Bristol mayoral candidate's anger at GCSE marking 'whitewash'
THE deputy leader of Bristol City Council has described a report into the marking of this year's GCSE English papers as a "whitewash".
After investigating complaints that grade boundaries had been changed at the last minute, exams regulator Ofqual announced that the qualification would not be regraded.
-

Jon Rogers
The regulator admitted grade boundaries were higher in exams taken in June exams than they were in papers sat in January, but insisted it would be "inappropriate" to reconsider them.
Head teachers are considering whether to mount a legal challenge, despite students getting an opportunity to resit exams or resubmit work in November.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013
The city council's deputy leader Jon Rogers, who is the Liberal Democrats' mayoral candidate, wrote to the Prime Minister last month demanding a full inquiry into what went wrong with the marking of GCSE English papers this summer.
Ofqual's report said exam boards had acted properly, but had raised the boundaries in June after results given to students who sat exams in January were over-generous.
Dr Rogers said: "This in no way explains why they changed the criteria and why so many of our young people's results have been downgraded."
Several Bristol schools have expressed anger at students receiving lower than anticipated English GCSE grades. Head teachers say many students were left disappointed after being awarded Ds instead of Cs.
Heads at Hanham High School, Bristol Metropolitan Academy in Fishponds, Colston's School in Stapleton, Backwell School and Nailsea School have all been critical of the last-minute changes to the system.




Comments
by BCFCfinker
Monday, September 03 2012, 4:26PM
“@Pelagian
I can tell you're not a kid, you didn't use 'like' every like you know like every other like word, you know what I mean.”
by Pelagian
Monday, September 03 2012, 4:10PM
“I thing its ridculus that i didnt get a a in my englich gsce becis i werkd rilly hard al yer and evryting and to thing that there sayin gsces are gettin esier wan there sooooo not its discusting”
by Jonnyfandango
Monday, September 03 2012, 2:50PM
“@ Gary_Hopkins - interesting how you wont actually say the labour candidates name. Please refer to my previous comment”
by Jonnyfandango
Monday, September 03 2012, 2:22PM
“@ gary_hopkins - Why don't you go away”
by Trymriverman
Monday, September 03 2012, 2:05PM
“Some people seem to be critisising Jon Rogers for taking up an issue of concern for a section of Bristol's population and voicing it with David Cameron? I would expect no less of an elected mayor of Bristol. He's probably just a natural doer, one who isn't too bothered about waiting to be elected to act - some other politicians would be far happier just giving a meaningless sound-bite to the media & saying nothing contrary to the part line of course. Anyway what happened to the big issues with Bristolians over the last few years: infrastructure, an arena etc? The odds on favourite just seems to be talking about nebulous issues like fairness. Was it just a few people making a very big noise? How is it possible to be the front runner without being explicit on plans for infrastructure, for example, which is an area Bristol has fallen so behind on? Although I suppose Labour were the party in Bristol for 50 years, during this decline, so I can understand it's a touchy subject for them.”
by gary_hopkins
Monday, September 03 2012, 12:44PM
“Marshallwalker.
As the first elected mayor of Bristol is either going to be Jon Rogers or the Labour candidate (presumably still waiting on the central committee for permission to speak) rather a lot of people are interested.
Please put your name (presumably real one) forward for inclusion in the ever growing list of independents who seem to either fancy their chances or some free publicity.
There is growing evidence for a thorough overhaul of the exam system but that is not the same as this bodge up of moving the goalposts half way through an academic year.This last has now been admitted but apparently does not require remedy.
Pupils,staff and schools have all been damaged by this farce and action needs to be taken.”
by patcrose
Monday, September 03 2012, 12:17PM
“Of course half the problem is that the teachers can't spell or put a grammar together properly in the first place.No wonder the pupils leave school with poor grades and then can't get a decent job when their employment applications are full of mistakes!.”
by TorysRule
Monday, September 03 2012, 12:14PM
“There was something pretty hilarious with OfQual's response to 'growing pressure'.
"No."”
by FromMendip
Monday, September 03 2012, 12:00PM
“It is unfair to those who took the exams in June compared with those who did so in January.
However, what many have believed for a long time is now shown to be true which is that in the past exam grades have been artificially boosted beyond that which the work merited. There is no doubt that it's been done for political purposes so that governments can boast how well their educational policies are doing.
It's refreshing to have some honesty and reality entering the marking though maybe they should have waited until next year so that everyone would be affected equally.”
by Jonnyfandango
Monday, September 03 2012, 11:39AM
“@@TorysRule - haha, actually just spat my coffee out laughing at that!”