Councillors urged to support 'secret house' on Avon Gorge rock face
COUNCILLORS are being urged to give planning permission for a controversial “secret house” built on the rock face of the Avon Gorge.
The five-bed home, which would lie just below the terrace of the Avon Gorge Hotel, has been designed so that it would be virtually invisible from the Portway, 160ft below.
-

How the rock face house would look
The developer who has put forward the plan has said that it was deliberately intended to be discreet and would help to put Bristol on the architectural map.
But the scheme has split the community in two, with half believing that the site should never be built on while half have given their support.
Contact us today for a 50% Reduction off of our Management Set Up Fee
Terms: For full Terms & Conditions, contact us today
Contact: 0117 370 7570
Valid until: Saturday, June 06 2015
Developer Satyen Joshi who manages Abingdon-based Chest Properties, bought the site which used to be part of an orchard and garden belonging to a property in Hotwell Road, four years ago for £135,000.
If built, the house would be worth an estimated £1 million.
Mr Joshi has worked with award-winning architects 3W who are behind the Airpoint apartment building which transformed the former Mail Marketing headquarters in West Street, Bedminster.
The new house would have flat, landscaped roofs and the material used would be similar to existing walls of sandstone and limestone rubble.
Access would be from Prince’s Lane which is privately owned by the Avon Gorge Hotel and mostly used for hotel parking.
The council’s planning officers have examined the scheme and are recommending approval in a report to councillors who will consider the issue on Wednesday.
They carried out three consultation exercises with residents and interested bodies and organisations.
This led to a total of 35 objections and 27 responses in support.
Those against claim it would have a negative impact on one of Bristol’s most famous beauty spots and landmarks.
But those in favour say it is a unique scheme which reflects the city’s architectural and engineering heritage.
One of the main objectors is the Clifton and Hotwells Improvement Society which said they were against the house in principle.
They said the site was unsuitable for any building and should therefore be restored as a garden and orchard which it had always been.
But English Heritage, the national body which was set up by the Government to protect buildings and the environment, said the plan was highly unorthodox and reflected the rugged nature of the existing terraces.
It said: “This proposal does not cause us any harm with regard to its impact upon the historic environment.”
The city’s Conservation Advisory Panel opposed the scheme and said: “The public inquiry in 1971 on the hotel extension established the importance of the hillside.
“A dwelling would inevitably have domestic paraphernalia that would damage the view.”
But the Bristol Urban Design Forum said the principle of camouflaging the building into the existing landscape was a well-considered approach.
In their report, the planning officers accept in principle that the site could be used for residential development.
They say: “The building has been carefully designed to blend into the existing landscape and it is not considered that it will harm the two key views from Clifton Suspension Bridge and the tow path.
“It is further considered that the proposal will help the progression of the landscape types from the bridge by reconciling the terraces with the built forms, through appropriate design.”
They say: “There will be no significant harm to the character or appearance of the Clifton and Hotwells Conservation Area, listed heritage assets or the wider Avon Gorge setting including the Grade I Clifton Suspension Bridge.
“There will be no significant harm to the amenity of neighbouring or future occupiers.”
In 1971, outline planning permission was granted by the city council for a 260ft-long, eight-storey hotel next to the suspension bridge.
But an outcry led to a public inquiry and the scheme was eventually turned down.




Comments
by avonside40
Tuesday, July 03 2012, 1:53PM
“I can't be the only person to imagine the prospective owner will be a bald gentleman with a cat, perhaps with a pool containing sharks with frickin' lasers!”
by RobMcCarthy
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:51PM
“I wonder if the Smyth family had to deal with all of this red tape when they wanted to turn Ashton Court into their family home in the 1500's.”
by Lanata
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:12PM
“EP - can you find some new stories to write about?
We had this one months and months ago - it's getting boring !!”
by Mikey_Blake
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 3:09PM
“@pollyxxx
In answer to your question it's the building between the one on the right of it and the one on the left of it, but it's so well camouflaged that nobody knows it's already there except the Builder and the family who live in it.
And because the Council Tax people can't see it either, the residents don't pay Council Tax.
What a wonderful scheme.”
by pollyxxx
Monday, June 25 2012, 11:14PM
“Which one is it????”
by pollyxxx
Monday, June 25 2012, 11:13PM
“Which one is it?”
by MichaelRooney
Monday, June 25 2012, 10:56PM
“What I think is sad is that all these very clever people, the best talent we've got in the country, spend their time energy and resources on projects like this.
When you look at many of the great 19th century architectural structures, especially Brunel's in our area, they were built for a practical purpose. They actually did something to stimulate business and the economy with the eye pleasing features being just an extra bonus.
That's the trouble with this country, too much frivolity and too little industry and invention.”
by Mrs_W2009
Monday, June 25 2012, 9:11PM
“But surely we're already on the architectural map?! Look at the architectural gems this council has approved just down the road at Canon's Wharf. Stunning.”
by Tody123
Monday, June 25 2012, 7:44PM
“its quite clever how they used the words 'hidden' , but its just a house with some camouflage , maybe.
Its just a house really.”
by Waybaloo
Monday, June 25 2012, 4:47PM
“@ Brizzled
Re access agreement with Avon Gorge Hotel
The property will be accessed from the private lane at the back Princes Lane ,which is part of the freehold of Avon Gorge Hotel land. Im sure there is an access easement agreement already in place to be written into the title deeds, its hardly unusual. Alot of properties have rights of access though other properties freehold. In fact there must be one already in place for the existing property on this lane. Regardless, this is a separate civil matter and irrelevant to planning permission.
Re: who will benefit
yes its one house, so? Your interest in this matter is no-ones business but the buyers or sellers. But in answer to the question. A person will buy it , who will benefit from having their "dream home" I suppose, and the seller will benefit with a tidy £1 mil pounds more or less. Avon Gorge Hotel will benefit also for selling off rights of access on their deeds. Whether or not it is unsellable is not for planning council to decide anyway, leave this for market forces to determine this.”