Jailed: Bristol pensioner who sexually abused three girls under 13
A Bristol pensioner convicted of sexually abusing three girls aged under 13 has been jailed for 12 years.
Former hotel porter Victor Dyer, 76, from Ashton, denied six charges of indecent assault against the first girl.
-

He also pleaded not guilty to three indecent assaults and seven indecent acts with the second girl, and three sexual assaults on the third.
Following a trial at Bristol Crown Court in January, he was unanimously acquitted of three indecent assaults on the first girl and three on the second girl.
But a jury of eight men and four women convicted him of all remaining counts by a majority of 10-2.
Judge Mark Horton told him: "In the trial it was plain that you were quite capable of extremely glib lies which you attempted to use in the course of the case.
"You have been an unseen danger to young girls. It is the duty of this court to send a message to girls who have been abused that they will be protected and society will protect them from people like you and punishment will need to be severe."
Dyer, who was banned from working with children for life, was given a lifelong sexual offences prevention order, banning him from unsupervised contact with children aged under 16.
He was also told to sign on the sexual offenders' register for life.
Before heading to the cells, Dyer blew a kiss to his gravely ill wife of 50 years Hilary, who sobbed in her wheelchair as she said goodbye to him.
Detective Constable John Roth, the police officer in charge of the case, told the Evening Post: "I hope the sentence of the judge today can help to give the victims closure from the years of abuse they've suffered. It sends out a message to people who are abusing young girls."
At his trial, the first complainant described how Dyer would put her on the floor of his bathroom, pull her and his own clothes off and rub his private parts against her groin.
The second girl said Dyer would remove his and her trousers and carry out a sexual act in front of her, got her to touch him intimately and touched her between her legs on top of her clothing.
The third girl told the court Dyer sexually assaulted her when she was in his kitchen, over the course of three months, and it "really hurt".
Dyer admitted an interest in aromatherapy oils, prompted by the care he gave his wife, who suffered from an infection of the lungs.
He said he used oil to treat the first girl for head lice and thrush, on the latter occasion applying it to her genital area – with her mother's consent – as his wife stopped her from wriggling.
He denied inappropriate behaviour with the girls, telling the court: "It could not have happened. We have a stringent rule; children would not go upstairs with an adult, unattended, for the treatment or administering of oils.
"It was an agreed rule which sometimes couples make to ensure they are protected from violation by children."
Dyer told the jury there was good reason for the imposition of the house rule.
He said: "It was to ensure this situation today does not happen; to protect the adult from whatever incrimination might be brought about by the lecherous thinking of some people."
One mother recalled to the witness box told the jury: "I had not heard that rule before."
She said she could not remember Dyer or his wife telling her anything like the rule.
Another mother recalled to court said she, too, was unaware of Dyer's house rule.
She could not remember a time when her daughter had thrush and said she did not consent to the child being treated with essential oils at Dyer's home.
She told the court: "I think if (the girl) had thrush I would have taken her to the doctor."
Edward Burgess, defending, said: "The prosecution ultimately triumphed. But there are no winners, only losers. The case is nothing short of a human tragedy, first and foremost for the three victims who were three young girls.
"They were very young, vulnerable, dependant and trusting."
Mr Burgess said his client had led an otherwise blameless life characterised by hard work and industry.
He said: "He has made valuable contributions to the community. He is spoken of in glowing terms by many who know him and still hold him dear."







34 Comments
View all
by South Gloucestershire Dan, South Glos.
Friday, March 12 2010, 9:44PM
“Filthy old man - I hope that he dies in prison and soon.”
by family member, Bristol
Friday, March 12 2010, 9:28PM
“It's funny how the naughty family members complain of one side of the story when they themselves weren't in court to hear the girls side of the story, and the fact that the judge and jury heard both sides of the story and could see straight through him that he was lying. I don't know how they live with themselves and the additional pain they have caused the victims.”
by Truth Hurts, Bristol
Thursday, March 11 2010, 8:55PM
“This is just 3 children brave enough to come forward. How many others has he interfered with that we dont know about? A N Other - maybe you need to re-look at the facts because you've obviously misinterpret it somewhere...unless of course there's an ulterior motive!”
by justice, bristol
Thursday, March 11 2010, 8:18PM
“A N Other would you be so protective if it was your child? I hardly think so.”
by sarah, ashton
Thursday, March 11 2010, 2:26PM
“To Family Member you deleted my last comments about more sinister motives for standing by a convicted child molestor yet you complain about your own comments being removed,The truth hurts I guess.Free Speech for all I say. I note his wife is gravely ill ,the Lord works in mysterious ways dont you think!!!!!! Love from all Ashton Vale residents xx xxx xxxx”
by Lee, Ashton
Thursday, March 11 2010, 11:39AM
“I was arrested and tried for an offence that I was totally innocent of.My barrister tore the prosecution witness to shreads because she was lieing and she was a fully grown,vindictive,spiteful adult.Any typpe of legal person could make mince meat out of children if the were lieing.His defence could not.Why? Because they were telling the truth.Let him rot in the deepest darkest whole that her majesty can find.Sex offenders get a very hard time in prison,what a shame x x x”
by family member, -
Thursday, March 11 2010, 11:23AM
“another deleted because I am telling the truth. Get it over with Evening post and just ban me!”
by Mike, ashton
Thursday, March 11 2010, 10:36AM
“I notice you sign "does it matter anymore" Not to normal,rational,sane people because he's where he belongs, What sort of house has a rule that no child is left alone with an adult? If the house is as you describe it with all parents present you wouldn't need this sort of rule.There is a proceedure in this country to appeal if you think there has been a miscarriage of justice.Im not sure what further evidence you need but Im thinking if you saw it all on video you would defend it as "medical treatment". Shame on you for not turning your back on this beast”
by red dave, ashton
Thursday, March 11 2010, 10:26AM
“Family members I look forward to hearing about your campaign to free this poor,frail,disabled pensinoner who has suffered this horrendous miscarriage of justice! cant wait to see how strong your beliefs really are.By the way my house is an identical lay out,I live very very nearby,and guess what? i have no difficulty lieing down in my bathroom and I'm 6" !!!. Good luck with your appeal ,cant wait,he could get more you know!”
by csf rob, Ashton
Thursday, March 11 2010, 10:13AM
“To the delude "family members",its not about believing all we read or listening to one side.Fact he admitted to treating a young girls genitals for thrush with oils!!!! Fact he made no comment when arrested,Fact a jury convicted him.Do you want me to draw you a picture?Sounds like he got away with it once,this time he got what he deserved.Horton is a highly respected and experienced judge /barrister, he would not have handed out 12 years if he thought there was any doubt.This man is a "glebe liar", sexual predator,perverted monster.If you stand by him then you must share the blame.”