Bristol road plans need Government OK
Plans for a £540,000 redesign of the road junction at the
top of Blackboy Hill in Bristol could move a step closer next
week.
A scheme is afoot to create three new sets of traffic
lights, two signal upgrades, new bus lanes and cyclepaths at
the busy corner of the Downs.
The work would form part of the Greater Bristol Bus Network
(GBBN), which is a £70-million project by councils in the
Bristol area and First to improve bus transport around the
city.
Under the West of England Partnership, all four councils in
the former Avon area – Bristol City, South Gloucestershire,
North Somerset and B&NES – hope to have the GBBN complete
by 2013.
Whiteladies Road and Blackboy Hill form one of 10 key
'corridors' in the network and those driving the scheme want to
move the project forward.
But first they need to ask Bristol City Council's Downs
Committee if they can apply to the Government for special
permission to change the nature of the park.
The Downs is protected by an Act of Parliament from 1861,
when it was given to the people of Bristol by the Merchant
Venturers for public use.
So permission is required by the Government whenever part of
it is needed for a new use.
Even then, it must be proved that there is no overall loss
of public land under the development.
So a key part of the proposal is to close the unnamed
one-way road which links Stoke Road to Redland Hill, turning it
into a cyclepath and footway instead.
With this, project leaders claim that there will be a 280
square metre gain in the amount of public land on the Downs
after the development is complete.
"These are some of the early works funded by the £42-million
grant to improve the bus infrastructure across the West of
England that will help improve traffic flows and also make a
positive difference to cyclists and pedestrians in the area,"
said Mark Bradshaw, Bristol City Council transport
representative on the West of England Partnership.
Whiteladies Road and Blackboy Hill forms one of the busiest
routes in and out of the city centre and is heavily laden with
rush-hour traffic most weekdays.
Officers behind the GBBN scheme have said they appreciate
that it will cause delays to commuters while the work is being
carried out.Work is due to start in early 2009, around April,
and is set to last for six months.
Members of Bristol's Downs Committee will discuss the
proposal on Monday.













13 Comments
View all
by Steve, Southville
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 7:31PM
“This latest half million pound wheeze will be yet another total fiasco from a council so blindingly incompetent when it comes to transport that they shouldn't EVER be allowed to make another decision about how we get around our city.
As usual, the losers will be motorists, cyclists, pedestrians and users of the diabolical WorstBus. The winners will be the shareholders of WorstBus and the buffoons who dream up with bonkers, traffic-light obsessed schemes.
Labour have had over 11 years, both locally and nationally to sort out Bristol's traffic problems and to date they've done SOD ALL.”
by MendipMan, Wurzel Country
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 6:39PM
“Tina falls into the trap of so many people. Motorists do not pay a road tax at all. They pay for an excise licence. The idea of the Road Fund Licence was discontinued almost as soon as it was started. The excise is a general tax used for all sorts of government expenditure. The traffic engineers at Bristol City Council seem an ineffectual bunch. Remember the nonsensical Whitchurch Lane traffic calming put in at tens of thousands of pounds and then having to be taken out for almost as much? Goodness knows how many thousands were spent on the West Town Lane/Bath Road junction which was worked on for a year. The result is that traffic queues are just as long. Why cannot traffic lights react to sensors which measure traffic flow? Fifty years ago we had traffic light pads which certainly could. The other day at 5pm the inbound Bath Road lane at West Town Lane junction was empty yet the outbound turning right lane into West Town Lane was solid with traffic yet still had to await the pre-programmed traffic light sequence before traffic could move. Sensors would be able to over-ride such occasions.”
by alex, Bristol
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 5:53PM
“Tina, you said "... the only reason the roads are ever altered is to improve the use of them for motorists, it is motorists after that pay the road tax... "
If this is the case, and sadly, I think you're, therein lies the problem. The very reason why roads are congested. why pedestrians and cyclists feel at danger all the time. If this is selfishly the reason, we'll never find alternative means of transportation and it will remain where people pay £1000s each year to sit gridlocked, getting fatter in a traffic jam.
I think people are slowly coming round to realising cars are not the future of urban transportation, people are slowly becoming educated through discussion like this. Certainly not from local councils.”
by Mr Angus Charlesworth, Clfton (in a BIG house)
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 4:32PM
“They' have recently spent about the same amount of money, £500,000 or so "Improving" the roundabout at the bottom of Jacob's Wells Road, where it meets Anchor Road and the Hotwell Road.
It has succeeded in causing bigger jams than used to be there, especially coming down Jacob's Wells Road as you now have to wait at a Red Light when you can clearly see the roundabout to be completely clear. It is totally illogical.
HOWEVER it has made the crossing much easier and safer for pedestrians, as they now have their own set of lights. Trouble is they have put in those bloody-awful "Puffin" lights, so you have to look at the side, instead of in the direction you are crossing. The logic defies me. Can someone explain?
Also the pedestrians, at least 99% of the time run across in natural traffic breaks, so their light-sequences are totally and utterly wasted. One would think in this day-and-age that some logical sensors would tell there was no-one waiting and skip that light-sequence, same goes for non-existent cars as well. Grrrr.”
by LordClifton, Clifton
Wednesday, August 27 2008, 4:29PM
“Just before last Xmas, the traffic lights on the junction of Victoria Street and Counterslip (i.e. Between Bristol Bridge and Temple Meads) were out of action for about 2 to 3 weeks. The result was free-flowing traffic, drivers slowing down to let each other out and taking it in turns to have priority, and no queues of traffic backing up Victoria St to Bristol Bridge - and most important of all reduced journey times. Once the traffic lights were reinstated it was immediately back to the usual gridlock. If Bristol CC really gave a toss about traffic flow it would have sent somebody down to monitor the position with a view to removing these unnecessary lights. Alas as is evidenced by this wasteful scheme at Blackboy Hill we know it is hell-bent on using our money to skew the argument against cars by paving over the roads!”