Farooq Siddique: A Muslim in Bristol
Last Thursday, the Evening Post reported the visit to Bristol of Shahid Malik, minister for communities and local government, who praised Bristol's Muslim community for informing the police about would-be suicide bomber Andrew Ibrahim.
Mr Malik said: "The fact that it was the Muslim community that came forward with information is something that Muslims globally can take great heart from.
"What happened here shows clearly that Muslims are the same as everybody else, they respect the same laws and they are valued members of the community."
The people that reported Ibrahim to the security services have shunned any media attention or publicity about their role in potentially saving many lives, saying only that they were only doing what anyone else would have done, and that it was simply their Islamic duty.
The Minister's words will nevertheless be reassuring to many within the Muslim communities.
Too often now, the Muslim communities are viewed with suspicion, fear, and hate.
"Islamophobia" is a term coined especially to give recognition to this new phenomenon; an irrational fear of Islam and Muslims. But groups like the English Defence League are hell bent on turning an obvious lack of understanding of Islam, an irrational fear, into something far more sinister and devastating: the hatred of Muslims.
I completely understand why genuine ordinary people would suffer from symptoms of Islamophobia.
Before 9/11, the general knowledge of the Muslim communities among wider society was certainly limited. In those, now good old days, the Muslim communities were seen as law-abiding, peaceful and hard-working, they kept themselves to themselves. There were movies, the Arabian Nights, Aladdin and Sinbad. I cheered Sylvester Stallone in Rambo 3, fighting alongside the Afghan "Mujahedeen" as they sought to rid their country of those pesky Russians! I even remember when former US President Ronald Reagan dedicated the launch of the Space Shuttle to the "freedom struggle of the Mujahedeen of Afghanistan". How times change!
After 9/11, virtually overnight, the Muslim communities became viewed as a threat, the state within, the fifth column, terrorist sympathisers and conspiring to take over the world.
In the absence of any knowledge, ignorance prevailed.
Today, many within the Muslim communities are still getting used to the new ground reality. The fall from grace has not been easy. That a mere 19 deluded hijackers could have such a catastrophic impact on world events and on the perception of Muslims all over the world is difficult to fathom. Subsequent actions and counter actions around the world have served to only further add to that sense of misunderstanding, that sense of fear.
If you read some of the feedback I get to my column on this website every week, the scale of misunderstanding becomes clear.
In reply to one of the questions I get almost every week, I say loudly, clearly and honestly: "No! Muslims do not want to take over the country!"
I, like most people in this country, want to live in peace. As a Muslim, I am free to practise my religion in this country without risk of persecution or oppression. It is a freedom that everyone else enjoys in this country, too. It's a part of what makes Britain so great.
I have no doubt that a tiny minority of Muslims around the UK (and the world) are doing and saying terrible things, often against other Muslims. But they do so despite being Muslim, not because they are Muslim.
"Islamophobia" can only be overcome by joint knowledge. In that, every Muslim must now try and play a part. It's time to step forward and be an ambassador for your community.











83 Comments
View all
by Jonathan, Canada
Wednesday, October 21 2009, 5:05AM
“Mike, i can only quote Farooq thus:
'In the absence of any knowledge, ignorance prevailed.'”
by Mike, Bristol
Saturday, October 17 2009, 1:07PM
“"Inhuman", "spoilt child", here we go again, see what I mean that's all they can do is throw insults and threats, let Grifthin and everyone have their voice if they are so inhuman Jonathan Canada then no one will listen to them and they will hang themselves with their own words, you lot are all the same as stated in my comments earler you have proved this now beyond doubt, people of Britain make up your own minds and don't listen to the insults and threats of the left wing thugs.”
by Martin, Knowle, bristol
Saturday, October 17 2009, 1:04PM
“Wow just read the top of your post Jonathan. I thought I was debating with a rational being but no. You think a religious explanation is sensible. Didn't bother to read anymore. Off now.”
by Martin, Knowle Bristol
Saturday, October 17 2009, 12:59PM
“Jonathan. Thanks for the reply. Its afternoon here and my belief in sport is beckoning so I will be quick or I may be punished with a fine for being late.
You do seem fixated with the word belief. The cat in the box. Is of course phsycobabble. Why believe in anything until you see the evidence?
We can of course make up our own minds. Assuming of course that we are allowed to question and have evidence and have the relevant skills.
Children don't have these things. neither do many adults.
Don't fall into the same thinking as many religionists. The idea may be stupid but I didn't say that makes the people that accept the idea ( don't like the word belief much) as necessarily stupid.
Face it, without the pshycobabble, there are no gods/fairies is a logical statement as there is ,as you say, no evidence. There are gods/fairies is not logical as there is, as you say, no evidence.
Im'e off for know. Life to live.”
by Jonathan, Canada
Saturday, October 17 2009, 12:53PM
“Martin, having thought some more, i'm not sure that your use of the word 'daft' is particularly useful. You don't agree with the beliefs, but that does not make them daft.
As i have said before, there is no proof either way. You believe the scientific explanation because the explanation makes more sense to you. Others find the religious explanation more sensible.
You may want to realise that man cannot and will not ever understand everything. There are always things that cannot be proven. Why try to understand the unprovable?
I realise that you will probably think that i am advocating the 'why bother' attitude, but far from it. If you can think of a way of proving that a supreme being does not exist, i think everyone would listen. Man has never devised a way of proving that one way or the other, so i doubt you will be any different.
As previously stated, your insistance that a god does not exist is still an attempt at indoctrination. You say that you ant people to question everything. I am sure that every religious person in the world has considered that a god may not exist and that everything may be down to science. After this, people still choose to follow a religion. And why not?
In summary, you cannot preach that atheism is the way. You stating that it is, is the same as you are accusing organised relgions of.
Mike, maybe it's time to make your own mind up, rather than blindly folllow the BNP. If you had researched them properly, you would find that they are not the answer.
If you do believe that they are the pparty to follow, then you are inhuman. Your comments in support of them remind me of a spoilt child. 'yeah, but they did this first' is not the way to justify your political leanings.”