Price of train fares to rise
-
Rail passengers in Bristol face increased ticket prices in the New Year, with some fares rising at more than double the rate of inflation.
Train fares will rise from between six per cent and 11 per cent from January 2.
Those that rise by six per cent are season tickets and peak time travel, known as regulated tickets, with First Great Western, South West Trains and Cross Country.
And journeys which rise by up to 11 per cent will be advance and off-peak tickets, known as unregulated tickets, with Cross Country.
Regulated tickets are fares which can only be increased by the rate of inflation, plus one per cent.
Unregulated fares are those which can be determined by train operating firms.
Cross Country will increase unregulated fares by 11 per cent. First Great Western will increase fares by 6.6 per cent, and South West Trains by 7.2 per cent.
All three train companies defended the fare increases, saying they were needed for investment in improving the railways.
Dan Panes of First Great Western, which operates the Bristol Temple Meads to Paddington line, and local services, said: "It reflects the climate we are in, regarding rising running costs, but it also helps us make the improvements we need.
"We have worked hard to make these increases as reasonable as possible - they are below average across the industry as a while and we have tried to make sure that they are as low as we can make them for our passengers."
Gilly White, spokeswoman for CrossCountry trains, which runs trains through Bristol from Cardiff and Penzance to Birmingham, Manchester, Glasgow and Aberdeen, said: "These changes are necessary to allow us to continue investing in a better travel experience for our customers.
"By 2009 we will have provided over 4,000 more seats on our trains (the equivalent of 21 extra trains), introduced state-of-the-art technology to provide customers with better access to information and the cheapest available ticket for their journey, and be providing a significantly improved onboard catering and service.
"From the outset, the CrossCountry franchise was granted on the basis of reducing the taxpayer's contribution and these changes will support the government's policy of reducing the Department for Transport's financial support to the franchise.
"This support reduces from £238 million in the year April 2008 to March 2009 to only £5 million by 2016, establishing an almost entirely commercial franchise."
Lisa Basham, spokeswoman for South West Trains, which operates the service from Bristol Temple Meads to London Waterloo, said: "It is in our interest to set unregulated fares which we believe represent good value for money.
"For instance lead in advance purchase fares remain unchanged and there are many savings to be had with railcards, advance tickets and other promotions.
"South West Trains continues to invest including £3.5 million on station improvements last year, £1.8 million on security guards, £12 million overall on ticket machines and car park expansions."
Announcing today's rises, the Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc) said the increased revenue would help pay for major investment to improve the railways and deliver better value for taxpayers.
Chief executive Michael Roberts said: "Passengers in recent years have helped pay for 20 per cent more services, and performance in the first half of this year is at the highest level since records began, with more than 90 per cent of trains arriving on time.
"Yet, since 1996, in real terms, overall rail fares have risen by just 5 per cent and standard-class regulated fares are actually lower than they were in the year before privatisation.
"Record performance and better services have contributed to the highest number of passengers travelling by rail for 60 years.
"The January fare changes mean that train companies can continue investing in an even better railway and still offer a range of good deals for customers.
"More than 80 per cent of rail journeys are made using either a price-regulated or discounted ticket.
"And with the real costs of motoring up by over 25 per cent since 1996, rail will continue to be an attractive option for millions of people every day."











25 Comments
View all
by David, Bristol
Sunday, November 23 2008, 1:31PM
“One ot the other reasons people don't use trains fo much other than the extortionate cost is the difficulty in getting to Temple Meads or Parkway. If you drive there you are fleeced for parking before being "robbed" for the price of a ticket. If you are fortunate enough to live on a bus route that passes the station you are at the mercy of First as to whether a bus will turn up or be late or that the driver will actually stop. (not to mention the cost)
Live anywhere else and your journey will take ages and several bus changes (more cost and more time)
Rail travel is fast turning into the "faff factor" as air travel - once you are on the way it is fine but you just waste so much time (and money) at either end of the journey”
by Mum, Hope
Sunday, November 23 2008, 12:17PM
“Having first hand experience of living and working in Sweden and Copenhagen with no car I have seen just how well good public ran transport is. The huge impact it is has on the community as most use it. But that is what it is PUBLIC for the PUBLIC not share holders and managing directors. In both these country's my taxes were higher but I had no car, much lower insurance and child care bills, better working conditions and on the whole life chances. Whilst we have a society that is led by the strangle hold of the tabloid press no real alternative thought on any public service will have a chance. You do not have to look far to see this at work the recent public lynchings over 'Baby P' and the heralding of the 'rights' of politicians fuelled by race hatred is just two examples of how we are not allowed to have any real alternative or imaginative main stream thought in our country . Until this is challenged I fear we will be left with poorly ran services at the expense of the excuse of profit.”
by paul, bristol
Sunday, November 23 2008, 12:06PM
“Spike - I totally agree. A trial was undertaken in a mid-Wales town a couple of years ago, where bus travel was free for a number of weeks. Barely anyone got out of their cars - the increase in bus trips was largely among people who are already bus users.
This shows that most people seem to use high fares as a convenient excuse not to use public transport. If it was free, people would then need to look for another excuse (oh yes, the smelly people they have to sit next to on the bus would be next in the firing line!!).
Generally the UK is an anti-public transport country - we have one of the lowest per capita government subsidies among EU countries. That's why it's not cheap for users and that's why other countries can offer lower fares.”
by spike, bristol
Saturday, November 22 2008, 3:05PM
“Studies have shown that even if you halved the price of public transport it would have little or no effect on the growth of car ownership and subsequent use. In our society your status is judged by what car you drive,any one who cant drive or cant afford a car is seen as a looser.
If public transport was made consierably cheaper (75% or better still free)it might encourage many to leave their cars at home.”
by Richard, Bristol
Saturday, November 22 2008, 10:28AM
“It's good to see we all agree on something, that the public transport here is in pieces.
As some of you have said it's cheaper to buy a return flight to Spain than a return train ticket to london.
I want to add to this by saying 'it's actually cheaper to have a complete holiday in Spain i.e. flights, hostel for 4 nights and food, if you're careful with money than it is for a return train ticket to London'.
If oil prices are based on based on $s and every country pays the same then how can Korea run a high speed KTX train from Busan to Seoul for £22.50 one way and here we need to put the price up from £120 for a far inferior UK service and (excluding Virgin's new trains) a far inferior train as well.
National Express Bristol to London Victoria is an example of how to run reliable, efficient and good service public transport here in the UK, people who say otherwise are in the wrong usually i.e. they are late, bought the wrong ticket, loud on the bus or just enjoy being a problem person. I've been late and had debate but still I was in the wrong! Ask National Express to run the UK's public transport as a group of consultants!!”