Concerns raised over future of wildlife sites
CRITICISM of the green spaces sell off plan has continued, despite Bristol City Council finally agreeing local people should have the final say.
There are 51 sites that are still under threat of sale, as part of the council's parks strategy.
-

The authority had hoped to sell the land to developers to raise money to improve other parks across the city, but there was a major public backlash from people who felt it was like "selling off the family silver".
After the Liberal Democrats lost their majority in last year's elections, they were forced to compromise and at Thursday night's cabinet meeting they finally approved giving the final say to Bristol's Neighbourhood Committees.
A timetable will now be drawn up for when these decisions will be made. Ward councillors for each area will have the final say, after they are discussed at local committee meetings.
But there are still concerns about the process, nearly two years after it began.
Avon Wildlife Trust has long called for green spaces with significant wildlife to be removed the process, but members are concerned they are still on the list of potential disposals.
Director of Community Programmes Steve Micklewright, pictured, said: "These include two Sites for Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI) and 10 Wildlife Network Sites (WNS).
"This is one quarter of the sites proposed for disposal. This indicates that the council is still not taking ecological factors into full account during the process as advised by their own scrutiny committee.
"The Avon Wildlife Trust disagrees with the selling of protected wildlife sites in principle.
"SNCIs are sites of city-wide significance for wildlife and we consider that publicly owned SNCIs should not be sold under any circumstances.
"If Bristol's protected wildlife sites are lost, it will not only have a serious impact on wildlife but on local people and the community.
"The two SNCIs currently proposed for disposal are part of Sturminster Close and the Daisy Field.
"If the decision is taken to dispose of any Wildlife Network Sites, we urge Cabinet to commit to reinvesting the money raised to improve other sites for biodiversity in the relevant Neighbourhood Partnership area."
Green Party member Tony Dyer and Labour councillor for St George West Ron Stone have also raised concerns about the financing of the scheme.
In particular the council has introduced an "incentive scheme", which rewards Neighbourhood Committees that go with the original officer recommendations to sell land.
If they agree they will see a full 70 per cent of money from land sales to pay for parks improvements in their area.
But if they don't go along with the recommendations they will receive less, although exactly how much is not specified.
Executive member for waste Councillor Gary Hopkins said councillors were given the opportunity to amend the incentive scheme but no suggestions were made.
He said: "This city has neglected its parks for 20 years.
"This administration believes in investing in parks and we'll make sure we do it."







7 Comments
by J12345678
Thursday, February 02 2012, 10:08AM
“I find it revealing that when the modern developments are built there is very little greenery (trees, beds, baskets) let alone anything resembling a postage stamp garden and obviously some communal play/social area then forget it!
Look at the remodelling of the centre with the fountains which took a couple of years of BEP pressure till we got some trees to relieve the east euro austerity!”
by green_man
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 3:05PM
“Er...Sadly few lessons seem to have been learned by Bristol City Council on flogging off green spaces as this Post report* demonstrates. We are NOT living in a city where people are genuinely listened to - and certain councillors dont know that they know almost nothing!!”
by green_man
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 3:00PM
“Sadly few lessons seem to have been learned by Bristol City Council on flogging off green spaces. We are not living in a city where people are not genuinely listened to - and certain councillors dont know that they know almost nothing!!”
by SpinyHedgehog
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 2:33PM
“Just what does this Council have against green spaces? Some of these small, nondescript spaces are vital for wildlife. I thought that was the sort of thing Lib Dems cared about, indeed, that's why I voted for them :-( It's clear now that all they care about is a share of power, locally and nationally.
To coin a phrase, I won't be fooled again.”
by ashleyvale
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 1:58PM
“It is vital that wildlife sites are removed from this process and protected.”
by lolly60
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 1:31PM
“Maybe if the new City ground was allowed to be built on the old tip, then they wouldnt have to find a new place on some bit of green land .Think on that the people of LA.whats worse building on some piece of old rubbish tip or on a very nice green land.I know which one i would pick.”
by Feneon
Wednesday, February 01 2012, 11:18AM
“An "incentive scheme"? Just call a spade a spade, will you BCC? It's a BRIBE!”