Bristol school catchment areas scrapped

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Catchment areas for popular primary schools in north Bristol have been scrapped.

The catchment system, which was only used in Bristol for allocating places to children at seven schools, will be axed from September 2010.

It has been scrapped following a complaint from a parent who was unsuccessful in winning a place for his infant at any of the schools near his home in Henleaze last year.

The change will end anomalies such as a child living very close to a school but failing to get a place.

However, it will not make any difference to the shortage of primary places in areas of high demand.

Catchment areas, or "areas of first responsibility", for Bishop Road, Colston's, Stoke Bishop, Westbury-on-Trym and Westbury Park primaries and Elmlea and Henleaze infants have been dropped, bringing the schools in line with all other community and Church of England primaries in the city.

Children in care and those with special needs have first priority for places, followed by those with brothers or sisters already at the school.

After that, allocation of places is decided on a simple distance measurement where those closest to the school – in a straight line – get in.

This has not been the case up to now, as the schools are not all in the centre of their areas of priority, meaning that someone living within the priority area could be given a place ahead of someone living closer to the school but outside the priority area.

The change is prompted by a ruling last year by the Schools Adjudicator, an independent overseer of school admissions arrangements.

Dan Preddy, one of dozens of parents who were unsuccessful in obtaining a place for their child in any of the schools in the Henleaze area last year, had complained to the adjudicator about the rules.

The adjudicator did not find the Bristol system unfair but commented: "It does... seem anomalous to operate a system relying on priority areas knowing that the schools are unlikely to be able to accommodate a significant number of the children living within those areas.

"This undermines one of the main benefits of priority areas, namely that they assist parents in being able to assess whether they have a real chance of being offered a place at a particular school."

The areas in question, the adjudicator acknowledged, had been in place for many years and demographics in the area and the popularity of schools had changed in the past decade.

Following the adjudication, the council carried out a consultation on dropping the areas and Bristol's admissions forum decided on the change.

More than a dozen schools have made extra classes available this year after unprecedented demand for reception places.

Many parents in the Bishopston area found they had not been successful in gaining a place this September at their first three school choices until schools agreed to expand.

Liz Haydon-Turner's son Sam, four, has now been offered place at Sefton Park School. Mrs Haydon-Turner, 35, a solicitor of Bishopston, is a member of the Bristol Primary Allocation Crisis Group set up by parents earlier this year.

She said the new method of allocating places would still leave parents not knowing if they lived close enough to their preferred school in any given year.

She said: "We are back to square one. In our case my son would have got into Bishop Road School straight away under the new allocation system because we live 300 metres from the school.

"Our son did not get a place at Bishop Road, Sefton Park or Ashley Down initially. It has been incredibly stressful.

"If it comes down to distance it is not going to shift the problem. Ashley Down's catchment area was 770m last year and this year it is 348m.

"It halved because of the increasing population with children of primary school age."

Doug Woods of Woods Estate Agents in Westbury-on-Trym said parents were prepared to pay 10 per cent more than the market price for a home near popular schools.

He said: "There is no doubt whatsoever that catchment areas affect the desirability of property.

"To be close to a popular school with a good reputation parents are willing to pay a premium.

"It's no longer location, location, location, it's school, school, school."

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Natalie, Bishopston

    Wednesday, June 03 2009, 2:43PM

    “Hannah - contact Evening Post (Linda Tanner) she may be interested in your story and continued BCC negligence. It seems bad press for the council seems to get results these days!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Andrew, Bishopston

    Monday, June 01 2009, 3:07PM

    “Thanks Nat. I will certainly get involved. FYI my personal concern is for admissions in Sept 2011 but keen to help and to try and get solutions asap.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by hannah, bristol

    Friday, May 29 2009, 8:22PM

    “Liz - yes we are on waiting lists - but apparently those are not available to members of the public, the tax payer! BCC just keep saying they are still working on the waiting lists and each week tell me to call back the next week - total lack of communication. The whole thing really troubles me as we have 2 younger children as well...”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Nat, Bishopston

    Friday, May 29 2009, 8:38AM

    “Hi Andrew,

    BPAC 0r Bristol Primary Admissions Crisis Group was started earlier this year, by parents offered no reception places. This prodominantly was Bishopston parents as lots of us lived in the same area, but branched out to help other people in other areas with similar problems. This also put us in contact with Long Ashton action group and liased with AG-RO (Sefton park residents association) and St Pauls Unlimited and of course Bristol Evening Post and a host a lovely councillors/officials.

    Parents waiting for places have now got offers from local schools but many members of BPAC had children aged 3 and were fighting for longer term changes ie. Admission Sept 2010 (same as you).

    BPAC has a web site try B PAC with a space and contact like minded folk to sort out next year if you wish -
    Good Luck.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Andrew, Bishopston

    Wednesday, May 27 2009, 4:05PM

    “Agreed - this does nothing for the spaces problem. I can certainly see the logic for why this was done but interestingly doesn't it make the problem worse on west side of Glos Rd? Can someone tell me how to get involved in the Bristol Primary Allocation Crisis Group?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Liz, N Bristol

    Wednesday, May 27 2009, 1:40PM

    “Hannah - are you on waiting lists for N. Bristol schools?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Bunk, N. Bristol

    Wednesday, May 27 2009, 1:38PM

    “Hannah is correct. What a shame that BCC believes that scrapping the catchment areas will make any difference at all.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by hannah, bristol

    Wednesday, May 27 2009, 8:10AM

    “this is not really the issue... the issue is that there are not enough local school places in north bristol. the other main issue is that there are too many siblings taking up places who don't live anywhere near their schools. they should not allow children to move into junior schools unless they live in the area as parents are using this as a means to get their younger children into reception classes. yet again, the LEA has got it wrong - they are missing the point.

    all this means in effect is that people will have to live EVEN CLOSER to the schools they want their children to attend, and will puch property prices up even further. as for the estate agent quoted in this article, he is living in cloud cuckoo land if he thinks that it is only a 10% premium - it is way more than that!

    and might i also suggest that the LEA deal with the outstanding issues for this year before they start on next year. there are still children without acceptable places for this year, they still have no information on their website, they still don't answer the phone when you ring admissions, there is still no communication with parents.

    I for one, still don't know where my son will be going in September!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters