Farooq Siddique: Moral compass points the way
Last week, I talked about the techniques used by the CIA to obtain information from alleged terrorists.
My view was that some of those techniques, for what I thought obvious reasons, were unacceptable, and not part of the values we hold dear in the West; values which are worth fighting for.
But the barrage of comments my column received on this website, all of them critical, was depressing.
The comments collectively, amounted to a robust support of the CIA techniques; "Get the Taliban to publish their techniques" said one. "We must do what ever it takes" said another, regardless of what "whatever it takes" would mean.
One American contributor commented "the author refers to an 'alleged al-Qaeda prisoner' who was water boarded 183 times. There is nothing 'alleged' about Khalid Sheik Mohammed.
This man was …the principal al-Qaeda authority behind the 9/11 attacks".
But that is the point my friend; none of these people have been charged, or tried or even told of why they are being held.
They have just been repeatedly tortured or subject to "harsh interrogations". After being water boarded 183 times, you'll "sing like a canary" for sure, heck you'd even win the X-Factor final if your captors asked you to!
There were the usual none-too-bright comments barely veiling the rabid anti-religionist views; one idea was to carpet bomb Afghanistan for example, but one of the more poignant comments was "I wouldn't wish any of these practices to be visited on anyone for any reason...until the London bombings".
And herein lies the danger. With so much senseless killing on both sides – at the weekend for example, NATO bombed a hijacked oil tanker in Afghanistan, burning alive 90 civilians – the emotion of revenge is powerful, enticing.
We are living in the realm of "kill them before they kill us"; the emotion of fear and hate is overwhelming. It applies to people on both sides of the divide. When "revenge" is the pervading ideology, our moral compass is threatened with perversion.
Just as I defy and condemn Muslims who carry out atrocities against civilians, who are equally blinded by the emotion of revenge and hate, so I will also stand and condemn those wanting to rule by the law of the jungle.
If "they" (the other) hates the West for "hypocrisy", our "double standards", why in the West can we not stand by our true values, and show them to be true; the values of justice, of freedom, of equality under the law for all.
Why do we become the monster that the "other" so fears and so hates?
We say "we will not let the terrorists win", they "will not change our way of life", but when we say "let's kill them all", simply because we can, have we not already lost?
Islam did not give birth to the evil carried out by some Muslims. As Hussein Shobokshi of a leading Arabic daily says: "This is a miserable scene that has no connection whatsoever to the glorious history of Islam, which was able to produce scientific breakthroughs and export these advances to the wider world. The Muslim world was one that conducted dialogue and coexisted with others. Its figures, such as al-Ghazali, Ibn Khaldun, Averroes, Avicenna, al-Kindi, and Alhazen, towered over their contemporaries. Their ideas have served humanity and formed the basis of knowledge in areas such as medicine, astronomy, mathematics, algebra, geometry, architecture, and sociology."
The West today is no different. Let us, together, stand by those values, and show them to be true.











17 Comments
View all
by gertbigwheels, south bristol
Wednesday, September 16 2009, 6:45PM
“Our fairness is seen as a weakness.If we didn't fight fair we could carpet bomb the lot of them.And intern anyone who we don't trust here.So i think people who don't like us should go away.”
by alex, mangotsfield
Wednesday, September 16 2009, 7:05AM
“It always seems to be the same defensive storythe same hackneyed excuses are trotted out EVERY time "we were tortured " is always the cry.You can bet that at this moment some where, a terrorist is plotting mass destruction & when this "as yet unknown" person is caught, his storyline will be ," I was tortured"”
by woe britannia, south bristol
Tuesday, September 15 2009, 6:14PM
“when my grandparents were alive they would often say that the foreigners would rule the roost.I wonder what they would make of it now.Perhaps it is a perception.But some people seem to be more problematic than others.The EU will destroy European culture by trying to homogenize us all.Labour's version of multiculturalism is not wanted by most British and Ethnic people.It will not work.It will only cause ghettos and despair.There will always be a dominating force, may it be ethnic or mixed.Take a look at the USA or closer still places like Bradford.Depressing.People like Farooq will have a louder voice and the British people will have no say.Already our local Council has a bias against our Native people.We should be proud to be British not ashamed.When i see kids talking in Jamaican English.I think why?We have a great Language already.They should know it is cool to be a Brit.”
by Daniel, Clifton
Monday, September 14 2009, 9:58PM
“@Rory.
Not sure regarding the others, but for Hitler's war, the quote that does spring to mind from "Mein Kamph" is as follows:
"...I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work."
Other than that, Graham P and Martin appear to know their onions as far as I can tell and frankly, I couldn't have put into words anything more eloquent given the subject.”
by Martin, Knowle,Bristol.
Monday, September 14 2009, 3:06PM
“I don't understand what you mean by faith neutral, Rory.To say these two world wars didn't involve religion is a bit simplistic I think. I am not sure if the Nazi dictatorships reasons for the final solution were faith neutral. Or the then Popes attitude to the Third Reich was atheistic. Pretty obvious he viewed communism as the enemy(faithless) and wanted Britain to side with the Axis powers(catholic). Same applies to the thinking of the pope in the first world war. More concerned with religious power than anything else. Power.
Dictatorships are the problem yes?. The ultimate religIon. Once religions, and dictatorships become tolerant they slowly dissolve and disappear into insignifacance, or splinter up into more aggressive fragments and start again. The continuing cycle. I think its time to be honest about all this and put religions, all religions, in their place. In the history lesson at school, and left there.”