Feedback: Bristol City's plans for a new stadium
First Hargreaves kicks off about having to pay taxes on his excessive earnings.
Now it’s Lansdown’s turn to hold a gun to the council’s head to get his own way over the new stadium.
If he’s that keen, he could build it in his back garden and pay for it. Don’t expect the residents to agree to Tesco building another supermarket we don’t need
The council should follow the correct procedures and take as long as it takes.
His talk of 1,000 jobs is pie in the sky. Most would only be short term, the same as building houses.
Perhaps the residents of Ashton/Bedminster should set up a residents’ group to oppose everything in the same way as the people of Horfield.
A disgruntled hardworking
local resident.
WITH regard to the eventual sale of the old Ashton Gate ground, I was under the impression there was a shortage of affordable housing in south Bristol; hence the threatened march into the green belt.
I hope Bristol City Council weighs up the priorities when the time comes to sanction the ground’s change of use. A further supermarket would add considerable traffic to the Cumberland Basin and Ashton Gate road network, and with other supermarkets already in close proximity, the local shops in Ashton would undoubtedly suffer.
If Mr Lansdown had any conscience, he would sell the old ground for housing and fund the difference. He could then call it the “Lansdown Arena”.
Ken Simmons,
THE over-development of commercial premises has caused the traffic problems in the Winter- stoke Road area.
Tesco superstore on the Bristol City Soccer Club site would add to the traffic troubles and, of course, affect the traders and residents of the area.
The Ashton Gate site should be used for housing, but I can understand City owner Steve Lansdown wanting to sell to the highest bidder, as the new home for the football will not come cheap.
Sadly for the local residents and traders, Bristol City Council does not have a good track record when faced with making tricky decisions.
The lunatic decision to allow the redevelopment of the Memorial Ground does not inspire me to believe it will not allow a Tesco store at ‘The Gate’.
If anyone thinks a Tesco store adds to the community, they can have a look at nearby Nailsea where many shops have closed, thanks to Tory-controlled North Somerset Council welcoming Tesco.
Dennis Franklin,
North Somerset.
NOW we have a council with overall control, perhaps we can move forward with the proposed new stadium and, as the council leader says, promote Bristol onto the European and world stage.
I understand some people have fears of the effect a new store will have on North Street, but in my opinion, that area is very strong in its diversity and would continue to flourish. Indeed I envisage a lot of trade coming from the A4 Portway area, which is poorly served for supermarkets and could possibly bring new customers to the area. I note some people from the Long Ashton area are concerned about the possible impact on their village of the new stadium.
Other than the view of the stadium on the horizon over the bypass I fail to see how the impact can be any different than at present. Even with the possible increase to 42,000 for World Cup matches.
This figure still doesn’t reach the previous capacity of the existing ground. And I can’t see people diverting through Long Ashton anymore than they have in the past to attend football matches.
This facility will be great for supporters of sport in general, not just Bristol City, and will give a major boost to south Bristol which for too long has been overlooked in favour of the north side when it comes to investment in property and people. Let’s get it built.
Richard Lane,
address supplied.
I SUSPECT the letter from Mr T Clements is in line for a few responses for his comments “council money talks”.
You only had to read the first paragraph to have an inkling that Mr Clements was on the blue side of town. As a proud Bristolian, I hope he is right when he says the proposed new Ashton Gate stadium is a done deal because it will benefit everyone in the area and not just City fans. It is time the council came up with the goods as we, the general public, have been let down so often in the past.
Yes, a new stadium will generate money, but money for Bristol. Yes a new stadium will be good for the football club, but also for other people wanting more entertainment and better facilities to enjoy their concerts etc. As for the comments regarding attendance, Bristol City can fill their current ground when things are going well (like Rovers). You only have to look at small town clubs like Reading and Wigan (who used to have gates of 3-4,000) who have benefited from new stadiums.
With a city the size of Bristol, the boys in red are far better equipped to succeed than many others. Good on you, Mr Lansdown. Keep dreaming for all Bristolians, including those who suffer from tunnel vision.
Mike Felton,
Bristol.











6 Comments
View all
by Chris, Bristol
Saturday, July 04 2009, 7:30AM
“Ne expense spent on design then! The stadium looks like a B&Q warehouse. where is the tower, the dome, the arch. the ambition?”
by david, Planet Earth
Tuesday, June 16 2009, 3:29PM
“Hello Minnie, still moaning then. The new stadium will happen and so will the new Tesco store, maybe peoples energy would be better spent on trying to get as good a deal as possible out of BCFC and Tescos for the area and it's residents ?
We had a Tescos store built near us, but it came with a new leisure center to shut up residents which is well utilised by me - I don't use the store by the way, I dislike Tesco's and the way it bulldozes council planning. Now that's irony for you.”
by Minnie, Bristol
Tuesday, June 16 2009, 12:33PM
“David,
Ever heard of IRONY?
The point I was making (as I obviously need to spell it out) is that people who are DIRECTLY affected by living near to one of these developments are not necessarily whingers or moaners, but actually trying to safeguard their quality of life against massive increases in traffic, pollution, parking problems, vandalism etc., and that people who live FAR AWAY either don't care whether it goes ahead or not, or spout platitudes about progress. Now do you get the point? Yes, it IS hypocrisy. We are ALL hypocrites in such situations. That's the point Im labouring!!!!!!”
by david, Planet Earth
Tuesday, June 16 2009, 8:15AM
“Minnie - You certainly live up to your name. On one hand you criticise me for commenting on a development where I supposedly live nowhere near, and on the other you say you don't object to the Ashton Gate development because you don't live there ! Hypocrite or what ?
As to the stadium needing to be out of town, well I agree and that is exactly where it's going to be with the transport and parking to go with it.
Like I said in my first post, there appears to be a vocal minority who object on grounds which is nothing other than moaning.”
by Moaning Minnie, Bristol
Monday, June 15 2009, 3:21PM
“David of Planet Earth, Do you live anywhere near any of the proposed developments people are having doubts over? Chances are 'No'. I do not choose to follow football, but I do not expect football fans to either pay in their quality of life or in real hard cash for MY chosen pursuits.Football stadia these days, with most people travelling by car, should be OUT OF TOWN and have ample access and parking. Due to the behaviour of a minority, whose impact is disproportinately huge on local people, they should also be sited away from residential areas. It is easy to cry 'Nimby' and 'moaner' if your daily life is not blighted by an ill-conceived and badly sited so-called 'development'. I have no problem with the Ashton Gate development, incidentally. Why? because I live a long way away, but I DO have problems with other plans this City Council has passed. Why? Because they affect me, my family, my freedom to come and go around my own area, and because people have NO RIGHT OF APPEAL against planning decisions. Unbelievable but true. Check it out.”