Parents' anger over school places row

Trusted article source icon
Monday, June 08, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Parents are lobbying for a change in admission rules in South Gloucestershire schools to prevent brothers and sisters being split up.

At one school, families whose older children are pupils have been told their younger siblings will have to go elsewhere because there isn't enough room.

They have been caught by the rule that says only families living within two miles of a school get extra priority for having children already there.

In Acton Turville, near Badminton, that means some parents who do not even live in South Gloucestershire are allowed a place because their home is closer.

The village is not far from the county border so families in Burton and Nettleton – both in Wiltshire – have been granted places for their children at Trinity, while parents in South Gloucestershire areas that are slightly further away cannot get their children accepted.

Now those families affected by the rule have launched a petition for a change in what they claim is an unfair system.

They said it will leave them with major difficulties getting their children to lessons in the morning and collecting them in the afternoon from schools that are often miles apart.

The mums and dads have also enlisted the support of Northavon MP Steve Webb, who is backing their efforts, and said: "Under the present rule, only families living within two miles of a school get extra priority for having children already there.

"There are some families who have no children at the school at the moment but because they live slightly nearer, have been awarded places, including parents who do not live in South Gloucestershire."

The families want the council to change its admission rules so that having siblings at Trinity carries increased weight, no matter where they live.

Sharon Taylor, 38, of West Littleton, has 10-year-old Jake and six-year-old Libby at Trinity but when four-year-old Isabella starts school in September, she will have to go to Marshfield Primary.

Sharon said: "The distance we will have to cover is a problem if we are to get the children to two different schools at the same time."

She also wants Isabella at the same school so she will be with her siblings.

Belinda Delargy, of Hinton, has one son, Charles, at Trinity but his brother, Harry, will have to go to Wick Primary when he starts school in the autumn.

She said: "The schools are in opposite directions and about nine miles apart.

"To drop both children at 8.45am at two different schools and collecting them both at 3.20pm will be impossible."

South Gloucestershire Council spokesman Ryan Skeets said 90 per cent of those applying for a school place for this year got their first preference, with 96 per cent allocated one at one of their preferred schools.

He said: "Siblings are given a high priority when allocating places if a family lives within a certain distance of the school or where the family live in an Area of Prime Responsibility for a particular school or schools.

"The council also has to take into account a legal ruling which would make it unlawful for an authority to treat applicants living outside the local authority area less favourably than those living within it.

"The council reviews and consults on its school admissions policy annually and considers any responses to the consultation before the policy is agreed.

"These issues were not raised during the consultation for September 2009 and September 2010 admissions.

"The views expressed in any petition can be fed into the consultation process for the September 2011 admissions policy."

6
Tweet this article
Report

6 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by AMANDA, BANES

    Thursday, October 08 2009, 9:08AM

    “I am outraged also at this over school places, how do they expect us to get our children to school for 8.50am if we have several drop offs, i have 5 children attending schools and i have 3 drop offs at the moment my sonwas declined a space at his his siblings school because we live just out of the catch ment area, yet the september before my children we allocated a space, ii am looking forward to the ROSE REPORT due to take effect from december, which gives a bit more slack on theese issues.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by easy answer, bristol

    Tuesday, June 09 2009, 9:08AM

    “It should go back to the old ways of going to a school
    you have to go the the nearest school where you live and then all the children in that family can go there in the years to come”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by AngusG, Bristol

    Monday, June 08 2009, 10:27PM

    “The lady from Hinton has a real problem - there simply isn't a school within two miles of Hinton. Is it fair that people like her have to accept the leftovers, or that no-one with children should live in Hinton or similar rural villages?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Simon, bath

    Monday, June 08 2009, 3:48PM

    “I think both of the comments so far fail to understand the difference between schools in built up areas & those in rural locations.

    Unfortunately, we too are in a similar situation & all "local" schools are a significant car journey away, walking to any of them is simply not an option.

    Remember, people do move home for genuine reasons such as a growing family & there are often few housing choices within the 2 mile radius. Inevitably this can cause one to fall foul of this system.

    As I understand it, the selection criteria in South Glos. favours children living within 2 miles before siblings are considered. Therefore genuinely local children are rightly unaffected - not sure if this is the case in Bristol. In rural areas though inevitably many families live outside the 2 mile boundary & this is where I believe the problem lies.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by hannah, bristol

    Monday, June 08 2009, 10:51AM

    “I agree with Ned. We need this rule in Bristol too. We live in Henleaze, where more than half the reception places at Henleaze Infants are taken up by siblings. Many of these siblings live nowhere near the school. The reason for this is because parents from all parts of the city move their older children to the Junior school knowing that they will get their younger children into the Infants. There are also many people who are renting properties to get their eldest child in, before moving away from the area. There are also many people using business addresses etc, which this rule would not address, but it would go some way to helping genuine people get places for their children at their local schools.

    Bristol City Council - are you going to follow suit?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Ned, Bristol

    Monday, June 08 2009, 9:52AM

    “This system seems fair to me. Why dont they move all their children to a school near to home, why drive miles away at all.
    Get out of your cars and use your local schools, let your children and you be a part of your local community and let them make friends locally.

    This rule stuffs parents who live down the road from this school and cannot get in near to home. We nned this rule in Bristol as well, it stops abuse of the sibling rule ie. parents living in the area for a year moving away and getting all their other children in.
    Local schools for local people!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters