Lib Dems storm to Bristol election victory
The Liberal Democrats stormed to an historic victory in the local elections in Bristol.
They took overall control of the city council on a night that saw Labour suffer one of their most humiliating defeats in living memory.
-

Lib Dems storm to Bristol election victory
The Lib Dems gained four seats which took their total to 36 while the Tories also gained four to make them the official opposition with 17 seats.
Labour lost eight of the ten seats they were defending which means they are now in third place with 16 seats in the council chamber. The Greens have one seat.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
It is believed to be the first time since before the Second World War that Labour have suffered so badly.
The Lib Dems’ victory means an end to Bristol’s “hung” council after six years with no party in overall control.

Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg visited Bristol today to congratulate members of the party.
There were cheers and rapturous applause from the jubilant party members at the Council House.
Mr Clegg made speeches to the Bristol councillors about what the win means for the Liberal Democrats and Labour.
He then took time to speak to the councillors who had won seats as the party took 36 of Bristol’s 70 seats.
Lib Dem leader Barbara Janke said the result meant they now had a clear mandate to forge ahead with their policies.
She said: “This is a big night in Bristol’s politics.
“It’s a big achievement and I think it gives us a vote of confidence by people in the city to give the leadership it needs and allow us to achieve some of the things which we believe need to be done.”
Bristol West Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams, who used to be the party’s Bristol leader, said: “When I was leader of the group in 1995-97, there were only nine of us and Labour had more than 50 councillors.
“Now they are in third place which is an extraordinary turn of events.”
Labour leader Helen Holland said: “This was always going to be a very difficult night for us.
“We always suffer when there is a poor turnout and we have seen an unprecedented set of circumstances which has seen people looking for somewhere to make a protest vote.”
She said the Lib Dems now had “nowhere to hide” because they had a clear majority and she added: “It will be interesting to see what they stand for.”
Tory leader Richard Eddy said: “Labour is in complete freefall. The party which ruled Bristol for more than 30 years has been reduced to third-party status.
“It’s unprecedented in recent Bristol’s politics.
“It has to be seen, not only as a rejection of Gordon Brown but also what Labour has failed to do for Bristol.”
One of the biggest scalps of the night was in Southmead where Labour’s deputy leader Peter Hammond lost his seat.
He said: “Obviously it is a big personal disappointment but the truth of it is that however good you are as a local representative, you are very much subject to national politics.”
Only two Labour councillors managed to hang on to their seats.
They were Ron Stone in St George West and Brenda Hugill in Lawrence Weston who managed to hold her seat by just nine votes.
In Horfield and Kingsweston, the Labour councillors defending their seats – Rosalie Walker and Judith Price – were both knocked back into third place.
The Tories took Avonmouth, Frome Vale, Henbury and St George East – all from Labour.
Local elections were not being held in North Somerset, South Gloucestershire or Bath and North East Somerset (Banes).
This is because they hold all-out elections every four years.
In Bristol, a third of the seats are contested every year.




Comments
by Christina, Bristol
Saturday, June 06 2009, 7:05PM
“Gertbigwheels smaller parties get less vote because they are smaller parties. The clue is in the name. They only appeal to a very small minority, in many cases the stupid. As is your comments on immigrants. What has LIb?Dem council got to do with immigration? A parties stance on such matters is a central government issue, not local council. SInce they are highly unlikely to get into government you and your small mind need not worry. Look up the Conseravtive manifesto if you want to see who is next in power.”
by Ben, Clifton
Friday, June 05 2009, 11:01PM
“Peter Hammond said, Obviously it is a big personal disappointment but the truth of it is that however good you are as a local representative, you are very much subject to national politics.¿
Perhaps, Mr Hammond, the people in your ward just... got fed up with you.”
by gertbigwheels, south bristol
Friday, June 05 2009, 10:50PM
“Bad news.If you think Labour are soft on migrants and pc policies.The Libs will look after every one bar there own.The media is to blame.They have a downer on smaller parties.The message never gets through because powerful media people don't want you to hear it.Bristol will be worse off.Democracy killed off by media propaganda.”
by Bristolbelle, Shirehamptom
Friday, June 05 2009, 8:27PM
“The is no denyintg that Laboutr has been bad for education in Bristol. But when the Lib Dems were running the council last time they shut our swimming pool and sports centre. I did NOT vote for them, but I did vote. I don't beleive there is a credible party at all at present, and have long felt there should be a box for "none of the above" so people can demonstrate thier willingness to be politically active but register thier disatisfaction too. Mine was most definitely a protest vote, marginally better than not bothering, or spoiling the voting paper bot of which I have done in the past. But certainly not a choice I was happy making. I also beleive voting, or at least registereing a void vote should be mandatory. Too many people can nlot be bothered to make any political judgement at all, if voting were mandatory it would mean they at least had to make some effort to make a choice, and would hopefully at leat read the drivel we get through our letterboxes if not go one stepf further and actually research party policy etc. Just think if we were more politically conscious and kept our MP's busier they would not have so much time on thier hands to award themselves pay rises and go shopping!”
by Graeme, Knowle
Friday, June 05 2009, 8:26PM
“I'm gald at last someone has overall control. I couldn't care who it was that got into power as long as they get on and do something for this city rather than bicker. One of the first things should be to change the way the way local elections are held here so they can concentrate on a decent lenght term in office.
Also, living in the south of the city it would also be refreshing to see money spent in the south where it is sometimes needed to attract economic growth rather than wasted in the north of the city to improve paving or old fashioned street lights.”
by Debbzz, FromeVale
Friday, June 05 2009, 6:25PM
“The vote is over - end off - discussion over.
To all those that actually bothered to vote - I hope your party won.
Mine did but it didn't influence the outcome.
That said - lets give the Lib Dem's a chance - if they are local people who listen to their constituents and with this new majority to push changes through - maybe they will do a good job - everyone deserves a chance - and - they did win!!!”
by Malcy, Yate
Friday, June 05 2009, 4:58PM
“Steve, if more people voted then maybe it would be a different result. Who will ever know. But the option to vote was there for the majority of us and the majority didn't bother. The LibDems arent in control with only a few thousand supporters, they had the majority of any party from votes cast by people who could bother to be part of the political process. I would suggest the other many thousands who didn't vote really cant be bothered either way who gets in amongst the main parties or if they truly did they would vote. Your comments are niave at best, plain dumb at worst.”
by m, knowle
Friday, June 05 2009, 4:56PM
“I cannot see what is disasterous about having a Council who have a good majority, who have run the job well despite not being a majority and who do not throuw toys out of the pram when decisions do not go their way.
It was not them who made the stupid decision to cut Infant and Junior schools only to find there is a shortage of places.
It was not them who cut places in Residential Homes and careres to look after the elderly in their homes.
It was them who took on board the refuse problem and made a workable solution. After all it was an EU decision to fine Councils who produced too much landfill.
It was them who pushed ahead the new Hospital in South Bristol despite Labour faffing around.
I could continue but no doubt these comments will be subject to the usual derision that appear only to frequently from people who do not understand the electoral system in this country or who do not practise ther right to a vote”
by Simon, Bristol
Friday, June 05 2009, 4:23PM
“Well, I'm going to look on the bright side and not write anyone off until they've had a chance to prove themselves.
As for the turnout, I spoke to an officer outside my polling station (Tudor Rd, Easton) at 10pm and she was flabbergasted by the turnout. There were queues all evening, right up until it closed, so I think we got a fairly representative result.
Usual cynical suspects on here - sometimes I wonder if Bristolians actually want to join the 21st century and use the council as an excuse.
Give the council a chance and see what they can do.”
by K. Martinez, Bristol
Friday, June 05 2009, 3:52PM
“At least Libs are better than Labour, but not much better. Their main vote has always been a protest vote, from anti Socialist and Tory voters. They were a disaster in North Somerset and many other areas.”