Mayoral spending is not the top issue
IT WAS very interesting to discover how much our mayoral candidates are spending on their election campaigns. During yesterday's Post hustings at Arnos Vale, the candidates revealed a huge range of expenditure – from Stoney Garnett's £160 to George Ferguson's £50,000.
Ultimately, the disparities highlight the difference between independent candidates standing on their own means and political candidates with the party machine – and financial power – behind them.
But should we judge any of the candidates by how much money they've spent on trying to win power?
George Ferguson admitted that much of the £50,000 came from his own pocket. That might earn him criticism from those who deride him as a wealthy member of Bristol's Society of Merchant Venturers.
Dyson DC50i - Bagless upright vacuum cleaner - BALL Technology -...
View detailsThisi is Dyson's smallest upright vacuum cleaner with the performance of a full size upright machine. The DC50i has Dyson's most advanced cleaner head technology and 2 Tier RadialTM cyclones.
Terms: LIMITED STOCK OFFER. FREE delivery to most UK postcodes - Next working day dispatch.
Contact: 01664 491439
Valid until: Monday, May 27 2013
But it also might win him praise from voters who see him as prepared to put his money where his mouth is for the city.
And Labour candidate Marvin Rees might also be lauded for making the point that, without the party to provide the £20,000 needed to run his campaign, he would not have been able to afford to stand as a candidate.
Candidates should not be judged by what they say about themselves or their own literature. Or by how much they spent printing it. They should be judged on how convincing they are as a potential leader of this great city.




Comments
by Brizz_Tony
Thursday, November 01 2012, 6:37PM
“I have no problem with this being democracy for the rich or the party machine so far as the candidates are concerned. I don't want to see my tax or council tax being spent on providing free publicity for nutters or extremists. The right to vote is truly democratic, and anyone who doesn't exercise it has no right to grumble.
The deposit for parliamentary elections was introduced to stop soldiers and sailors standing, so they could get out of the army as candidates, who were exempt from service. The deposit for this campaign is £500, which if you haven't got it, and are a good candidate, will surely come from friends and supporters. Poor people can therefore apply, although if they are poor, that would be for a reason. No job, no qualifications, been made bankrupt because of not being good with money - not who we want in charge of a £1 million per day budget.
I also have no problem with Goerge Ferguson being a former lib dem, no more than I would have a problem if he was a former drunkard - as with all the other candidates, I shall make my mind up by my judgment of what he is now. Sticking two fingers up to the Lib Dems seems perfectly sensible to me. Having heard him speak (but not made up my mind yet) he clearly knows what the issues are, and speaks more sense than some of the others (alright, Jon Rogers). His opposition to the stupid £50 million BRT2 route is commendable, as is Tim Collins - Tim has actually signed the petition at
https://http://tinyurl.com/cb2ptdh
Don't sneer at someone just because he isn't poor and unsuccessful. He or she may still have the city's best interests at heart.”
by matic_113
Thursday, November 01 2012, 2:14PM
“by Ruskin09 - which Independent are you voting for instead?
I doubt if he wins he will not have a majority Lib dem team unlike Marvin labour only policy.”
by Ruskin09
Thursday, November 01 2012, 1:47PM
“I have grown tired of Fergusons claims to be independant, if there was any votes in being a Liberal Democrat, he would still be a member, its only because they are a political liability that ha chose to ditch them, anyone who can dip into their own pocket to the amout he has must be totally out of touch with the problems or ordinary Bristolians.”
by matic_113
Thursday, November 01 2012, 10:50AM
“hahahaha Rees £20,000 - i suspect the real total is many times higer than that.”
by DennisB2012
Thursday, November 01 2012, 10:02AM
“I now discover that the "details" of each candidate's expenditure - except for the Conservative's (who had left the meeting by that point!) - are in another sub-heading of this web site.
But why is the Post cluttering its own pages with repeats and summaries and videos of the same story. Let's see just ONE clear article on each subject.”
by DennisB2012
Thursday, November 01 2012, 9:35AM
“And what did the other candidates say they would be spending?
As not every reader attended the meeting, why cannot the Post give the complete story - not just the bits that suit their position on this matter.”
by charliecycle
Thursday, November 01 2012, 8:53AM
“But, of course, most people don't have £50k to spend on an election
It sim0ply proves that this form of 'democracy' is for the rich or the party machine
Poor people need not apply”