Engineer fell 16ft down Bristol motorway embankment

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

A Bristol motorway engineer working to replace a roadside CCTV camera died after he fell 16ft off the edge of the M5 and down an embankment, an inquest heard.

Cecil Grant, 42, from Southmead, died 10 days after plummeting off the edge of the hard shoulder down a steep drop as he worked in darkness on Tickenham Hill in January 2006.

The inquest at Flax Bourton heard that Mr Grant's bosses at subcontractor Serco had not warned him he would be working near an embankment so he didn't bring a safety harness.

And the jury was told the motorway was not properly lit for the work and Mr Grant was equipped only with a torch he had bought himself from a DIY shop for £10.

Mr Grant's colleague Peter Wilson, who was working with the father-of-two to replace the faulty camera, said he would never have volunteered to carry out the job if had he known about the risks.

He told the jury yesterday that he heard Mr Grant shout out before he "vanished" off the edge of the road on a split level section of the motorway northbound between junctions 19 and 20, for Portishead and Clevedon respectively.

Coroner Brian Whitehouse heard Mr Grant underwent surgery for a back injury he sustained in the fall and later died at Frenchay Hospital from a blood clot which developed because he had become immobile for several days.

Mr Wilson said: "There was a lot of shrubbery around and I didn't know there was a huge drop just inches away from me. I looked up and Cecil had vanished and I started to look for him. Then I saw his torch shining up from below.

"If I had known it was such a dangerous location, I wouldn't have gone to do the job."

The inquest heard that a warning sign was installed near the camera following the accident and a Highways Agency inspection recommended a guardrail be installed along the edge of the road.

Firefighter and paramedic Eric Pimm, who was lowered down to help Mr Grant after the fall, said he was aware of two other occasions when people had dropped over the edge of the motorway in the same area in the last eight years.

Paul Mitchell, head of health and safety at the Highways Agency, said the existing crash barrier, which was fixed a few feet from the drop, was effective in preventing people nearing the edge of the road and installing a further guardrail was not necessary.

Detective Inspector Ben Batley told the inquest the Crown Prosecution Service had considered charges of involuntary manslaughter against three employees of Serco but they were not pursued.

He said the investigation had since been passed to the Health and Safety Executive, which was yet to conclude its inquiry into the fall.

David Leckie, representing Serco, told the inquest his client had not been made aware of the steep embankment by the Highways Agency and other main contractors. The inquest continues.

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by RL, Bristol

    Friday, November 06 2009, 4:02PM

    “Anon, Had you understood the accident you would understand that this incident happen at night in the dark, Thus Mr Grant was not able to see the drop. Just bare in mind that the only guard is the crash barrier, Remember this the next time you break down on a motorway, before you step over the crash barrier to a safe location, as advised by the highway agency.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by ck, bristol

    Tuesday, November 03 2009, 8:56PM

    “Anon, Mr Grant didn't need safety equipment he was working on the hard shoulder, and thought he was in a safe place. he has been failed by the company due to procedures not being carried out correctly, the site Mr grant attended, was surveyed from inside a car by the company surveyor, because it was to unsafe for them to get out of the car due to the location of this incident, the camera was put on the edge of a vertical drop, on the other side of the crash barrier, which should have been checked properly before the camera was erected and after, this didn¿t happen, Mr Grant didn't have a chance, and was not made aware of the dangers of this place of work
    He should have never died”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Alex, Redcliffe

    Tuesday, November 03 2009, 11:56AM

    “Can anyone explain why this keeps getting removed (if it's up long enough for you to read it!)?I will keep posting this comment all day as I believe it is relevant to the above story. It is also a matter of principle now as you have deleted it five times! I will not accept censorship for no good reason. Either keep the comment or close this story to comments altogether! Also, please email me to explain your actions as I consider them to be totally unacceptable. So...

    Looks like Serco could be facing a massive payout to the family of Mr Grant. Surely in the health & safety culture we currently live, it is highly unusual for things like this to happen. I am usually one of the first to complain about stupid things like banning hanging baskets etc but if Serco had done a risk assessment and taken their responsibility as an employer seriously then this might not have happened. It is also down to employees to refuse to do work where they feel they are not properly protected (although in this case Mr Grant¿s colleague said they could not tell how big the drop was). It is unfortunate that it takes the death of someone to ensure safety measures are implemented properly in the future.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by anon, bristol

    Tuesday, November 03 2009, 10:46AM

    “im sorry for the loss of this mans life, but come on you know when a job is safe or not and you should always carry safety equipment”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Alex, Redcliffe

    Tuesday, November 03 2009, 10:37AM

    “Didn't mean to post the same paragraph twice by the way.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters