Leader of Bristol City Council: 'Let us be clear: We favour new stadium'
DEAR Sir,
I am deeply concerned about the level of bullying – intense, sustained, deliberate bullying – to which councillors have been subjected in the aftermath of last Wednesday's decision on Sainsbury's Ashton Gate application.
-

Leader of Bristol City Council Barabar Janke
A witch hunt has been launched in the press and slanderous lies have been published and repeated on the internet. The councillors have also been targeted personally in vicious emails and threatening phone calls.
Members of the development control committee are not mandated by their political groups on the council. Their function is quasi-judicial and planning law dictates that they make their decisions solely on the merits of the case before them and in good faith.
If on this occasion there was an attempt to influence their decision, it was made by the press – no one else!
A wild hysteria has been whipped up against these councillors and it has been done in an attempt to browbeat them into submitting to the will of the football club and its wealthy chairman. This is an extremely disturbing attack on the democratic process.
Let me be clear. The council, the Liberal Democrat administration and individual councillors have been characterised – irresponsibly and without regard to the facts – as the enemies of Bristol City's plans. Nothing could be further from the truth.
● We are in favour of the new stadium. We're backing it financially.
● We are in favour of the World Cup bid. Bristol City Council has led the bid.
● We are in favour of a new music arena. The Lib Dem administration has called – from the start of this project – for an arena to be included.
If we opposed the project in any way, would we have:
● Agreed to hand over more than £4 million of land to the football club in return for community benefits, including access to sporting facilities?
● Made concessions on the normal requirement for section 106 payments?
● Pumped £250,000 of council funds – and hundreds of hours of officer time and effort – into the 2018 World Cup bid?
● Backed this year's World Cup by screening matches in Queen Square at a cost of up to £80,000?
It's not for me to speak for the development control committee. But it should be remembered that they did pass plans for the new stadium at Ashton Vale earlier this year. Is that an indication of prejudiced opposition to City's plans? It's nothing of the kind.
I am grateful to the Evening Post – which has so strongly demonstrated its interest in these matters over the last few days – for allowing me to put the council's position.
Men and women stand for the council because they want a role in public life. They fully expect to be accountable to the electorate, their decisions carefully scrutinised by press and public.
But what has happened over the last few days has not been an exercise in holding councillors to account. It has been a naked attempt to frighten individuals into doing the bidding of certain interests. We see this as a threat to proper and considered decision-making, which is wholly unacceptable.
Barbara Janke, Leader of the Council







63 Comments
View all
by Luke, Bristol
Wednesday, July 28 2010, 4:50PM
“More smoke-screen nonsense from our inept politicians, akin to the ridiculous comments of Westminster politicians complaining about so-called 'bullying' following the expenses scandal.
Come back to Earth, Bristol Politicians, we want a word with you. You are an utter embarassment.”
by Pete, Stockwood
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 11:27PM
“Greens = no progress?
Jase, sometimes real progress happens because people can't just keep on doing things the same old way, and they're forced to think of new ones. Maybe BCFC should realise that.”
by Billy, no mates
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 11:12PM
“A lot of City fans pretending to care about Bristol. How about the council invest the £4m in our hospitals instead of lining a tax exiles pocket. That WOULD be good for Bristol
Can someone give me a list of what Mr Landsdown has done for Bristol?
When I say done, I mean without making a profit himself.”
by Steve, Central Bristol
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 10:29PM
“Barbara Janke has surprised many, I'm sure, with this very direct statement, and it's good to see. No doubt half the people wanting to "string up" the councillors who voted against the stadium didn't bother to vote themselves in the last election. Either vote them out next time, set up your own Revolutionary Robins private army, or shut up. But don't bully people if you don't like the outcome of democracy.”
by jase, Whitchurch
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 10:14PM
“I think it is you who are deluded. No Sainsburys mean no stadium. Simple as. We all have big supermarkets in our areas now, it is simply a fact of life nowadays. I am sure we would all love to go back to small local stores but those days have gone. It is a very good compromise that benefits the whole area. Let's all get behind this and bring Bristol out of the dark ages. Who knows, we may even get the trams back next!”
by Brian Weeks, Bedminster
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 10:09PM
“City Red, BS3 = Bluebluemoon, # 83”
by cityred, BS3
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 10:05PM
“Oh good grief they are at it here too....spouting half-baked nonsense and Sun/Daily Mail type tripe. This isn't an issue half of the griping posts really care about, it's just an excuse to say vile things purportedly in support of BCFC/against the Gas, or South Bristol or bad mouth anyone talking anything vaguely like sense!
There are BCFC fans, music fans and residents of South Bristol, a lot of whom are 'born amd bred' and often all of those together WHO JUST DON'T WANT AN ENORMOUS SUPERMARKET IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA FOR LOTS OF VERY VALID REASONS ....DO YOU UNDERSTAND? IT'S REALLY VERY SIMPLE! And do you know what? Bristol will survive as city, the club will find a way to sort out a stadium new or old and Ashton Gate won't disappear under a cloud of traffic fumes and the real moaners(described earlier) can move on to the next thing to vent their spleen about.”
by jase, Whitchurch
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 9:29PM
“Greens = no progress. The football club and arena would bring a great deal of income into the area. Hotels, shops, airports, trains, jobs, tax, etc all benefit. Oh but hang on the "greens" don't believe in any of those either. Perhaps we should go back to horse and cart and forget all this progress. Let's all bury our heads in the sand whilst other cities progess. Shame on you all....... Brunel is turning in his grave.”
by Pete, Stockwood
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 5:06PM
“The most disturbing thing about Cllr Janke's statement is that she wrote "I am grateful to the Evening Post ¿ which has so strongly demonstrated its interest in these matters over the last few days ¿ for allowing me to put the council's position."
So the Leader of the City Council had to check out with the main local paper that they'd publish her statement on a matter of major public interest.
Given that the Post has been leading the bullying, from the day it chose to list the key councillors names just before the application was heard, I'm not surprised she should have to take that precaution - but it doesn't say much for the BEP, does it?
In practice, of course, every party on the council has expressed enthusiasm for the city getting a better stadium, and the LibDems have been leading the way with lavish handouts to the club, in terms of relaxed planning requirements and transfers of public land. The only political doubts have been expressed by the Greens, who don't want to see a new stadium plus all the accompanying development built at this particular Green Belt site, who don't go along with throwing public money at a very wealthy man at a time when we're stuck with stark cuts in vital public services, and who don't believe a new hypermarket will do anything to make South Bristol a better place to live.
The club has made a mess of the whole project, and has let Bristol down by being so inept. It should have had a more acceptable Plan B ready, in case any of the flaws in Plan A should be exposed - as one was last week.”
by Pete, Stockwood
Tuesday, July 27 2010, 4:42PM
“Much is being made of the 'foolishness' of one councillor who wanted to know more about the possible terrorist threat to a megastore built on stilts. That was, in fact, Cllr Alexander, who went on to vote FOR the store.”