Missing Bristol link needs joined-up thinking
Drive along Hengrove Way from Hartcliffe Way and the dual carriageway suddenly comes to an abrupt halt at a small roundabout.
The wide new road – well, it was new 40 or 50 years ago – should have continued to the A38 but the money dried up and it was never finished.
-
It would have provided the last link for a ring road stretching around the south of the city from the A4 Bath Road.
Instead, we are left worming our way along narrow traffic-clogged residential streets in south Bristol that simply cannot cope with today's volume of vehicles.
Now the politicians, the highways experts and the civil servants are stepping up a gear to get the link built between that miserable roundabout at Cater Road in Bishopsworth and the A370 at Yanley.
The link, expected to cost about £40m, is expected to provide one of the keys to regenerating south Bristol which has suffered from lack of investment because of landlock for decades.
It will also provide easier access to Bristol International Airport and relieve congestion in Barrow Gurney where the road dangerously narrows to a single lane in parts of the village.
It will also help to ease traffic flows for commuters travelling into the city from the south and help football fans reach the proposed new stadium at Ashton Vale if it wins planning permission.
Bristol Lib Dem cabinet councillor Jon Rogers, who is in charge of the council's transport department, said: "We've got excellent transport links in the north of the city but the trouble there has been that it has attracted new investment but the roads cannot cope with the increase in traffic.
"What we need to do is balance the city up so that we have investment south of the city as well."
But a price will have to be paid for the new link which the officials are stressing should be called a link route, not a road, because it will feature other forms of transport.
A rapid transit system – bendybuses running on a dedicated track – will run parallel to most of the new road and wherever possible, there will be a cycleway and footpath.
The experts started off with five possible routes which have now been whittled down to two.
They stress the exact route of the new link has not yet been proposed.
But you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that the route is likely to run between Gatehouse Avenue and Goulston Road before meeting King George's Road.
From there, it is likely to take a path across the green belt to meet the A38 north of Town and Country Lodge Hotel. It would then cut north of the tip at Yanley and meet the A370 Long Ashton bypass at a point near the Bristol end.
The second option (known as the outer route) would sweep much closer to the hotel and then bend south to meet the Long Ashton bypass at the top of the hill where the dual carriageway starts.
The highways experts are currently working on the technical detail of both options and are due to publish their findings next month.
Once we know the proposed routes, there will be a six-week public consultation exercise.
There will be a series of exhibitions and displays in Long Ashton, Ashton Vale, Hartcliffe and Withywood which will give people a chance to examine the proposals and question the experts.
Residents in the area will be leafleted to give them a chance to understand what is proposed.
They will also be urged to post their comments on the website, www.westofengland.org/southbristollink and there will be publicity in the local media.
Community groups and ward councillors will be contacted for their views.
It's worth noting that, whatever route is finally proposed, planning permission will be needed – which will mean a separate round of consultation by the local authorities involved, Bristol City and North Somerset councils.
Details of the exhibitions will be given later.
If all goes according to plan, then a bid for funding will be put before the Department for Transport in March next year.
The aim is to start building the link in 2014-15. It's not yet clear when it might be finished because this depends on which route is chosen.
Both routes have their technical challenges.
The inner route would have to cross the main railway line – probably by using an underpass which would cost an estimated £5.3m – while the outer route would cost much more in land acquisition (£15m compared with £13.7m for the inner route).
What is important to flag up is that the much-talked about link between the Hartcliffe Way roundabout and Hicks Gate roundabout on the Bristol end of the Keynsham bypass is unlikely to go ahead for many years.
There had been suggestions that this final link would provide the last piece of the jigsaw to ease traffic congestion in South Bristol. After all, the A4 Bath Road, Callington Road, and Hengrove Way are hideously busy every day.
But this section of road won't be built in the foreseeable future for several reasons.
First, there is not the political will to see it through. Councillors in B&NES (Bath and North East Somerset) are keen on it because so many of their voters live in the Bath area and travel to work in Bristol each day.
But councillors in Bristol and North Somerset are unlikely to give it support because of its intrusion on the green belt which they know, for them, can only be a vote-loser.
Second, there is the professional argument over making it easier for all of us to travel.
The experts will tell you that we cannot solve this problem by building more roads alone.
What is needed is an integrated transport system which links up roads, buses, rail and other forms of travel such as rapid transit systems (bendybuses), cycleways, park and ride sites and even footpaths.
Part of this equation will see a bendybus route from Long Ashton park and ride, alongside the new South Bristol Link and on to a new terminus at Hengrove. Here, you will be able to get another bendybus service through the city centre to the northern fringe (£163m has already been promised for this north-south route).
The experts believe that travel alternatives such as the bendybus will ease the volume of traffic on our roads because they will provide fast, reliable modes of transport we are prepared to use on a daily basis.
There's a third reason why the proposed stretch of road between the Hartcliffe Way and Hicks Gate roundabouts (Phase Three) has been consigned to the long grass – the small question of money.
The West of England Partnership – a body which represents the four councils in the former Avon area – has drawn up its priority list for transport improvements during the next 10 years.
These include upgrading the Portishead rail link so the line can take passenger services; building the Callington Road link road (a short-cut to ease traffic congestion at the junction with West Town Lane and the A4 Bath Road); a £20m priority list of improvements in Weston-super-Mare; two new park and ride sites; more showcase bus routes; building three rapid transit (bendybus) routes; building the Bristol Metro – a new rail track running north of the city; and a bypass for Junction 21 on the M5 at Weston-super-Mare.
Phase Three of the South Bristol Link Road does not feature on this list.
The fact is that there is not enough money for every project and the wishlist above has been agreed as a result of full support from councillors in all of the four councils in the Bristol area.
This consensus is no mean feat. Yes, these councillors have their own territories to protect and improve but for all of them to agree on projects which are not necessarily in their own area is starting to show the kind of joined-up thinking which is desperately needed if we are to solve Bristol's daily traffic delays.







17 Comments
View all
by MendipMan, Wurzel Country
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 7:11PM
“Bristol is certainly short changed compared to many other areas, especially those in South Wales and the northeast and parts of the northwest of England. It's because Bristol is supposedly a wealthy and economically successful city whereas the likes of Liverpool and Cardiff have to be helped with gravy from the public train.
The result is they have more facilities than we do. Liverpool's arena cost £150 million and was paid for out of public money, including £50 million from the EU. Bristol wanted some public help to bridge part of a £80 million shortfall for its arena and was turned down. Says it all really.
We don't help ourselves either. Unlike nearly all other major cities Bristol has the same boundary as it did nearly fifty years ago. The urban sprawl has spread incessantly since that time.
If Bristol's boundary was extended to take in all the urban area the city would have a bigger voice nationally and there would be no more petty, childish bickering between local councils such as Bristol and South Gloucestershire when anything needs to be done.
Government funding for the tram was lost because Bristol and South Glos argued like children over the location of the northern terminus.
Have one council for Greater Bristol and send the rest of the area back to historic Somerset and Gloucestershire.”
by TimothyB, Upper Knowle
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 2:34PM
“My niece likes the Harbourside ( or is it Habourside Mike ? ). She says that from there she can see the SS Great Britain which was built by Islamabad Brunel. It's only a matter of time....”
by Mike Ford ¿(¿¿¿¿¿)¿, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 2:05PM
“I agree with you completely about the habourside buildings, which are horrible, especially those ones next to the maritime museum that are now held up by planks of wood.
I actually have worked closely with one of the firms that are based in one of the new buildings around Temple Quay and Redcliff, and apparently the buildings there are "Bristol" (according to the architect anyway). Apparently the square, red brick colour building is our trademark. Make of that what you will!”
by Bob de Bilde, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 1:44PM
“Mike,
Yes, you're probably right - it is better than it was before but none of the architecture is particularly striking, impressive or indeed says 'Bristol' to me.
It is better, but still not that great. Other cities have built iconic, prestigous buildings that trumpet their success, ours are anonymous blocks of the same height.
The Harbourside was a missed opportunity, especially this latest phase which belongs in Benidorm”
by Troy, Shenzhen, China (no gaps in the ring roads here)
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 1:43PM
“Typical Bristol, bickering, bleating and debating for years about a gap in the ring road.”
by Mike Ford ¿(¿¿¿¿¿)¿, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 1:02PM
“Bob, you always make excellent comments, but I will pick out one thing if I may- you say that Temple Quay looks like it belongs in the Eastern Bloc. I would say that's slightly unfair, as Redcliff and all round by the station, up to the new Cabots Circus is genuinely nice, clean and modern, and about a billion times nicer than the horrible grey Slough-a-like place it was before.”
by Bob de Bilde, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 12:01PM
“Graeme P,
You've hit the nail on the head.
Bristol gets much, much less funding for its infrastructure than other comparable UK cities, but when it does get the financial green light for a project the authorities then spend years and millions of pounds doing........not a lot.
The pace of infrastructure delivery in this city is absolutely painful. Twelve years into this Government and we still don't have any tangible improvements to our transport infrastructure.
The transport gang down in Wilder St are great at producing pretty pictures, nice animated sequences, CONsultations, reports, newsletters etc, but when you ask them to actually deliver something physical they all either pass out or hide under their desks.
It's just not good enough. For their repeated abject failure, transport chief David Bishop and his cohorts should be sacked. They are quite literally useless.
Bristol has been starved of investment by this Labour Government (and by the Tories before them) and our local council just don't have a clue what to do with the money that they do get.
That's why we have the worst public transport of any British city - with the touted solution being more diesel buses from discredited First Group..
Why we're the only large English city to not have an Arena, or be planning to build one.
That's why we're the largest settlement in the UK without a 50m swimming pool.
That's why our sport and leisure infrastructure is so poor that we can't even host the English Schools' Games without help from the facilities at the University of Bath. This establishment has better sports and leisure facilities than all of Bristol and South Glos combined - shameful.
That's why, instead of an Arena or a Concert Hall, we actually got a new foyer and ticket office for an existing venue - costing an eye-watering £18 million.
That's why the Council is wasting £26 million (and counting) on the Museum of Bristol that no-one in the city appears to actually want. This will become the latest white elephant to grace the Harbourside.
That's why not a single iconic or prestige building has been built in Bristol in my lifetime. The flats in the Harbourside and the offices in Temple Quay could be situated anywhere - Eastern Europe springs to mind.
Go to any other large British city - even Cardiff - and you will see how far they have outstripped Bristol in terms of facilities and infrastructure.
All this guff from the council about Bristol being a 'Great European City' is total nonsense. We've slipped so far down the scale over the past 20 years that we are now competing with the likes of Reading, Swindon, Preston, Derby and Sunderland - not the other major cities that are supposed to be our contemporaries.
All this is down to three things:
1, Totally unfair Government funding, massively favouring Northern cities and the devolved administrations.
2, Incomptentent local leadership with a chronic inability to deliver projects that the city wants and needs.
3, Apathetic, overly laid back attitude of most Bristolians and incomers that have made this city their home.
We'll never get anything is we don't kick up a song and dance about it, but with Bristol's track record, I'm not holding my breath.”
by Mike Ford ¿(¿¿¿¿¿)¿, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 11:45AM
“A superb, well balanced article. Good work on this BEP.”
by colin, Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 11:40AM
“Never mind joined up thinking,lets have a joined up (nearly) ring Road.”
by Grahame P, Central Bristol
Wednesday, October 07 2009, 11:26AM
“Great article BEP and sums up the issues nicely. The article put its finger on something when it observed 'you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that the route is likely to run between Gatehouse Avenue and Goulston Road'. This is true. But it hasn't stopped 5 routes being explored before being whittled down to 2; a bunch of highways experts working for yet another month on BOTH routes; to be followed by a 6 week consultation exercise; which will be followed by exhibitions and displays; then followed by community consultations. All this before a funding application has been submitted and detailed planning consent sought....
¿.. when all we actually need (and have needed for years) is a short bit of damned road.”