Councils' praise for bus routes - do you agree?
THE £78 million Greater Bristol Bus Network has been one of the more controversial council projects of recent years.
The brainchild of the four former Avon authorities, it involves changes to 10 major bus routes in a bid to make services more reliable.
In a region that desperately needs better public transport, you would have thought millions of pounds of investment would be seen as a good thing.
Yet week after week the Evening Post has received letters from people with concerns about the scheme.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Work on the 10 projects is now winding down, with the final routes set to be up and running by next month.
Next week we will be speaking to Bristol's man in charge of transport Tim Kent about the GBBN project and what benefits he feels it has brought the city.
So we want to know what you really think. Whether you're a passenger who has used one of the existing routes or a driver who has been affected by alterations to road layouts this is your chance to have your views put to Mr Kent.
You could be a cyclist or a pedestrian that has seen changes along your regular trips because of the showcase bus routes.
Have they made your journey worse or better?
You may have concerns about one of the routes that have yet to be completed.
Traders and residents in Fishponds and Clifton still have objections to showcase routes which go through their areas, though the council says the short term inconvenience of roadworks is worth the long term gain.
These two routes, along with Wells Road, are due to be completed by the end of next month.
Work on the M32 bus lane and the A369 Bristol to Portishead are also due to be finished by March.
The A370 from Bristol to Weston- super-Mare was the first of 10 bus routes to be upgraded, and was unveiled last March.
The A367 Bath to Midsomer Norton route was finished in June.
Two more routes were finished last October, Bristol to Cribbs Causeway via Parkway and Mangotsfield to Cribbs Causeway.
And the A4 Bristol to Bath route was completed at the end of last year, but not before a torrent of criticism from commuters and traders who complained off endless traffic jams.
The four councils say journey times have improved on the routes that have been completed.
The question is, does the public agree?




Comments
by Steve999bs
Thursday, February 23 2012, 11:32PM
“Whiteladies Road is now a death trap for cyclists. A road that suddenly changes width with little warning. On part of the inbound section the road width is little more than a double decker bus. If one of those comes hurtling through and doesnt see you - you are a gonner - no where for you or the bus to swerve. As for the traffic lights by Clifton Down - there is not space for
two buses to pass. As we all know you wait ages for one to come then they all come at once. So if a bus stop can accommodate one/two....when three plus come they block the road and cause an even bigger tailback. As for the build out by the TA centre you can end up waiting here for up to five minutes or risk a dangerous overtake manoeuvre.
So what's going to happen? Cyclists take the only sensible course of action and cycle down the middle of the road. Bingo everything slows down to 10mph result more congestion more pollution and slower buses. And the removing of the cycle lane going up Blackboy Hill - well I pedal up at about walking pace. So the bus will have to wait.
And I thought Bristol was supposed to be cycle-friendly. More like "let's make it so dangerous everyone gives up and goes back to four wheels"
And until someone else takes over the running of the abysmal bus service and runs it for the benefit of travellers rather than lining the pockets of First's shareholders I'm afraid to say Tim Kent's vision of the future is looking as about as popular as the Occupy camp on College green.
What about running affordable buses that actually go where people want?
Where you don't have to change three times to do a mile-long journey -
That run early morning late night regularly?
Where drivers smile and actually have change in their till
Where the buses don't smell of wee
Where drivers help the disabled and parents with small children rather than sitting there behind their screen saying 'it's not my problem love'
etc etc etc”
by DM_Fishponds
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 11:48PM
“@Fuzzhead - "Not sure why I'm suddenly getting lots of red arrows for stating obvious, impartial facts? Obviously some fan of Mr Kent here, or a raging Tory who thinks privitisation is the answer to everything."
Hi Fuzzhead, I don't think that it's a Tory . . .
I think that the rating system could be improved by having two totals, one showing "Total Plus" and the other showing "Total Minus". Then we could see how many 'votes' we get, good or bad.”
by Hipocrite
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 8:52PM
“PS. That was tram, or tube”
by Hipocrite
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 8:51PM
“Went to Prague a couple of years ago. You bought a 80 cent or 1 Euro ticket in the local shops. This entitled you to travel any where for 1 hour, or 1½ hours. Drivers stopped at every stop almost. No money paid on bus at all. Warning about penalties if ticket inspector caught you without one. Tickets were time stamped when boarding. By he way the seat under the bus shelter was electrically heated.”
by SpinyHedgehog
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 8:34PM
“What First are after is a prepay scheme for First alone, rather than one that will inculde Wessex and Abus.
Hence the joke - "London has only one Oystercard, but we'll have two!"”
by Stompeh
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 6:28PM
“Kate_F touches on an important point - one of the major contributors to slow bus services in Bristol is the amount of time spent boarding. The cash system in use really is archaic. I regularly get on the 8/9 and spend more time stopped at the bus stop than actually travelling.
First have recently introduced "smart" ticket machines to most of their buses - however, these are only used for season tickets, 7 day passes etc., whereas the majority of people using the buses are paying a single/return fare.
Since they have already made a large part of the investment (installing the readers on buses) it seems ridiculous that there doesn't seem to be any plan to introduce a pre-pay smart card scheme (i.e. oyster) that would speed up boarding to probably less than a quarter of the time it takes now. Everyone walks past the reader, swipes their card, "beep", done.”
by Fuzzhead
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 4:05PM
“Not sure why I'm suddenly getting lots of red arrows for stating obvious, impartial facts?
Obviously some fan of Mr Kent here, or a raging Tory who thinks privitisation is the answer to everything.”
by SpinyHedgehog
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 3:55PM
“You can always tell a fanatic. They either want to privatise public transport, or nationalise Tesco.”
by Fuzzhead
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 3:43PM
“Exactly, Spigett - that's why we have an expensive, poor service like First able to call the shots with little fear of challenge from BCC. It has to make a profit for its shareholders - they are it's priority by the nature of the animal, not the public. Same goes for privatised industries such as water, electricity etc.”
by Spiggett
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 3:30PM
“"And now they are even trying to blame Mrs Thatcher"
-Privatisation of Public Transport was a complete disaster...”