Climate campaigners place Asbos onto 'Chelsea tractors' in Clifton
A CLIMATE change campaign group has turned the debate about cycling on pavements on its head – by targeting big cars.
Climate Rush Bristol left 'Anti-Social Behaviour Orders' on 4x4s in Clifton yesterday to highlight the vehicles' impact on the city.
-

Campaigners Erin Holmes, Carla Denyer and Harry Holmes have been leaving "asbo" notes on car windscreens
The group claims that owning a so-called "Chelsea tractor" can be as anti-social to other road users as cycling on pavements is to pedestrians due to the space they take up and their damage to air quality.
Harry Holmes, from Climate Change Rush, said: "A few of us wanted to highlight a real problem in our city and the threat to the environment.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
"The idea came out of the choice by some groups to name and shame anti-social cyclists and to brand cycling on pavements as anti-social.
"Riding like an idiot on the pavement is no way to behave but in the grand scheme of things it is a relatively small problem."
The 27-year-old added: "The social impact of cars is much greater than yobs cycling on the high street. We believe that the social impact of having a large vehicle in the city is pretty significant.
"The costs are enormous from vehicles which are blocking up parking spaces and making it difficult to get past while kicking out more than a reasonable amount of pollution in to the air."
Climate Rush's day of action left a new mark on a debate which they believe is often too divisive.
Mr Holmes said: "We don't want to ban all cars. Some people really need to use their cars daily but people on both sides need to consider whether their behaviour is reasonable.
"This is a genuine attempt to promote the city for everyone, whether you drive a car or cycle."
The group said they targeted Clifton as it was an easy choice. Mr Holmes explained that the number of large vehicles in the area far outweighed any other neighbourhood.
The campaign group's actions in Clifton caused a stir among drivers who readily dismissed the activists' goals.
Roger Lawson, a spokesperson from the Association of British Drivers, said: "If it's legal, people should be able to make their own decisions on the matter.
"The tax system already prejudices drivers of large vehicles so why should they now face criticism from the public."
He added: "It's anti-social to drop litter and if this group are leaving leaflets on cars it is reprehensible behaviour to say the very least."
Climate Rush Bristol is the regional arm of the London-based Climate Rush campaign.
The group prides itself on direct action, or "deeds not words".
Their action against anti-social cars came after a campaign by the Bristol Older People's Forum to highlight how many people were cycling on Bristol's pavements.




Comments
by rememberme2
Friday, November 02 2012, 3:57PM
“"Riding like an idiot on the pavement is no way to behave but in the grand scheme of things it is a relatively small problem." - Harry Holmes
Walk through Bristol and open your eyes, this is not a relatively small problem.
Also you attempt to portray those riding on pavement as a small amount of 'yobs', this is not the case, a broad range of people from teenagers to businessmen and women seem to think they have the right in Bristol to use pavements like a warm up route for a cycling race.”
by whammmy
Friday, November 02 2012, 12:00PM
“Its an interesting article.
For me, I do actually find the huge number of 4x4's absolutely perplexing as they are expensive, impractical (for the city) and also environmentally harmful.
But it is a free country, and people can choose what they drive and where they drive it.
A couple of years ago I sold my Audi estate car as i did not need to travel any further than 10 miles daily. I traded it in for a compact city car and to be honest never looked back.
I can park on a sixpence, fill it up for £50 and tax it for nothing.
I think its part of modern life that people (especially the yummy mummy M&S set) put image and status before practicalities.
If only they could learn to park the darned things properly then that would be progress...”
by redmike
Friday, November 02 2012, 8:20AM
“Living in Ashton, illegal parking is always a problem around City home games, concerts or Balloon Fiesta. BCC used to have a downloadable leaflet about parking on its website, clearly stating pavement parking is illegal, parking with any part of your vehicle overhanging a dropped kerb is illegal and a few others. But for some reason the sheet is no longer available, but i did print a copy to show footie "fans" that my driveway is not a parking spot. Lets be honest, blocking pavements is done by the selfish and lazy, not just by 4x4s. Causing wheelchair users, parents pushing prams into a road by blocking a pavement is nothing but a selfish act. As for the above protesters, they should try to educate, not just get peoples backs up with those silly posters.”
by katachua
Thursday, November 01 2012, 8:02PM
“And precisely what does illegal pavement parking have to do with illegal pavement cycling? Other than making it more difficult, that is...”
by DownByLaw
Thursday, November 01 2012, 6:12PM
“I wish they would come to Montpelier and shame all those who own old buses and vans that put out more pollution than modern 4x4's.”
by Bristolexpat
Thursday, November 01 2012, 2:26AM
“Ah, you're right. I wouldn't waste the time and effort.
The leaflet would just be left on the roadside where the car was parked.
How ironic that their envirnmental campaign leaflets are now littering Bristols streets?
Maybe I can sue them for that instead?”
by BenZB
Wednesday, October 31 2012, 7:36PM
“"if I came back To mine and found this leafler on it I'd sue these numptys for criminal damage."
Go on, try it, the magistrate will laugh you out of court or charge you with malicious prosecution for bringing a claim without Probable Cause.
The police tried this one on a protester writing in washable chalk on the pavement (see 'criminal chalkist' blogspot recording the case). The magistrate reprimanded the police for undue interference with the right to peaceful protest and dismissed the case.”
by Bristolexpat
Wednesday, October 31 2012, 7:22PM
“Utter nonsense from the usual loonys...
Are they sticking these ASBOs on 4 X 4s in general or only ones illegally parked?
Because if I came back To mine and found this leafler on it I'd sue these numptys for criminal damage.
Modern 4X4s will spew less in the way of emissions than many older, smaller cars.
And have you ever seen a 4X4 cause an obstruction when parked legally? Of course not.
Modern parking spaces account for these vehicles”
by BenZB
Wednesday, October 31 2012, 5:41PM
“Law and ethics are different matters. Hopefully law mostly approximately follows ethics, but not vice versa. If something is legal that does not mean it is right morally, and if it is immoral -including anti-social behaviour, sooner or later it will hopefully end up being illegal as well. Arguing 'it's legal so it's morally okay' is a totally illogical argument - slavery used to be legal too!
I have relatively less problem with people driving 4x4s in the city than with the constantly shocking frequency of car drivers intentionally using their vehicles as weapons against pedestrians and cyclists, and just generally not looking where they're going, while driving far too fast in residential areas.
I only cycled for years, now I have to drive to get to work, but I could still count the number of times *ever* I've encountered an anti-social cyclist on my fingers, but I encounter incredibly inconsiderate, aggressive, and just plain dozey car drivers normally at least a few a day.
In my experience, the most aggressive car drivers are in Clifton. Once I've even called the police and reported a vehicle's registration number for intentionally accelerating towards pedestrians in the middle of crossing the road.
A lot of older car drivers especially, who didn't have to do the theory test on the Highway Code and haven't cycled on the roads since the roads became 10x busier than when they were young, are incredibly inconsiderate to cyclists e.g. who can't accelerate as fast away from traffic lights up hills. By law, cyclists have just as much right to use the roads and to take up a lane, even if they're going a bit slower than you want to, you still don't have the right to terrorise them.”
by smoosername
Wednesday, October 31 2012, 1:41PM
“@CurtisHewitt - "Sorry if I misread"
No problems. The problem highlited is the pavement being obstructed. If they don't mind cyclists obstructing it then it weakens their cause for targeting 4x4's.”