Bristol vandal spared jail after £1 million damage

Trusted article source icon
Friday, May 29, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

A graffiti vandal responsible for an estimated £1 million of damage in Bristol who was warned he would be imprisoned if he continued to breach community punishment breached it for a FOURTH time – but still avoided jail.

Daniel Tyndale, aged 23, of Dove Street, gained notoriety in Bristol by spraying his “tag” on buildings, cars and trains.

After admitting criminal damage, in September 2007 he was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, as well as an order to carry out 300 hours of unpaid work.

Yet Gareth Graham, prosecuting, told Bristol Crown Court yesterday that Tyndale had consistently failed to abide by the order.

The court heard that, for each breach:

In February last year he was given 10 days of extra education and employment training;

In August last year he was given an extra five hours of unpaid work;

In February this year he was given 10 days of extra education and employment training.

It also transpired that six months after being handed the suspended jail term, Tyndale punched 29-year-old Michael Chandler and later pleaded guilty to common assault – after which Judge David Ticehurst made it clear to Tyndale that if he messed up again he would go to prison.

Yesterday the court heard Tyndale did not show up for two further unpaid work stints in February and last month, and he was back in court.

The Recorder of Bristol, Judge Tom Crowther QC, deferred sentence until November 2, telling Tyndale: “Every time you come back you put yourself at risk again of being sent to prison.

“You know the sort of terms involved. I will take no action now; I will give you an opportunity to co-operate and avoid crime.

“If you have done that and come back here in six months’ time, with nothing more to your detriment, I will deal with you in a way that does not add to your punishment.”

James Cranfield, defending, told the court: “Mr Tyndale has had the final realisation he can’t continue breaching the orders.

“For once he’s started to engage in probation in the way he should have done at the start.”

Mr Cranfield said there had been no suggestion that his client had carried out any further graffiti offences. Police had estimated at one previous court hearing that his work had caused £1m worth of damage.

He said that he was now doing artwork within a legitimate group in Stokescroft and had left shared accommodation and moved to a one-person council property five minutes away from his probation office.

In August last year, Judge Ticehurst remanded Tyndale in custody for a week in Horfield Prison while he decided what to do with him.

When the judge had Tyndale brought back to court and asked him what prison had been like, Tyndale replied “terrible”, adding that he would not like to go back.

Judge Ticehurst gave him an extra five hours of unpaid work and was told then that one of Tyndale’s work tasks could be a probation placement to help paint the historic ss Great Britain.

61
Tweet this article
Report

61 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by fred, Californial

    Saturday, May 30 2009, 2:52AM

    “It's vandalism on my property, but it's art when it's on yours.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Daryl, The Radio Station

    Saturday, May 30 2009, 1:06AM

    “Rich kids win everytime...we laughed and lauged at Spencer & you”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by DH, St Mary's

    Saturday, May 30 2009, 12:27AM

    “Awesome, Tricky dicky doo!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Geoff Barrow, Portishead (of course!)

    Friday, May 29 2009, 11:57PM

    “Umm Margaret I love your ideas and concepts, but I have stuff to sell here. Come to my shop, I have canvas with paint splashed everywhere. I know you'd love that.

    If you get stressed again, just do what I do..think... 'what would Tricky do?'”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by margaret, hartcliffe

    Friday, May 29 2009, 11:41PM

    “i think the biggest point of all about this story has been missed altogether, i think the biggest issue is the fact that this lad has been given endless punishmments ignored them all and got away with it , the samme applys to most re offenders how many chances do they get , this only encourages crime of any sort because they know this is the way the courts work and have nothing to fear from being prosecuted”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Clark, Dundry

    Friday, May 29 2009, 11:12PM

    “r1d3r, I really cannot see what points you have raised from my comments. Most artists require sponsorship and do all the better from it.
    There are a couple 'street art' on Gloucester Road (one of which is supported/owned by Geoff Barrow from Portishead), should he back off just because of your naive ramblings?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by r1d3r, bristol

    Friday, May 29 2009, 8:52PM

    “Sorry Clark from Dundry (and other authors of comments) I must pick up on a few of your points. Art is expression, the point of street art is that anyone can use the streets, and why should it simply be restricted to top advertising companies? It may not be to everyone's tastes but I know most of my family members would rather see a painting on a wall than a half-naked air-brushed women in the name of advertising. Aware that this is clearly may not the mainstream view, I suppose we do live in a democracy so it is up to our representatives to decide what should be on your buildings, and if they say that we want high paying adverts then we must, oh and Clark...buying street art is simply ridiculous and perhaps you are missing the point.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Clark, Dundry

    Friday, May 29 2009, 5:48PM

    “I love art in most forms. I was looking at street art and thinking about what I could buy.
    The problem was resolved for me when I got into my car last month and noticed someone has scratched their tag on my bonnet. It wasn't about choice and I didn't get the impression that it was done for the sake of art.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Ian, Redland

    Friday, May 29 2009, 3:48PM

    “George, Although I agree with you to a point and I'm no fan of billboards. They do, I assume generate income and much as we may not like them, are legal. The big difference is what Daniel did will make hard up famlies even worse off and was unsightly. Billboards are only unsightly.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Lord Grottybottom, under-the-bridge

    Friday, May 29 2009, 3:38PM

    “I agree with George that billboards are unsightly and should fall into any thinking person's definition of 'eyesore,' if not vandalism.

    The defacing of billboards is probably the most delightful aspect of graffiti culture. I enjoy seeing what's being done to the BNP billboards about town.
    All billboards are fair game for creative vandalism.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters