Fans' worry for Bristol Rovers

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Bristol Rovers fans say they are frustrated by the lack of progress on the club's plans to redevelop the Memorial Stadium.

Planning permission to transform the Mem into a 18,500-seater stadium as part of a £35 million project was agreed almost three years ago.

But work is yet to start and Rovers' chairman Nick Higgs yesterday admitted progress was still "painfully slow", although he insisted work to secure funding for the stadium in Horfield was continuing behind the scenes.

Supporters are being asked to remain patient but some Gasheads say it is difficult to accept the lack of progress when an air of excitement surrounds Bristol City's plans for a new stadium at Ashton Vale and the associated 2018 World Cup bid.

Gary Marks, chairman of Gas Independent Fans' Trust (Gift), said he was worried the gulf between City and Rovers could grow if a new stadium is built at Ashton Vale and the Memorial Stadium remains undeveloped. He said football in Bristol could mirror that of Stoke-on-Trent, where Port Vale struggles while Stoke City has received investment for a new stadium and established itself in the Premier League.

Mr Marks said: "My worry is that we will increasingly become the poor relations of Bristol City. Rovers need to put an end to the rumour mill because there have been a lot of Chinese whispers among supporters.

"The club has nothing to fear by being more open with everyone about what is happening – we all want this to succeed and are desperate for it to go ahead.

"People are looking across the river and that's accelerating the sense of urgency amongst fans. We don't want to be the Port Vale to Bristol City's Stoke."

Jim Chappell, chairman of Bristol Rovers Supporters' Club, said he too was frustrated.

He said: "Everyone is frustrated by the amount of work they are having to do behind the scenes.

"But from the position we were in 10 years ago, we own our own ground and are positive the new stadium will be developed. We have to believe what the directors are saying.

"With City getting planning permission for their new stadium it does make it worse."

In October 2008, Rovers announced they were planning to stay at the Memorial Stadium during the redevelopment instead of moving to Cheltenham Town's ground for home matches.

Planning permission was granted for the new ground in January 2007 and the plans have since been revised.

The club hope the stadium will be built complete with a hotel and student accommodation, which will help fund the project.

Developer Opal Property Group pulled out of a deal to build and manage the student accommodation attached to the stadium in summer 2008.

The club had hoped to start work this summer and it was expected the redevelopment would take two years and be complete by the start of the 2011-12 season.

The club has refused to confirm whether it is still aiming to play matches at the new stadium for the beginning of the 2011-12 season.

Mr Higgs said: "There has been a lot of talk recently about the lack of any fresh information regarding the stadium regeneration project.

"While I understand your frustration – no one is more frustrated than me – we are subject to a number of confidentiality agreements with our various partners, and do not want to jeopardise proceedings by releasing information at the wrong time.

"I do not want to be forced into saying something that I later regret, but I can assure you that there is still a lot of work going on behind the scenes and things are moving in the right direction, but we realise that progress is painfully slow."

4
Tweet this article
Report

4 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Eastville Ernie, Brislington

    Monday, November 23 2009, 11:01AM

    “All GIFT seem to do is moan about Rovers. They don't speak for the average fan. If they were genuine Gasheads they would join the Supporters Club which is very pro-active in raising thousands of pounds for the football club,
    if it raised as much money as the Supporters Club then perhaps these people wouldn't moan about the club being short of cash.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by gerry, bristol

    Saturday, November 21 2009, 5:38PM

    “Sell the ground to Tesco's, sorted.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Laughing Gas, Bristol

    Saturday, November 21 2009, 12:48PM

    “Horfield Boy has forgotten that the EP were VERY enthusiastic about the redevelopment of the Mem, when Kirsty Pugh (now working for Rovers) was one of their reporters. However, in the absence of ANY progress, and bluff and waffle coming from the board, they have decided its a no-go, as have many of the fans. It was always unrealistic, being in totally the wrong kind of location. Rovers are also deep in debt, so no-one is likely to want to invest in them when there is a more viable project in the City stadium. They should come clean, give it up and spend the money on players . If the Rovers had more success, they money would follwo, and they could sell the Mem, move out and build a brand new stadium away from a residential area. Only a dream.......”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Horfield Boy, Horfield

    Saturday, November 21 2009, 9:22AM

    “So Gary Marks and GIFT (with their 50 members) represent the views of all the Gas fans do they? Jim Chappell of BRSC puts it better and mirrors what Nick Higgs stated - there are delays, we are frustrated, but on balance the new stadium will get built. And all this rubbish about being poor relations of Bristol City - what's new - we have been for about 40 years but currently only because City are funded by Steve Lansdown i.e. it's pure luck currently - SL has more to spend on his loss-making club than Rovers directors can afford!

    Never mind, your paper can continue to publicise Ashton Vale at every opportunity whilst being negative towards Rovers - again, nothing new in that!”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters