Muslim in Bristol: Compassion is essential
LAST week, I wrote about the issue of forced marriages and the definition of what amounts to a forced marriage.
Unsurprisingly, it caused quite a stir.
-

While most of my community were very supportive and relieved that the issue was being highlighted – especially the young people – some people were inevitably critical.
Their objection is two-fold: firstly, they think I should not be raising such issues in public, and secondly they object to my definition of a forced marriage.
I'll say it again – a forced marriage is where either party is compelled for whatever reason, no matter how slight, to accept a marriage against their own free will.
By raising such issues and standing out firmly against them, I'm not betraying my faith or my community.
On the contrary, I'm standing up for both of these.
In the Koran, chapter four, verse 35, God clearly says: "O ye who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even if it be against your own selves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor, for God can best protect both. Follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest ye swerve (from justice), and if ye distort (justice) or decline to do justice, verily God is well aware of all that ye do."
Forced marriages are a crime against Islam and basic human compassion.
While I'm on the subject, there is another related issue which also needs to be addressed – domestic violence.
It's a problem in society in general. In the UK, you are most likely to be a repeat victim of crime if you have been a victim of domestic violence. That's more than any other type of crime in the UK.
There are many trusted and capable organisations working to tackle domestic violence in wider society, but I will address it from an Islamic perspective.
For Muslims, the example to follow is that of the Prophet Muhammad. One day, when he was told about a man who beat his wife, he stood up in the congregation and asked out loud: "How can you beat your wives like animals during the day and then expect to lie with them in the night?"
He endlessly encouraged men to be kind and good towards their wives and families, saying: "The best of you in faith is the one who is best and kindest to his family, and I am the best among you to my family."
On yet another occasion, he said: "O people, your wives have a certain right over you and you have certain rights over them. Treat them well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers."
He encouraged men to help their wives, saying: "Helping wives (in their domestic work) earns (men) the reward of charity."
He also assured women, adding: "O women, the pious among you will enter Paradise before pious men."
And there are countless other narrations I could use to further illustrate my point. Prophet Muhammed never raised his voice or spoke in anger against his wives, let alone raised his hand.
For Muslims, he is our example. Attending the mosque, giving in charity, fasting – all of it is pointless if you then go home and beat your wife.







3 Comments
by Martin, Knowle,Bristol
Wednesday, December 31 2008, 1:39PM
“Wow, this comment is so old I thought it was dead, but Anthony James took over a month to gather his wits to reply, I guess an attempt to massage his own ego without anyone noticing. I will reply anyway.
You are spot on in just one of your observations. I mistakenly assumed that Farooq owned his own copy but of course he could have borrowed it. It is of course a version of a translation. It is also a version of a holy book of which there are many. With overlapping versions of the same events.
I hope this is dumbed down enough for you. Funny how you knew exactly what book I was talking about though when I mentioned stories and myths.
This may come as a surprise to you but just because someone sees no evidence for any gods that does not make them a BNP member.
You really should see someone about these homophobic outbursts of yours. For goodness sake don't consult a holy book though. That would be really stupid don't you think?.
I read Shindler's Ark. The film would be a let down after that.”
by Anthony James, Bristol
Tuesday, November 25 2008, 6:21PM
“Martin, Knowle, Bristol... entitled to his view but the very nature of his comment suggests he has a hang up about Mr Siddique (probably closet gay in conflict with himself) and, whether he sees it or not, has made himself look stupid with twaddle about 'good grammar does not necessarily make good sense', when failing to qualify the comment! His problem with Farooq is also shown by his referring to Farooq as 'cherry picking from HIS version, etc'. Farooq is quoting from texts that pre-date his existence so they cannot be his version. Get a grip man... if you love him, call him!
By the way Martin... are you on that BNP list by any chance? You seem to be confused between feelings of love towards a 'Muslim' and Islamaphobia. It seems to afflict many of their members. You remind me a bit of that character Roth in Schindler's List!”
by Martin, Knowle,Bristol
Tuesday, October 14 2008, 2:58PM
“Another grammatically sound article from Mr Sidduque as he defends his right to speak out about a moral problem concerning forced marriages, and then addresses domestic violence.
He has every right to talk about these things.
He, thinks both these practises are wrong. I am very pleased to hear it.
But good grammar does not necessarily make good sense.
He again cherry picks quotes from his version of stories and myths dating from the 7th century and earlier to justify his stance, and then expects us to take his reasoning seriously!
Using this kind of logic it is hardly surprising that others come up with other gems from their own adopted myths, or even the same book, and interpret them completely differently. This article is nothing more than a disguised sermon and I wish the B E P would not publish sermons.
In our society forced marriages are, at the least, morally wrong.
Domestic violence is a criminal offence.
Thats it. Obvious. A non story.”