Funding cut hits payments for running speed cameras
COUNCILS in the Bristol area have slashed the amount of cash they are paying towards the operation of speed cameras following a cut in Government funding.
At least £82,000 has been cut from grants paid by councils in the former Avon area to the West of England Road Safety Partnership, which operates 37 fixed roadside cameras.
-

The partnership insists there is enough money available to operate the cameras until the end of March next year.
However, it has admitted the future of the cameras beyond next spring would be dictated by a Government spending review in October.
The Government has reduced the road safety grant handed out to local authorities as part of its pledge to "end the war on the motorist".
Earlier this week it emerged that every speed camera in Oxfordshire could disappear after its county council pledged to cut its funding to the Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership by £600,000 in a bid to meet £11 million savings.
Road safety campaigners fear other councils struggling to make ends meet could follow suit, resulting in lives being put at risk.
North Somerset Council has cut its funding for cameras by 27 per cent following a reduction in Government funding.
Currently it earmarks £120,000 a year towards camera provision, but this is to be reduced by £32,400 to £87,600.
North Somerset Council deputy leader and executive member for highways, Councillor Elfan Ap Rees, said: "Since 2007 we have been reducing our commitment to the cameras, and the latest funding announcement from Government means we will be reducing that further by 27 per cent.
"The cameras we have in North Somerset do perform an important safety function and are not there at all for revenue raising.
"What we have been doing up to now is switching funding into physical road improvements and supporting Speedchoice, which has shown success in teaching errant motorists how to drive safely."
South Gloucestershire Council has had to cut £50,000 from funding for cameras - from £194,842 to £144,842.
Cabinet councillor in charge of transport, Brian Allinson, said: "The council contributes funding to the West of England Road Safety Partnership, which in turn funds Safecam, which operates road safety cameras on our behalf.
"The funding announcement means there will be a reduction in the council contribution to Safecam.
"However, due to prudent management of resources, there should be no reduction in camera enforcement.
"The council is committed to road safety and the cameras are just one element of a wider strategy. Education, training and road engineering all contribute to making South Gloucestershire's roads among the safest in the country."
A spokeswoman for Bristol City Council said the authority had not yet established whether it would be reducing the amount it paid to the road safety partnership. Bath and North East Somerset Council was also unable to supply details of its plans.
Dick Bowen, manager of the road safety partnership, said: "I can say categorically that we are fiscally sound until March 31 next year, so we won't be turning any cameras off between now and then.
"Our concern is what will happen in the autumn with the Government review."
Road safety minister Mike Penning said: "Local authorities have relied too heavily on safety cameras for far too long, so I am pleased some councils are focusing on other measures to reduce road casualties."
Ellen Booth, a campaigns officer for road safety group Brake, said: "It would be a disaster if these cuts were passed on in full by county councils to road safety partnerships.
"It would be especially hard to justify the idea that all speed cameras should be turned off. Speed cameras are a really cost-effective way of managing speed, which is one of the biggest issues on our roads."











28 Comments
View all
by Michael Knight, Bristol
Friday, July 30 2010, 8:30AM
“"You cannot arbitrarily choose which laws to obey and then feel aggrieved when you bluff is called and you're fined.
Pogo the Clown"
Oh really? I seem to recall you arguing for exactly that when it came to cyclists jumping red lights or cycling on the pavement. The clown does have a short memory methinks.”
by Prince Tobius, The Great Out There
Thursday, July 29 2010, 6:03PM
“Yes, Roger I agree & I'm glad someone picked else picked up on that. Pogo does seem to have some serious issues in the upstairs department - so to speak. He definitely isn't your usual sort of fun irreverent clown is he. More like Judge Dredd on a bouncy stick I'd have thought.”
by Pragmatist, Bristol
Thursday, July 29 2010, 5:07PM
“"I personally think there should be a speed camera outside each school and hospital in England"
Why hospital and not a park?”
by Pogo the Clown, .
Thursday, July 29 2010, 3:29PM
“Fair enough, Paul. I think we're talking about separate issues.”
by Paul, Bristol
Thursday, July 29 2010, 3:13PM
“Pogo, I'm not even going to try and persuade you that if you commit a crime and a minor one at that. you should be let off. That is simply absurd.
What I think people are trying to say is that for years and years people have been saying that cameras are there simply as a revenue making scheme. They don't contribute towards helping reduce the number of accidents as claimed and are often placed in areas to purposely catch out motorists. Recent reports seem to suggest that their effectiveness in helping reduce accidents has been misreported to help keep them in place, thus keeping extra revenue coming in.
I personally think there should be a speed camera outside each school and hospital in England. Also accident black spots where there has been a continual increase in the number of accidents year on year, not just a recent increase in the past 2 weeks due to bad weather etc....
But what we have tend to found is speed camera springing up left right and centre because of a recent increase in accidents, cameras are then introduced, accident rate fails back to normal, cameras and left in place and then success is attributed to the cameras when the accident rate would have reduced to normal on its own. Have a look at http://www.safespeed.org.uk/rttm.html Please try and read it with an open mind, I know it¿s from an organisation who wish to remove all speed cameras but it really does explain the process very well.”