Date's set for Bristol to decide on elected mayor

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Profile image for The Post

The Post

THE question Bristolians will be asked in May's referendum has been set down.

A Parliamentary committee yesterday confirmed the date of the vote – May 3 – and also agreed the wording for the question, the answer to which could shape the city's political future.

Ballot papers will read as follows:

How would you like Bristol to be run? By a leader who is an elected councillor chosen by a vote of the other elected councillors. This is how the council is run now.

OR By a mayor who is elected by voters. This would be a change from how the council is run now.

If Bristol votes yes to a mayor, campaigning will begin in earnest, and the mayor elected in November.

Local government minister Andrew Stunell said: "This referendum is about letting local people decide."

The Liberal Democrat minister's public endorsement of the case for a mayor came as party colleague and Business Secretary Vince Cable admitted he was "not a fan" of the policy.

Two local Conservative MPs, Bristol North West's Charlotte Leslie and Kingswood's Chris Skidmore, joined the Delegated Legislation Committee for yesterday's debate at Westminster.

Ms Leslie, pictured, said it was "extremely timely", pointing to the Evening Post's ongoing debate about how to improve the city.

She said: "Our local paper, the Evening Post, has run a very interesting debate on whether Bristol is an underperforming city, a great city punching below its weight.

"I believe Bristol has many great successes. We have great business success, great green credentials, and our media and arts are second to none in the country. But the debate is whether this is despite politics, or because of it. One of the great things that bothers Bristol people is the arrangement of our political system. It couldn't be more timely."

Bristol residents have an "apathy" towards change, Ms Leslie said, because so many previous attempts have failed.

And she said one perceived problem was the frequency of council elections. People are shocked when they learn the salary of the council chief executive, she claimed, while many cannot name the council leader.

Mr Skidmore said he was a "proud Bristolian", despite representing a constituency outside the city's council boundaries.

An elected mayor would be a "shot in the arm" for Bristol, he said.

But he wanted assurances there would be no "mission creep" with powers awarded over his constituency, which lies within South Gloucestershire Council's authority.

Mr Stunell gave an "absolute assurance" that the mayor's powers would be confined to Bristol, saying anything else would require fresh government legislation.

After the hearing Ms Leslie said: "Ask people what they think of Bristol's politics and you usually get some feisty replies.

"The debates about Bristol having the political will to achieve its potential and the prospect of an elected mayor could not be more timely.

"Many people are asking whether Bristol, the second richest city outside London, punches below its weight in comparison to its competitors, in terms of its education record, local transport infrastructure and facilities like arena, conference venues, stadium."

Ms Leslie said the frequency of council elections – with three years out of every four seeing polling in at least some of the city's wards – had added to the feeling that Bristol's politics was "broken".

She said: "Bristol has unusually frequent elections, which means the city is paralysed by being in election mode for a large chunk of most years, damaging long-term decision-making.

"People often feel that because of this we have an ever-changing carousel of elected members, flickering in and out of election-mode, revolving around a static core of unelected officers.

"And this lack of continuity pushes decision-making away from elected members and towards, in most cases hard-working but unelected officials, who make decisions over significant budgets.

"An elected mayor would be accountable, visible and would have the opportunity to find and instigate solutions to improve the city's politics. Moreover, the referendum over whether we have a mayor or not is exactly the right place to air these simmering concerns about Bristol's politics."

21
Tweet this article
Report

21 Comments

  • Profile image for threemasons

    by threemasons

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 7:41PM

    “Surely any elected mayor will still be someone from the poiltical sector with ambitions to be a celebrity figure more important than making change. In the same way Livingstone simply used his position as London Mayor to push Labour party ideas into practice, Boris ha s done the same from a Conservative angle, an elected Mayor of Bristol will simply be yet another political frontman influneced by biased party political will but wearing the mask of the peoples choice. When the low turnout at such an election materialises it will be evident how many don't want a mayor but that is exactly how the political puppet masters keep control. Nothing will change.”

  • Profile image for John_Name

    by John_Name

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 7:05PM

    “@BEP
    Did the police leak any information to you about Chris Jefferies?”

  • Profile image for Rosset

    by Rosset

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 6:25PM

    “The benefit of elections by thirds is that it gives you the (partial) opportunity to ditch a useless or corrupt administration in less than 4 years.”

  • Profile image for BorisLot

    by BorisLot

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 4:48PM

    “I have yet to meet someone who can rationally defend the ridiculous 3 year voting system. How much longer will the council persist with this responsability avoidance scheme?

    Now we have the leader of the council saying no-one wants an elected mayor. Well, we all know why that is. Let's see what the public think when we have the chance to vote, Ms Janke.

    Interesting to see that the Liberal Democrats are solidly against an elected mayor but just in case, Stephen Williams will be keen to take the job should we all vote in favour. I can think of a couple of other candidates as well.

    Vote YES for an elected mayor and YES to end this farcical 3 year voting system and let's drag Bristol into the twenty first century.”

  • Profile image for smoosername

    by smoosername

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 1:31PM

    “@Pogo_T_Clown

    At least we would know you are clown before you get elected! :)”

  • Profile image for Pogo_T_Clown

    by Pogo_T_Clown

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 12:44PM

    “@smoosername

    Be careful what you wish for. One day I may get into power. THEN there'd be a reckoning.”

  • Profile image for smoosername

    by smoosername

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 12:00PM

    “Anything that provides an alternative to the current lot in power, has to be seriously considered in my view.”

  • Profile image for petebartlett

    by petebartlett

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 11:47AM

    “Bristol aleady has an elected (Lord) Mayor!

    The Lord Mayor, however, has very little power (if any). He is elected first as a Councillor, and then by fellow Councillors to be Lord Mayor, and so to be Lord Mayor he has to be elected twice not simply once like the proposed new Mayor.

    What will happen to the city's ancient right to have a Lord Mayor if we also have a DIRECTLTY ELECTED Mayor?”

  • Profile image for Richard34

    by Richard34

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 11:42AM

    “Interesting article but at the same time it's important to note that while the Evening Post has played it's part in the discussion which is shared here by Charlotte Leslie by saying "It's extremely timely", pointing to the Evening Post's ongoing debate about how to improve the city.

    She said: "Our local paper, the Evening Post, has run a very interesting debate on whether Bristol is an underperforming city, a great city punching below its weight".

    Fair enough but the Evening Post has been keeping the city down for many years through ongoing negative stories and by cherry picking news selectively. Some areas are almost neglected by the Evening Post while others have all of the best publicity.
    As a newspaper it's now getting a lot better but it's still a long way from being a a trusted source to make a balanced judgement for Bristol.”

  • Profile image for FromMendip

    by FromMendip

    Wednesday, January 25 2012, 11:39AM

    “The principle of an elected mayor is very appealing.

    If we could be sure that the mayor would be someone of proven experience of successfully running a large organisation, with a 'can-do' attitude, the ability to cut through red tape, to kick backsides where necessary and not worry about being universally popular, then it's a great idea.

    Sadly though we are likely to get a tired and inept local party political hack with all the charisma and go-getting ability of a snail in slow motion.

    Then again it's a chance of perhaps mitigating to a degree the ridiculous Bristol system of re-electing only one third of the council at a time.

    Because of the uncertainty of the character of the candidates I'm still mulling over how I will vote. On balance I will probably vote for a mayor if for no other reason than to try to bring about some sort of change in the torpid, parochial and petty-minded political system in and around Bristol.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters