagers and is gearing up to launch a campaign to stop the proposals in their tracks.

Working group member John Chapman, who has lived in the village for 13 years, said: “We have set up the group to fight off this outrageous proposal.

“The green belt is for everyone’s benefit and we see ourselves as the guardians of the green belt for our future generations.

“These developers are just opportunistic speculators.

“If this is allowed to go ahead it would mean Failand, which currently has around 300 homes, would more than double in size.

“We are strongly opposed to these plans and are going to fight them and win.”

Leaflets have already been distributed around the village by the working group asking for people’s support to fight the proposal.

Already residents have already submitted 150 letters against the scheme to FLP headquarters.

Mr Chapman, 50, said: “We will be putting all our efforts into fighting this on planning grounds.

“It has been encouraging to see the strength of feeling against these plans and these proposals have stirred up a lot of strong emotions in the village.

“There is no doubt that if building is allowed in this part of the green belt, developers will soon be picking off other areas of protected land.

“They need to go away and develop elsewhere on brownfield sites and leave our green belt alone.”

This is not the first time villagers have fought off proposals for large developments in the village.

In 2003 residents joined forces to campaign against plans to install a waste transfer station on land just at the rear of the Failand Inn pub.

Wraxall and Failand Parish Council chairman councillor Chris Ambrose said he had received a number of calls from concerned residents about the scheme.

Mr Ambrose said: “Residents have serious concerns about any potential development of this site.

“They want to see the green belt protected and are also worried that there is not the infrastructure in place to support such a development.”

No formal planning application has yet been submitted to North Somerset Council.

Consultation sessions are being held at the Avon Room, Redwood Hotel and Country Club on July 30 from 2-8pm and at Long Ashton Village Hall, Keedwell Hill, Long Ashton on July 31 from 2-8pm.

People wanting to comment should write to FLP, Gladman House, Alexandria Way, Congleon, Cheshire, CW12 1LB.

FLP, which is part of the Gladman Group, said all views will be taken into consideration as it develops the master plan for the site.

Anyone wanting to join the residents’ working group can contact Mr Chapman on 07980 549258.

25
Tweet this article
Report

25 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Richard Lane, Knowle

    Tuesday, July 21 2009, 10:05PM

    “Snowy.
    You are quite correct about certain natives but they are the minority. what I refer to is the norm amongst the recent immigrants. The british native birthrate is minimal in comparrison and that is where I was saying the increase in population will come from.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Jacqueline, bridgeyate, bristol

    Tuesday, July 21 2009, 9:10AM

    “Green belt is important for food production, recreation and wildlife and needs to be readily accessible for those who live in large conurbation.It is important to keep it intact for everyones benefit, not only those who live within its boundaries. Too many people are disconnected from the land and wildlife and ever expanding cities will not help us connect. The world's population is growing alarmingly let alone ours. Inorder for the whole planet to be sustainable, distrbution of wealth, education and birth control are essential.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by snowymalone, Briz

    Tuesday, July 21 2009, 6:25AM

    “"We are witnessing the death of the English nation through the effects of mass immigration." The English nation is the absolute result of 2000 years of mass immigration. We're the original mongrol race - as is our language. that's why we have the biggest vocabulary of all, because there are so many different elements to it, and its globalisation is the result of this - no fiddly irregular verbs or inflections.

    As for "Unfortunately our wonderful government have already sown
    the seeds of our population rise by allowing people to engluf our shores that have a much higher birthrate than that of the native Brit...." - try walking round Hartcliffe or Southmead, look at the households with seven or eight children and chain-smoking adults who completely live off the state and tell me what ethnic group they are (hint - they also blame anyone non-white of "stealing their jobs".)

    Britain is a victim of its own past success, as are all former world leading nations. Old Blighty has been gone a long, long time - in some respects sad, yes, but we aren't in 1950 and we don't live in the world of Ealing comedy. Some return of that era's culture of politeness and respect would be nice to see, but neither of those are ethnically dependant.

    Anyway, once again, it's fascinating to see how the actual point of a story gets immediately submerged by agenda-ridden ranting. For what it's worth, I agree they should leave Failand alone and focus on the empty properties that abound in the city itself. Besides, are these developers the same ones that scarcely a year ago were wailing and gnashing their teeth as they had so many properties lying unsold? Greedy opportunists, and local authorities who just roll over at the slightest sniff of money (witness First Bus - for whose benefit is that run?)

    The first comment had it right - this would enhance no-one's quality of life. So for all those that rant and rave about the "English" way of life being eroded, stop looking abroad, and start looking at the company logo on the side of the dumper trucks heading towards a peaceful, pretty, unspoilt village near you. I doubt the chairman of that company is an economic migrant.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Richard Lane, Knowle

    Monday, July 20 2009, 8:15PM

    “Chris.
    Unfortunately our wonderful government have already sown
    the seeds of our population rise by allowing people to engluf our shores that have a much higher birthrate than that of the native Brit.
    More housing will be required for these people and it will be in the cities that they are housed.
    Then new housing will be required for the indiginous population that are fleeing the new ghettos and searching for a return to old Blighty.
    It is written.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Anthony B Liar, Easy Street

    Monday, July 20 2009, 7:48PM

    “Now, come on people. Stop complaining and banish those nasty frowns. My government and I have striven to make England a green and pleasant land and Gordon is carrying on this wonderful job (although he is a bit of a sweaty slob).

    What is wrong with property development? Cherie and I have done really well out of it. So stop complaining and wear a happy face.

    Erm...do I get paid now or later? Make the cheque out to Cherie. She has a wizard accountant who knows all the tax loopholes.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Chris, Bristol

    Monday, July 20 2009, 7:16PM

    “Here we go, the old 'racist' dig again. Sigh, some people are sooooo predictable, it gets tedious.

    Some things need to stay the same; like our need for open space, tranquility, room for wildlife. Sadly, some just appear to see the countryside as the boring bits between one concrete jungle and the next; all ripe for 'development', all potentital sites for another Tesco or McDonalds.

    Despite the shallow accusations of racism from Bob, the fact is that if the population is to be allowed to increase from 61 to 70 million (and beyond - there is to be no cap set on the amount of people allowed here) then they have to live somewhere.

    So, ultimately the choice may be between the 'joys' of multiculturalism, or our ancient and much valued countryside.

    Without the extra 10 million plus, there is no argument for extra housing on this scale, it's as simple as that.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Homeless Hooray Harry of Knightsbridge, Knightsbridge with no windmills

    Monday, July 20 2009, 7:09PM

    “Build the houses quickly and then add a couple of hundred windwills in the back gardens of those who already live there.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by derek, Nuremburg (ex Bristol)

    Monday, July 20 2009, 7:02PM

    “Typical so called "upper class snobbery.Brings me to mind of the old Navy saying,Pull up tne ladder Jack,I´m alright,I`m back onboard.None of you own the village,only the land your house is on,(If it`s paid for that is!)”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Sebastian, Portishead

    Monday, July 20 2009, 6:13PM

    “Forget the homeless,we do not want them living near us.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Greg, Bristol

    Monday, July 20 2009, 5:59PM

    “Mark G - "people who because they have to live in highrise city dwellings wish to infect the smaller villages with their idea of 'living'."

    That comes down to the root of the matter, so you don't have to live next to these "people" eh? Just pure snobbery. As long as the value of your property is protected everyone else can go to hell?

    A lovely attitude towards the rest of humankind.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters