Council to meet parents in Bristol school places row
The 300 Bristol families still waiting to be given primary school places for their children for September have been invited to a meeting at the Council House on Monday.
But it is not looking likely that they will all be successful in getting the four-year-olds into schools near their homes.
-
Council to meet parents in Bristol school places row
The Liberal Democrats, who took control of the council two weeks ago, promised that solving the primary places crisis would be one of their first priorities.
Their Labour predecessors had already begun talks with a number of schools about putting in extra temporary classes for September.
The new cabinet councillor for schools, Clare Campion-Smith, has continued discussions with schools and parents, but some of the suggested schools have said no to taking more children, meaning that other primaries have had to be approached.
The council could not confirm last night which schools were likely to have extra classes but said as much information as possible would be given to the families on Monday.
Mrs Campion-Smith, in her letter to parents, said: "On taking office two weeks ago, I and colleagues were very concerned to find that so many children had not been allocated a place at primary school. We can appreciate that you are going through a very stressful time at the moment as you wait to hear about the second round of allocation of reception places.
"As a new administration, we are keen to get the best solution we can for admissions to primary and infant schools for September 2009. The next task will be to plan for future years so that school places reflect demographic shift more closely."
She has told the families that she and Lib Dem leader Barbara Janke, with the council's interim director for children, Annie Hudson, will listen to all concerns and share information, but will not be able to tell people at the meeting where their child will get a place.
The eight schools Labour said would be asked to consider extra classes were Sefton Park, Henleaze, Little Mead, Millpond, Cabot, St Barnabas, Glenfrome and Hannah More.
Many parents at Sefton Park are opposed to a third reception class, because they think the school site would be overcrowded.
The Lib Dems have already overruled the planned permanent expansion of the school and said they intended to go ahead with a 210-place school on a site nearby known as the Brunel field.
But families in the area – east of Gloucester Road – believe a school of twice that size is needed.
There is a similar problem on the west side of Gloucester Road, where governors at Henleaze Infant School have rejected the idea of a fourth reception class.
Head teacher Pat Jones told parents in a newsletter that she had been surprised to read in the Post about the proposal.
She said on Friday: "We don't want to become a four-form entry school. It would be too big.
"The council's Primary Review was supposed to plan for admissions, but it has not addressed the oversubscription in this area."
Parent Mark Rowe, whose daughter Hannah failed to get into any of the family's three preferred schools, said two new two-form entry schools on each side of Gloucester Road were needed.
He said: "I can fully understand that Henleaze school is unhappy with the way they learned about the proposal, but equally I appreciate the council feels under extreme pressure to seek a resolution to extreme circumstances
"We have been heartened by the strong personal support offered to us by Clare Campion-Smith.
"But I would urge both the school and council to work together. Parents in this part of Bristol have been told there is no Plan B, no alternative solution other than the temporary expansion of Henleaze.
"If it doesn't happen we will be offered schools up to five miles away; we cannot take our children that distance and stay in work; and putting a four-year-old on a bus is simply wrong."







7 Comments
by Rachel, Bishopston
Sunday, March 15 2009, 11:17PM
“I just find it unbelievable that the Headteacher of Henleaze infants found out about this via the evening post. As a parent without a school place, I am pinning my hope on the council consulting these schools properly, with discussion about budgeting and all the other issues that a temporary classroom would throw up. Of course they are going to reject the proposal out of hand, if it is not discussed thoroughly, but with that goes the little hope of a group of parents in that area (LAPSE) who don't have a place. And what is the answer given to LAPSE when they ask Piers Brunning what 'plan B' is following Henleaze's rejection....'there is no plan B'. Unbelievable and frankly not good enough.”
by Clarity, Bristol
Sunday, March 15 2009, 9:57PM
“Can someone confirm that Francesco has taken over from Heather Tomlinson?”
by parent with no school place, N. Bristol
Sunday, March 15 2009, 2:06AM
“Francesco has neatly summarized the rationale behind the primary admissons process in Bristol.”
by Francesco Sinibaldi, Italy
Saturday, March 14 2009, 8:21PM
“Like an oak in a fantasy.
The yellow
sand appears
in my mind
with a rumbling
and delicate
look; you call
me near a
sylvan hedge,
and everything
shines like a
taciturn wind.
Francesco Sinibaldi”
by Ian, Westbury Park
Saturday, March 14 2009, 3:34PM
“Perhaps BCC should explain to the Evening Post exactly how they planned how many school places would be needed this year? They keep talking about "demographic shift" but have made no mention of the increased number of children born in the City in recent years. It's not rocket science is it? Why is it a surprise to BCC that children born in 2004/2005 are needing a place at school this year?”
by parent with no school place, N. Bristol
Saturday, March 14 2009, 11:04AM
“The council saying that there is 'no plan B' is too depressing for words. The council have to sort this out with some kind of temp solution for Sept 09 school starters.”
by Jo, North Bristol
Saturday, March 14 2009, 8:44AM
“I agree with Mark that there is a need for new schools on both sides of the Gloucester Road and that these need to be 2 form entry schools with 60 children joining at reception. I walked past the Brunel site recently and it is clear that many of the houses being built are family houses. If a single form entry school is built at the back the development as proposed, then it won¿t take long for all the places to be taken up by children living in the immediate area. That is great for those families but what about families like us who have lived in the area for ages and will not be offered a place in our nearest schools? The council¿s own projections show a shortage of places year on year for the foreseeable future, so really they have no option but to build what is needed. Also, why are they planning now to reflect the demographic shift, as they call it, when they would have had all the data they needed a few years back¿like when their own planning department approved the building of family homes? I really fear that my child will not be able to fulfil his educational potential if he is sent to school miles away and that he will be punished for the council's lack of planning. In rural areas, it is sometimes inevitable to bus very young children to school but in cities?”