Bristol's parking zones revealed
People in Kingsdown and Clifton Wood have been sent maps showing them where they may have to pay to park under the proposed Residents Parking Zones (RPZ).
The schemes were proposed after residents living in the pilot zones complained they cannot park near their homes due to commuters using spaces in the morning and then walking into the city.
They have also raised concerns about students taking up a large number of spaces, and of poorly parked vehicles blocking access for the emergency services.
Once people vote on the finalised pilots, the city council cabinet will have the final say, with the authority to have the zones up and running by the end of the year or early 2010.
The maps show a boundary for each pilot scheme, and questionnaires quiz residents on their car ownership, what kind of scheme they would like to see and any parking problems they have.
The results will then be used by the council to draw up a detailed scheme for each area, intended to address inner-city parking problems.
Once that scheme is produced, residents will be given the chance to vote yes or no.
Anyone living within the zones would pay £30 for one vehicle, £110 for two and £310 for three, and up to £50 for visitor permits.
Pay and display bays would be provided in each zone, but buying a permit does not mean a guaranteed space outside a person's home.
In Clifton Wood the proposed zone is bounded by Victoria Park to the north, Hotwell Road to the south, Berkeley Place to the east and Clifton Wood Road to the west.
The Kingsdown zone is bounded by Cotham Road to the north, St Michael's Road to the south, Dove Street to the east and stops just short of Woodland Road to the west.
A number of roads are split by a blue line on the map. It appears that if you were to park two cars on either side of the line in a split street, one would have to pay and the other not.
The leaflets address a number of concerns raised by supporters of the zones.
A House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) would be entitled to the same number of passes as other houses, but tenants would not be able to apply for them as individuals.
The same rule would not apply to a house divided into six individual flats, as each flat could apply for up to three permits.
The questionnaires state residents in future, low car ownership developments may not be eligible for permits.
Yes to RPZ campaign group member Stephen Perry, 64, of Clifton Wood, said: "The questions appear to be designed to make sure the officials gain a good understanding of the needs of our streets.
"If the final scheme is well designed it will make life easier not only for local residents but for the emergency services and tradesmen working in our area.
"We will be issuing a leaflet to all households urging everyone to complete the survey forms by the deadline date. It is in everyone's interest to do so.
"We want a parking scheme but not just any parking scheme. It must be well conceived if it is to earn support when there is a yes/no vote."
Last summer the council sent out 53,000 questionnaires to homes across the city asking people whether they wanted RPZ.
Although the majority of people in Bristol said no, in six areas more than 50 per cent of people said yes.
All six are around the existing Controlled Parking Zone in the centre of the city.
The consultation came in for heavy criticism from opponents who felt it was biased in favour of the zones, and who fear introducing RPZ in one area just moves parking problems to the area next door.
Opponents of the zones feel the latest consultation exercise is no better than last year's.
Keep Parking Free group member Bernard Cooke, 53, of Clifton, said: "Sadly, we seem to have another sales document from the council.
"To say that a 'residents' parking scheme is planned for your neighbourhood' in the very first sentence of the document suggests that the council has decided what it wants to do, whatever the rest of the document might say.
"And to explain that an annual permit cost of £30 is 'equivalent to nine pence per day' is a technique used by insurance salesmen.
"To launch a consultation in two of the areas of the city with the highest density of university students and staff during the Easter vacation is almost unbelievable, especially after the criticism the council faced last year for carrying out a previous consultation during the summer vacation."
A council spokesman said: "We appreciate that people may be on holiday for some of that time, but we hope that the survey being open for a month will enable people to complete it even if they are on holiday for some of that time.
"The blue line on the map shows the area where people asked us to draw up a proposal in last year's consultation.
"November's cabinet report stated that these were not intended to be the final, fixed boundaries.
"As we have explained in the letter, everyone living within the yellow line on the map will be able to vote yes or no to the final scheme.
"The point about adjacent properties is, however, a valid one.
"Unfortunately, wherever there is a boundary we will get the situation where one property is within it and the next one is outside it.
"If an RPZ goes ahead, we will make sure that the boundaries are operationally viable."
The deadline for returning the questionnaires is May 8.
Operating hours:
9am-5pm, Monday to Friday in Kingsdown.
8am-9pm, Monday to Saturday, Clifton Wood.
Cost: one permit £30, two permits £110, three permits £310.
First permit free of charge for lowest polluting and electric vehicles.
Permit costs to be held for first three years of scheme, afterwards will increase with inflation.
Each zone to include at least 1,000 households.
First 50 visitors get permits free, then 50 more at £1 each.
Pay and& display bays will be free for first 15 minutes.
Junctions and crossing points will be protected by double yellow lines.













7 Comments
View all
by Tony, Bristol
Thursday, April 16 2009, 5:10PM
“Edward you put it in a nut shell well done, I couldn't agree more with you, by the way the questionaire now sent to the residents is well loaded, and clearly biased, as an example what the hell differince does it make if you are white with Iresh descent to name but a few of the crap questions that in no way relate to the issue in hand and that is parking, come on Bristol get your act right and pull your fingers out? stop trying to fudge things, I also note you want zones with a minimum of 1k households to make it pay!!!!! what planet are you on?
I did it on line and even had a fight with user name and password? CRAP!”
by Edward, Clifton
Wednesday, April 15 2009, 6:31PM
“Having lived in area for over a decade I'm not aware of any large scale so-called "commuter" issue. There are too many residents to make it a practical issue. The "yes" campaigners can only put forward reasons to improve their own (selfish) convenience. Other road users are equal beings. Compared to my Clifton street, Cliftonwood has easy parking with many free spaces available. The scheme does nothing for the environment, only raise revenue for the council. No surprise seemingly duplicitous winner-takes-all hedge-fund style democracy is being used to try ram these schemes through. They are relevant to all residents of Bristol, so for some to shout down others with personal attacks is both outrageous and pure thuggery. KEEP PARKING FREE!!”
by Chris, Clifton
Wednesday, April 15 2009, 1:29PM
“DICK:
Bearnard is probably concerned like the rest of us that the permit parking will be extended to where we live in Clifton - why should I pay to park outside my house?
!!KEEP PARKING FREE!!”
by Mark, Stoke Bishop
Wednesday, April 15 2009, 8:27AM
“Why is it only the views of the people who live in the area that are perceived to matter? I do not live anywhere near the areas in question, nor do I park there.
I am offended by the PRINCIPLE that a sub-section of the population can vote for itself to enjoy sole usage of public property.”
by Dick, Cliftonwood
Tuesday, April 14 2009, 9:14PM
“I don't know where 'Tony' lives but I do know that Bernard Cooke lives outside the area proposed for the Cliftonwood RPZ. It's therefore strange that he appears to be the most vocal critic of the scheme and has issued a string of ill-informed and misleading leaflets about an issue that doesn't affect him and his locality.
As someone who does live in the proposed area, I personally welcome the consultation as a way to refine views on the operation and boundaries of the proposed RPZ pilot.
The idea of pilots is to see how something works. If it doesn't work and is found to be unacceptable to the people who live in the area, then it can be abandoned. We will at least have tried something rather than simply giving way to the eternal bleating of people like Bernard who clearly feel that we can continue to watch residential areas used as free car parks by commuters or buried by households that feel that it's acceptable to have as many cars as they wish irrespective of the impact on the urban and global environment.
Given that Bernard and many other vocal opponents live outside the proposed RPZ, I can only assume that their objections are primarily driven by a suspicion that commuters will shift their parking habits and inconvenience them.”