BREAKING NEWS
 

Major blow for rail link funding in Portishead

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, November 01, 2011
Profile image for The Bristol Post

The Bristol Post

PLANS to reopen Portishead’s desperately needed rail link have received a major blow – after a bid for £43 million of government funding for the project was turned down.

North Somerset Council learned this week that its multi-million-pound bid to the government’s Regional Growth Fund for cash to open the defunct rail link had been refused.

It had been hoped – if the bid was successful – to get passenger trains running out of Portishead from as early as 2015.

Council leaders have said that, although the news the bid had been unsuccessful was a blow, it in no way meant the end of the road for the railway reopening project.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013

And they said they still plan to bid for cash for the scheme from future Major Transport Programmes or any replacement programmes promoted by the government.

The authority will continue to work with Network Rail on its Guide to Rail Investment Project (GRIP) studies on the feasibility of reopening the railway and look at other possible funding streams. North Somerset Council deputy leader Councillor Elfan Ap Rees said: “Admittedly this is a blow to our plans to reopen the rail link. But it is a setback and it is certainly not the end of the road.

“We knew it was only an outside chance of us getting the funding from the growth fund. If we had been successful it would have meant we could have got rail services running out of Portishead more quickly.

“However we will be continuing to work with Network Rail to look at alternative funding streams.

“The local transport fund is currently fully subscribed and we will be looking to make a bid for funding at the next round of allocations, which will probably take place next year with the money possibly coming available around 2014.

“As a council we are still very much committed to reopening the Portishead rail link.”

It is estimated that the total cost of reopening the rail link would be around £50 million.

A further £4.8 million needed for the project would be funded from council resources and planning agreement money earmarked from developments in Portishead.

Studies have revealed that if the line was to open, trains could travel between Portishead and Temple Meads in Bristol in 17 minutes – slashing the current journey time by car.

Members of the Gordano Councils Transport Group, which was set up to campaign for the reopening of the railway, said they were ‘deeply disappointed’ at the news.

Group founder and Portishead councillor David Pasley said: “I am deeply disappointed this bid for funding has been turned down.

“Portishead has grown massively over the years and is due to grow by a further 40 per cent by 2015.

“Good transport in and out of the town are essential and should have been put in place before all the new developments were allowed.

“It is now important that all other funding streams are explored for this project.

“There is strong public and commercial support for the reopening of the rail link out of Portishead.”

The work to reopen the railway would include re-laying the three miles of redundant track between Portishead and Portbury and building a new station.

A new road bridge would be built over the railway at Quays Avenue in Portishead and a station would have to be built on land already earmarked at Harbour Road.

Money would also have to be spent on upgrading the six-mile section of the track between Portbury Dock as currently it is not of a good enough standard to run passenger services.

The track is currently only used by freight trains which carry coal and cars from Royal Portbury Dock to locations around the country.

The track, which was reopened in the 1990s, is capable of taking trains at speeds of up to 30mph, while passenger trains operate at speeds of up to 60mph.

The existing track could be used, but major realignment work would be needed and some new lines would have to be laid.

Further work is also needed at Pill tunnel to improve the drainage and lines to allow passenger trains through there safely.

The reopening of the railway would mean an end to the gridlock often seen on the Portbury Hundred – the main route out of Portishead.

Brunel first proposed the line in 1839 but it was actually built by the Bristol and Portishead Pier and Railway Company and opened on April 18 1867.

It was laid as a single line broad gauge branch running from Bristol to Portishead.

The line was closed to passenger traffic in September 1964 and freight in 1981 and lay unused apart from the occasional steam specials.

Among the funding options for further exploration are the re-letting of the Great Western franchise from 2013 and the proposed recently announced Local Transport Consortiums. The council will make the case for the scheme with the Department for Transport to identify a funding package to take the scheme forward.

The next major milestones for the scheme are to compile a detailed scheme business case, to commence GRIP stage 4 with Network Rail and to pursue planning consents to build and operate the rail line.

Despite the government’s refusal over the Portishead rail link, there was some success locally in yesterday’s funding announcement.

Airbus said Filton and the wider aerospace community would benefit after it was given cash to underpin its engineering operations in the region.

The company would not reveal the size of the grant, and said technical details were still being finalised.

Mark Stewart, general manager of the Filton site, said: “This announcement is very good news for Airbus which reinforces the position of Filton as the jewel in the crown of UK aviation engineering.

“By investing in engineering skills we will maintain our position as a world leader in aviation excellence.”

Meanwhile, City of Bristol College was part of a South West consortium that secured more than £1.25m to train people in green technologies.

It is hoped that the cash will help create more than 500 jobs across the region by tapping into the government’s carbon reduction targets.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for mitresk

    by mitresk

    Friday, November 04 2011, 4:57PM

    “Personally, I would like to see our local MP Dr Fox stand up in parliament and argue the need for proper transport infrastructure around the Portishead area, rather than simply accept it. He represents us, not 'Call me Dave'.
    He has pledged his full support to the people of Backwell and surrounding areas regarding the pylons, but the transport situation is far more pressing and needs sorting, and not simply having countless 'feasability studies' or other such obstacles placed in the way. It's obviously feasible, there's been a railway line there for about 100 years...
    Dr Fox now has a lot more time on his hands to actually support his constituents correctly, and supporting a campaign against a blot on the landscape against constant misery of commuting because of a lack of support and foresight in easing the congestion by opening the line is in my mind, not what I expect of our MP, he should be lobbying parliament on our behalf to think again. This debacle over the railway line has gone on for years and years and is getting no closer.
    Perhaps our MP should either move to Portishead or would like to sit on the A369 in rush hour out of Portishead in the morning, or at the Easton in Gordano/Abbots Leigh side on the evening to assess whether installing bus lanes, traffic lights and moving the bottleneck on the junction 19 roundabout a few hundred yards will be a suitable solution. He may then be more vocal in fighting for additional ways in easing congestion.
    Somehow, I have visions of the money being spent on the 'improvements' at junction 19 and surrounding areas being a similar red herring to the lights in Portishead.
    In my village of Pill we are being informed that certain buses may be cancelled because of cutbacks, and that affects Portishead likewise, so somehow the need for a 'congestion easing bus lane' is a little pointless, especially when the service is not the best in the first place.
    I suppose next year, once it's all up and running, we will know the truth...”

  • Profile image for Magrathea2011

    by Magrathea2011

    Wednesday, November 02 2011, 11:05AM

    “If use is to be really encouraged for this unfortunate line (to Portishead), then perhaps a Park and Ride could also be incorporated near the motorway junction, and the link from Temple Meads (a la bendy wendy bus) could be properly designed that actually integrates with the station and the City Centre ! Also, the cost! As stated in other posts, it must be an attempt to dissuade the Government from supporting it.

    Like BAE and their disinformation re Filton Airfield's costs - let's see the Accounts!”

  • Profile image for Erinaceus

    by Erinaceus

    Wednesday, November 02 2011, 9:16AM

    “@Alpin

    Dead right, particularly considering that most of the track is already in place to a sufficient standard to take heavy freight trains.

    IIRC, the Ebbw Vale line was reinstated from scratch for not much more than half that amount. I wonder how much of that money is going to lawyers, accountants, managers, and straight into FGW's back pocket?”

  • Profile image for Alpin

    by Alpin

    Wednesday, November 02 2011, 8:28AM

    “£43 million! "wow gov, that sounds a bit steep..." We are only talking about a simple railway line. What is the price per kilometre in other parts of Europe? Please go back and do your sums again, only this time get rid of the costs for offices, computers, personal assistants, accommodation. And if you are still struggling go talk to the volunteers at Bitton railway,, where a similar length of line was raised through selling cups of tea...”

  • Profile image for Pipsbeard

    by Pipsbeard

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 9:05PM

    “Hilarious news this. The poor old rail nut jobs who think a railway line to serve Portishead will somehow cure the congestion problems of the whole of Bristol must be weeping tonight. Thank God that the money has been diverted to something far more worthwhile. Even better that nothing can happen before 2014! By that time rail fares will be even higher and the majority of the public will realise that rail travel is for the wealthy only. I'm now off to polish my lovely new car!”

  • Profile image for huntye

    by huntye

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 8:48PM

    “im sure mr landsdown would bankroll the train lin e to portishead as it would be in his interest to fund it as part of the new stadium at ashton vale ?”

  • Profile image for Truth24

    by Truth24

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 7:08PM

    “The lack of a user feasibility study by groups connected with the railway initiative may well have hampered this bid. Nobody has ever been able to explain why this vital research has not been undertaken. The first step perhaps.........or would the results indicate that there would be insufficient support? There is only one way to find out!”

  • Profile image for rocketbob

    by rocketbob

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 6:13PM

    “Millions unemployed, but this government seems unable or unwilling to spend any money on construction or projects which would benefit people long term and help employment in the short term.”

  • Profile image for Erinaceus

    by Erinaceus

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 5:55PM

    “Quite unbelieveable. Once again, central Government treats the South West as the poor relative, while pouring out millions on Crossrail and HS1. I suppose they think we all drive from farm to farm on our tractors, with straws between our teeth.

    And, just for vrtsl36l and davegould23, the great advantage of trains is that they don't cause, and are not held up by, road congestion. As an example, the train from Avonmouth to Clifton Down takes 12 minutes while the bus takes 29 minutes. That's less than half the time, for those who are a little hard of thinking.”

  • Profile image for vrtsl36l

    by vrtsl36l

    Tuesday, November 01 2011, 4:55PM

    “I'm glad the funding has been refused. The line would only benefit a small number of people who have made a life choice to move to a giant cul-de-sac and then wonder why it's congested. Live closer to where you work or expect a bit of inconvenience if you choose not to.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article