Hero is injured stopping runaway van - and then is told 'it's your own fault'

Trusted article source icon
Monday, March 09, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

A brave man who cracked a rib stopping a Royal Mail van he saw rolling out of control down a hill has been told by the company that he shouldn't have bothered.

Robert Moore, 63, saw the unmanned red van rolling backwards down Whatley Road in Clifton into St John's Road as he walked home from shopping on a Saturday morning.

With children and elderly people nearby, he ignored his own safety and opened the door of the moving vehicle so he could apply the hand brake.

But in doing so he was knocked backwards, cracking his rib and grazing his knees.

Painter Mr Moore, a throat cancer survivor, managed to stop the van which had been heading for a parked car.

The father-of-two wrote to Royal Mail asking for compensation for the injuries he suffered as a result of the accident, but was given short shrift by the organisation.

Despite preventing damage being caused to a Royal Mail vehicle, Mr Moore was told his injuries were his own fault.

A letter from a Royal Mail claims negotiator to Mr Moore's solicitors Metcalfes of Queen Square said: "We cannot be held responsible for your client's injuries in choosing to stop a moving van without considering the personal consequences.

"We assume your client is of average intelligence and as such he must have known that what he was attempting to do was fraught with great danger, with the real possibility of personal injury.

"With that real threat apparent he should never have attempted to do what he did and while his actions may have been brave, they should not have been at the expense of his own safety.

"Had your client not attempted to stop the van it would have continued without posing any danger or threat to your client.

"That being the case, no injury could have been sustained.

"Of course it is commendable what your client did; however, Royal Mail would never ask a member of the public to risk their own safety in the manner above, and, while unfortunate, your client does appear to be the author of his own misfortune.

"We trust common sense will prevail here and you will simply advise in due course that your client's claim is withdrawn."

The letter also stated Mr Moore had attempted to stop the van "negligently", and said the Royal Mail was unable to confirm why the van had rolled.

Mr Moore, who lives in Whatley Road, believes it was because the hand brake had been left off by the driver.

He said: "I was coming home from Sainbury's in Clifton, and noticed the van going backwards without a driver.

"There were children and elderly people. I thought 'What do I do, let kids get killed?

"It wasn't going very fast but there was a parked car it would have hit.

"I opened the door but the motion made me fall over, which shoved my knees into my chest, cracked my rib and grazed my knees.

"The driver came down, he was a young guy, and said 'did I forget to put the hand brake on?' The chap said he was very sorry.

"I was in such agony. I went to the doctor as soon as I could get an appointment and he agreed I had a cracked rib, I'd had one before.

"I've still got scars on my knees to this day. I like to walk but it hurts.

"When I saw the letter I just laughed, I didn't believe it."

Mr Moore made the claim in early September, but didn't receive his rejection letter from the Royal Mail until the end of February.

Within hours of the Post contacting the Royal Mail for comment, the company had drastically changed its tune.

A spokesman said: "We would like to apologise to Mr Moore for the handling of this case and we are discussing the matter with him and his legal representatives."

42
Tweet this article
Report

42 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by KB, Bristol, England

    Tuesday, March 10 2009, 10:42AM

    “SB, Florida, what the most of us object to is the disgraceful attitude of suing for compensation for any incident, even when brought about by the individual.
    I have stated before, that had he done the deed and said no more, he may well have got a reward. But as he has chosen to go down the compensation route, he has quite rightly been thwarted.
    Compensation may well be a part of the American culture, but I would say that the most of us Brits consider it as a crass means of making money at the expense of common sense.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by SB, Florida

    Monday, March 09 2009, 7:47PM

    “Right.....so if you see a driverless Royal Mail van, maybe next time headed towards a child in a pram, best just to stand and watch, and then (worse case scenario) a child may lose it's life, the Royal Mail will be sued for millions for wrongful death, but you as a bystander will "be alright Jack"! Another shot in the arm for British justice”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Sam, Mexico City

    Monday, March 09 2009, 7:27PM

    “Dear Graeme; You seem not to understand that I only wrote of a "hypothetical" viz: "Would he say the same if.....?" Who on earth suggested it did happen?
    Let's just let the world turn, eh?
    (Just of interest, I used to live in St Whyte's Rd, Knowle, and in Clifton. Small world!)”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Graeme, Knowle

    Monday, March 09 2009, 7:12PM

    “Sam, Mexico - I back Pete on this one - although as I was the first poster to say he shouldn't get compensation then perhaps you should be attacking me and the many others saying the same thing.

    You twist the story around about saving a coach load of people - THAT DID NOT HAPPEN!!! Read the story and comment on the story. He tried to stop a van which wasn't his responsiblity from hitting a parked vehicle. No personal injuries involved except his own which he caused by his own actions.

    The only reason the RM have probably said they will look at this again is because the EP have got involved. I hope they look at it again and say no again.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Sam, Mexico City

    Monday, March 09 2009, 5:59PM

    “My, My; Is Pete one of those weirdos who just loves to impose his views upon the world? Running some sort of psychological profile from his
    numerous posts and ripostes, I
    (we) get the strange feeling he
    himself would not have waited a few weeks to claim.... Would he say the same if the situation had been, say, a coach driver who passed out at the wheel
    and our 'hero' stopped it and
    injured himself in the process? If not, where is the difference? Live your own life, Pete, there's a good fella; as you have read, there appear to be a few more
    compassionate people in RM
    who are looking into the matter again, back-pedalling from the original heartless lawyerese reply: Why, it even appears that Pete could actually have written that response, doesn't it, now?
    Let the world turn, Sir. And if he
    is ultimately rewarded, we here in Mexico reading the article on-
    line would greatly appreciate reading your retraction.
    Cheers. Sam, et al.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters