New Bristol bus route revealed

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Details for a high-speed bus route through the city centre have been revealed – but so has news of spiralling costs.

A Rapid Transit bus link from Ashton Vale to Temple Meads was initially expected to cost £35 million and be complete by 2013.

But a report going before the West of England Partnership (WEP) on Thursday shows that the scheme is now likely to cost £47.3 million – £12.3 million or 35 per cent more than planned.

And up to 10 per cent of the final cost which had been expected to come from the private sector could now have to be met by taxpayer, as the recession hits developers who were due to contribute.

The economic downturn means that funds pledged by developers in return for being given planning permission – legal deals known as "section 106 agreements" – may no longer be forthcoming as building projects are cancelled.

So the funds, which could have totalled £4.73 million, will instead need to come from the transport funds of the WEP – council taxpayers' money from Bristol, South Gloucestershire, B&NES and North Somerset.

In early December the city was given its first view of the kind of vehicles which may run along the high-speed route.

Now further details have been released about how the bendy buses will travel through the city.

The preferred route will involve an anti-clockwise loop around the city centre, after crossing the Floating Harbour over a new bridge by Prince Street.

This would take the buses, which will travel along guided busways for much of the route but can also ride on normal roads, along The Grove, up Redcliffe Way and on to Temple Circus.

Planners are still discussing the possibility of creating a new transport interchange next to the existing Temple Meads Station, on a piece of land by the Friary known as Plot 6.

From there, the most likely route is along Temple Way and Bond Street, down the Haymarket, Rupert Street and Colston Avenue, to Broad Quay and back up Prince Street.

Alternative options which could involve travelling through the Cabot Circus development or going through Broadmead at Union Street, are still being considered.

The bus would be given priority through the city centre to ensure fast, reliable services but the exact nature of these measures are still be worked out.

The report will be presented to the WEP by Bristol City Council's head of transport operations Colin Knight on Thursday.

It says: "The estimated cost of the route is £47.3 million with contingencies.

"Of this, a minimum of 10 per cent has to be funded locally.

"Originally this was envisaged to be entirely achievable through section 106 contributions, but the economic downturn may impact on the timing of some developments.

"It may be appropriate for authorities to underwrite any possible shortfall through the Joint Local Transport Plan Integrated Transport Allocation."

The councillor in charge of transport in Bristol, Mark Bradshaw, said the increased costs were the result of changes made to the scheme after public consultation was carried out towards the end of last year.

He said: "These changes include an integrated plan for the route to serve the proposed stadium for Bristol City Football Club, additional works for services to run via Redcliffe to Temple Meads, increased provision for environmental mitigation works such as vegetation planting and a new and improved interchange at Temple Meads Station."

Mr Bradshaw said work to plan the possible routes the BRT system would take through the city centre was still being done but there were a limited number of options. He said there was a possibility measures to give public transport priority over other traffic, already in place in the form of bus lanes and devices to give buses priority at traffic lights, could be expanded.

Mr Bradshaw said he was working to ensure the scheme, first mooted more than three years ago, was up and running as soon as possible.

He said: "I can understand the impatience of many people keen to get BRT in place and making a difference.

"As Executive Member, I'm grateful for the hard work that's been put into getting the proposals to this stage and for the constructive comments received during the recent consultation.

"Above all, I'll do all I can to secure this much needed public transport investment for Bristol and the city region."

The Rapid Transit services are due to run through the city every five minutes, following a course from the Long Ashton park-and-ride site, past Silbury Road, across the railway line from Portishead via a new bridge, next to Cumberland Road and alongside the Floating Harbour. Plans are also in the pipeline for an extension leading to Bristol International Airport. Work on the route, the first of several to be created across the Bristol area, is due to start in 2010 and should be complete by 2013.

20
Tweet this article
Report

20 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Nigel, Steve

    Wednesday, January 21 2009, 10:34AM

    “No Liverpool doesnt have an existing tram scheme but it does have Mersey rail, which is a urban rail network, the biggest in the UK outside London. This rail system runs in a system of underground tunnels in the city centre which act like an underground loop with underground stations like London. This is a transport executive for Merseyside and they can raise captial themselves against existing services, its Merseyrail that is proposing the tram lines to compliment the rail network.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by ABP, Bristol

    Tuesday, January 20 2009, 11:05PM

    “Perhaps Leonard Nimoy can open this proposel monorail!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Steve, Bristol

    Tuesday, January 20 2009, 9:26PM

    “Nigel,

    I take your point that it's far easier to attract funding to expand existing schemes, but the fact remains that Liverpool was invited to resubmit its proposal for a tram late last year by the DfT - they don't have an existing scheme.

    If the only thing we can do is bang our drums and moan, then that's what we should do, in addition to acting through the ballot box.

    Our city has had the roughest of rough deals with regards to transport for decades - the worst of any major UK city. To accept these useless First-driven proposals would be the final surrender and will do nothing to alleviate congestion or make public transport more affordable.

    For these reasons alone we should resist them.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Matt, Bristol

    Tuesday, January 20 2009, 6:43PM

    “A tram would be better, but why not a monorail? Then you don't have to find room on the ground to shoehorn it in, which would allow a much greater choice of routes. It could go right through the Centre. A monorail can handle hills that leave trams struggling - useful in Bristol! It's also one of the safest forms of transport there is - it can't derail or hit ground traffic.
    They've had commuter monorails for years in a number of cities in Japan, new systems are being built in India and Korea.
    If Brunel was alive today I'm pretty sure it would be his solution to the problem, so why are we being fobbed off with this half-baked rubbish?

    You can put lipstick on a pig...”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Simon, Bristol

    Tuesday, January 20 2009, 3:48PM

    “Steve: "trots off like good little mice". Maybe it was Bradshaw spotted in McD's...”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article