BREAKING NEWS
 

Labour could ban all its councillors from George Ferguson's new cabinet

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Profile image for The Bristol Post

The Bristol Post

THE Labour Party could tonight scupper elected mayor George Ferguson's vision of a rainbow cabinet to run Bristol.

Just a day after councillors of all parties gathered in the council chamber to express their willingness to work with Mr Ferguson, the Bristol Labour Party will be discussing whether to ban its members from joining his administration.

  1. Mayor of Bristol George Ferguson makes his first address to   the Council Chamber   at City Hall  Picture:   Dave Betts DB2012 1120E-006_C

    Mayor of Bristol George Ferguson makes his first address to the Council Chamber at City Hall

The Post has seen the text of a motion members will be asked to vote on tonight, which says that: "No Labour MP, councillor, PPC (prospective parliamentary candidate), council candidate, officer of either CLPs (Constituency Labour Parties) or the BLP (Bristol Labour Party) or members shall sit in the cabinet of George Ferguson, act as an advisor to George Ferguson or allow themselves as being described as acting as an advisor to George Ferguson."

On his blog, "Turning Bristol Red", Bristol Labour Party chairman Darren Lewis wrote only that the meeting tonight would "decide together how we engage with our new mayor".

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013

Accusing Mr Ferguson of running "an unashamedly anti-Labour campaign" in the run-up to last Thursday's election, he added: "We should not sit in his cabinet but remain a constructive opposition."

A source told The Post that if the motion is passed, it could "tie the hands" of Labour councillors by ordering them not to co-operate with Mr Ferguson. And he said if the councillors refused to abide by the veto it would be referred to the Labour Party nationally.

Mr Ferguson is expected to name a cross-party cabinet next week and Labour city councillors expressed their willingness to work with him in an amicable first full council meeting of his tenure yesterday.

Gone was the back-biting, side-swiping and political point-scoring as Mr Ferguson was politely and warmly welcomed by all parties.

He had a seat at the chamber's top table, but did not chair the meeting at the newly-renamed Bristol City Hall. That task remains with the Lord Mayor, Councillor Peter Main.

Addressing the council, Mr Ferguson said: "I was last in this chamber in 1979 as a rebellious young councillor. I'm now a rebellious old man and I think it's vitally important that we all get on together.

"I think the people of Bristol have spoken. They want a new way of working and I want to regard us as Team Bristol – let's bury our differences. I hold no grudges, I never do."

He later added: "We have severe cuts to make in the budget. We've got to minimise the effect of these cuts in every way we can.

"We're here with only one purpose and that's to look after the welfare of the citizens of Bristol – to spend the money wisely and make sure that we are all proud of the decisions we make in our hearts, and we search our hearts whenever we make a decision for the city of Bristol."

Labour leader Peter Hammond said: "We will, along with you, continue to work in the best interests of the people of Bristol because, after all, that is the role ascribed to the mayor, as it is for local councillors."

Liberal Democrat leader Simon Cook said it was important that members held Mr Ferguson to account in a constructive way, before describing him as a "red-trousered wizard of democracy".

Peter Abraham, on behalf of the Conservatives, offered his party's "warmest congratulations".

"We wanted a mayor, we have a mayor and we will work with the mayor," he said.

Green Party group leader Tess Green described City Hall, Mr Ferguson's new name for the Council House, as "posh and grand", but said she was looking forward to hopefully having a voice on his "rainbow cabinet" and agreed with his idea of closing the city centre to cars one Sunday every month.

In his address, Mr Ferguson said he supported several "good ideas" that emerged from his rival candidates during the mayoral election campaign, including the "living wage" proposed by Labour's mayoral candidate, Marvin Rees.

After an amended motion from Gus Hoyt (Green, Ashley) was voted through, a living wage proposal will go to the authority's human resources committee to produce a report, with a view to it becoming a reality. All parties agreed it would be a good idea to introduce a policy covering all council employees, and possibly sub-contractors, to "ensure low-paid workers earn enough to provide for themselves and their families". That could be as much as £7.45 per hour, compared to the national minimum wage of £6.19 per hour.

Mr Ferguson also said he would like to look at the issues of adult social care again, but would not want to "cause upset" by reversing decisions that have already been made to close certain care homes.

It was not until Mr Ferguson left after more than three hours of the meeting for a prior engagement in Bath that a bad word was said about him.

John Kiely (Lib Dem, Easton), who had been hoping to ask the new mayor about the derelict Elizabeth Shaw Chocolate Factory in Greenbank, said: "It's not acceptable for the mayor just to disappear to Bath."

But Mr Main, said: "I cannot force the mayor to stay. He doesn't have to come in the first place, but I will pass your sentiments on."

Public consultation on next year's budget will begin in January.

Mr Ferguson was not available for comment on the Labour Party motion last night.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Magrathea2011

    by Magrathea2011

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 10:01PM

    “Maybe next year we could look forward to more 'independant' citizens standing for election who are prepared to put the City and its people first ?”

  • Profile image for macadam212

    by macadam212

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 6:04PM

    “Labour - you're fired!”

  • Profile image for MarcusWOT

    by MarcusWOT

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 5:49PM

    “This is precisely why GF won and Labour lost. When will Labour - and other parties - realise that we residents of Bristol are heartily sick of such petty attitudes affecting our everyday lives, invariably for the worse? You are acting like a bunch of spoilt children Mr Lewis, and Bristol deserves better. Until you put the interests of Bristol's residents ahead of your own petty, party political views, you will have a long time on the sidelines. GROW UP!”

  • Profile image for patcrose

    by patcrose

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 5:05PM

    “Labour in opposition...well let's face it..they're used to that both locally and nationally.Long may it remain so !”

  • Profile image for GanjaCrew

    by GanjaCrew

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 4:05PM

    “Bristol firmly under the control of the Merchant Ventures. He is as independent as a Tesco express.... still stuck in the left right fantasy? wondering what a 3 line party whip is? Happy to buy into a false independent who is deeply invested in maintaining the status quo? A mayor represents a centralisation of control. The ineffective split multi party council in bristol and their inability to agree on anything has kept bristol safe from the stupidity/greed/evil intentions of most of our politicians.”

  • Profile image for Mikey_Blake

    by Mikey_Blake

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 3:39PM

    “Well to me that sound like Labour doesn't have the interests of the citizens of Bristol foremost in their thoughts.
    That's why Bristol has been so messed-up in the past.
    The citizens are secondary to Politics.
    Idiots !!!”

  • Profile image for Brennus

    by Brennus

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 3:23PM

    “AndyJRM and Charlespk,

    Let us all hope that George brings his business acumen and ability to his role and does not allow it to be subsumed beneath the crushing wheels of council process - he will be a formidable individual if he manages this.

    Jim Hacker tried it, Sir Humphrey did for him. Let's hope the Sir Humphrey's of BCC do not break the mayoral butterfly on their collective wheels. (to make a total dogs dinner of several metaphors at once..!)”

  • Profile image for Jab_the_cab

    by Jab_the_cab

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 3:17PM

    “Hold the front page: Politicos Serve Only Themselves (not their electorate!)”

  • Profile image for Charlespk

    by Charlespk

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 3:05PM

    “I think you've missed the point of a 'Mayor Elect' Brennus, and maybe so have many of the electorate. . He's more like a President,(IMO) and will be judged by results; not by the continuing bigotries of the elected Counsel. . Bristol has elected a Leader to take charge of and guide all the other elected servants of the people. . That is how he will be judged.”

  • Profile image for ANDYJRM

    by ANDYJRM

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 2:53PM

    “@Brennus - I guess I probably didn't explain it brilliantly - trying to do too many things at once!

    What I'm saying is that hopefully GF bringing a more "businesslike" model of building a team will make for a more efficient process, rather than the wasteful and slow processes we typically see across the public sector, where they have lots of meetings, lots of discussions but do nothing. Then they finally make a decision, it goes wrong, wastes money, and instead of heads rolling and lessons being learned, an extra tier of management committee is overlaid, tasked with overseeing the failing operation. This committee have lots of meetings, lots of discussions but do nothing. Then they finally make a decision, it goes wrong, wastes money, and instead of heads rolling and lessons being learned, an extra tier of management committee is overlaid, tasked with overseeing the failing operation. This committee have lots of meetings, lots of discussions but do nothing. Then they finally make a decision, it goes wrong, wastes money, and instead of heads rolling and lessons being learned, an extra tier of management committee is overlaid, tasked with overseeing the failing operation....... ad infinitum. I met someone from exactly one of these oversight management overview appraisal management performance study committees not long ago. Total joker who (along with her team) did absolutely nothing at all of any benefit and could have been replaced with one person from a commercial background who is used to making decisions swiftly and standing by the consequences of those decisions.

    Hopefully this is what GF can bring in - a bit of get up & go........”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article