Development may cover up Banksy mural
A world-famous Banksy mural in the heart of Bristol could be partially hidden from view in a new housing development, it has been claimed.
The 10-year-old work, Mild Mild West, on the side of a former solicitor's office in Stokes Croft, shows a Teddy bear aiming a Molotov cocktail at riot police.
It has become an icon of street art, well-known to the mysterious graffiti artist's fans all over the world.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013
But now architect Nick Childs, chairman of the Bristol Urban Design Forum, believes plans to develop the area immediately in front of the mural could rob the public of one of modern Bristol's more popular sights.
Developers Connolly and Callaghan, of nearby Hamilton House, want to build nearly 80 homes – mostly flats – on land fronting on to Stokes Croft on one side and City Road on the other.
Offices, a cafe and a shop are also included in the project, which is being recommended for approval at tomorrow's development control committee meeting of the city council.
But it is the scheme for a so-called 'Winter Garden' – a glassed open area – at the Stokes Croft front of the project which is controversial.
If it gets the go-ahead, the Banksy mural – which has taken the brunt of Bristol's weather since it was created in early 1999 – will be brought under cover for the first time.
Customers at the proposed cafe will be able to marvel at it as they sit at tables laid out in the Winter Garden.
And White Design, agents for the developers, insist the public will not only be able to walk in and out of the glassed area to enjoy one of the earliest surviving examples of Banksy's work. They will also be able to see it through the glass from outside, they say.
But the Urban Design Forum – a panel of architects and conservationists regularly, as on this occasion, consulted by the council's planning officials – is not so sure.
"The Winter Garden may or may not be accessible," Mr Childs told the Bristol Evening Post.
"Either way it will obscure the Banksy. It will mean it is no longer part of the public realm, which is the whole point of it.
"Banksy works in public spaces. The idea of enclosing it privatises it. It will be a huge loss to the public, particularly the community of Stokes Croft."
But project architect Matt Harrison, of White Design, in Sevier Street, St Werburgh's, said: "Members of the public will be able to walk in and out. It will be an internal public space.
"People visiting the cafe will sit next to the Banksy and it will be possible to see it from outside.
"We have worked very hard with the council and other groups to build what people want to see on this site."
The present Finance House office building, which is empty, is in front of the Hamilton House site. Both will be redeveloped in the scheme.
Mr Childs believes the pressure to build up to the line of other properties in Stokes Croft came from the city council planners.
Mr Harrison said: "There was a desire from the council to build up to the line. We have tried to create a vibrant solution that can be used throughout the year. It's not just a dead space in front of flats."
Mr Harrison acknowledged the Banksy was "an important part of Bristol's current culture" which "must be respected".
What Banksy himself will make of this debate, we are unlikely to discover. The artist – whose work now earns millions – keeps his identity closely guarded.






Comments
by Daniel, Colorado (US) (born Bristol)
Saturday, December 27 2008, 2:06PM
“I would like to make a few points about Banksy's work and his art.
It is irrelevant what he can afford. How many people visit the art museums and look at politically interesting works and then think about them and not move on? A few.
How many people will drive past a rat with a sign on the side of an over pass, or will walk by a wall with a bear and some riot police? Thousands.
Art is not something that can be done anywhere and still be the same art. By painting a wall instead of a canvas, he has created a totally different, and more powerful work of art.
As to this being "Hyped up vandalism" no. Just no. Do you clean Einstein's desk because it isn't clean and neat? No. Do you clean the wal of french caves and destroy our history? No. Do you burn an old scroll full of outdated ideas? No. Do you destroy Hadrian's wall because it isn't useful? No.
Do you destroy a message because it wasn't made in the most correct manner? No.
It is threw a arrow mind that one sees this work, or any other of its kind, as "vandalism". So maybe the wall is no longer the burgundy red of its bricks, but it was hardly much better being that red than the art it is now.
As for class divitions? Churchill wasn't exactly working class, was he? Or Martin Luther King Jr., Whom I under stand wasn't too badly off. Boudica was a queen, as was Elizabeth. Victoria I understand came, too, from a good family. Sun Tzu knew the emperor I hear. Leonidas and Dienekes weren't poor. Leonardo Da Vinci grew up in a good house. Numerous revolutionaries, to many to name, who fought for the weak and neglected, were from upper classes. I think I aught now point out that I'm a middle-class student right now fluent in two languages and learning a third, with a classical education. As such I surely can't know about what I'm talking about.
As for false gods? People don't seek false gods, they seek people who get it. and What you claim to be "represented" (by the manner of your writing) is in fact represented by the highest classes, and companies who use the working, middle and even lower rungs of the upper class as fuel for their "machines".
Fredrick douglas once said that "If there is no struggle there is no progress"
Subcomandante Marcos once said "Ideas are weapons"
A World War Two combatant once said "Blood is the strongest paint, the wall the strongest canvas. Everyone sees a wall, and so everyone sees the suffering."
Oh, and Banksy doesn't "sell his wares of millions" but an order of magnitude less. And it is not defacement. Defacement implies destruction. And he isn't a self proclaimed hero, merely a man wishing to say what he wants to say, and to be heard saying it. Because the public has adopted him, he is a hero.
"Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison."
So what if it is a criminal act? I can see no way in which it harms the owners of the location. In fact, with Banksy's reputation, his art on a building's wall improves things such as business in the area. He helps the city in the long run by breaking a small insignificant law. And before you say "Oh well, if you can pick and choose which laws to follow" stop. One could argue that, if the police, who are the physical manifestation of the law, do not take the time to prevent the crime then it evidently isn't a crime. It is not the choosing of which laws to follow by the people, but the choosing of which laws to enforce. If artist were caught and punished enough, graffiti would be like murder is, an obvious taboo act that isn't to be done. Inaction shapes society as much as action does. By not preventing the crime, they encourage it. And if banksy is caught, I say let him be punished for his crimes, but it isn't his fault that he hasn't been caught.
Now, more specific replies:
John, of the fish ponds, you'll find that several formula 1 drivers have been let off of reckless endangerment charges (As I believe it”
by Stan Fermunder, Central Bristol
Wednesday, December 10 2008, 5:53PM
“Only in your drug-addled mind.....”
by Alex, Bristol
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 10:45PM
“Sad Stan - Rattled, again!”
by Stan Fermunder, Home, by the heli-pad
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 10:34PM
“Is there any truth in the rumour that Mickey Mouse wears an "Alex" wrist watch?
You ought to cut down on those funny fags, you sound paranoid and delusional. As well as obsessive.
By the way, the twentieth century has been on. They want your "I'm considerably richer than yow" joke back.”
by Alex, Bristol
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 10:21PM
“Too easy, Fireman Sad Stan!
:)
By the way, my job pays considerably more than yours!”
by Stan Fermunder, Home
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 10:12PM
“I take it your obsession with the fire service means you failed the entrance tests then, and stand in abject jealousy as a fire engine goes by?
Stick to flipping burgers Son.”
by Stan Fermunder, Home
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 10:03PM
“It must be very hard in life knowing that your only purpose is to serve as a warning to others.......”
by Alex, Bristol
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 9:00PM
“:) Fireman Sad Stan, or is it just that you like big hoses?!
I left you a little pressie on one of the other news items comments section! See if you can resist replying to it!”
by Stan Fermunder, Home, in the sauna.
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 8:51PM
“Been on the funny fags again? Or have you got a fixation with fire engines?
It isn't only me that thinks you are an object of ridicule.......”
by Alex, Bristol
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 8:42PM
“Been busy on the Fire Engine, Sad Stan?”