Bristol parks sell-off delayed

Trusted article source icon
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Plans to sell off 90 acres of parkland in Bristol will be delayed because the recession has seen land values plummet.

Bristol City Council could hold off for several years until land values rise again before pushing through its plan to sell parcels of green space.

A report to the council's Quality of Life Scrutiny Committee meeting on Monday says the recession would have an impact on the 'rate of progress' of the plan.

It says: "The strategy was formulated as a 20-year proposal and spans more than one property cycle, so the recession does not invalidate it, but it will delay implementation of many proposals.

"The collapse of the development and property markets will reduce cash flow in receipts from land sales."

When the plan was agreed in February last year, the council said the sale of "marginal, surplus land" would raise cash for improvements to remaining open spaces and to create 70 new play areas over the next 20 years.

A decision on which patches of Bristol City Council's 3,700 acres of parkland should go could be made by the autumn.

The council has been scrutinising areas of green space in the city under its Parks and Green Space Strategy since last summer.

A specially-appointed team began by looking at open spaces in the south of the city and will move its 'mapping exercise' to parkland in the north of the city this year, starting in Horfield and Lockleaze this month.

The Bristol Parks Forum, which represents users of more than 100 community parks in the city, is being consulted during the review along with community groups.

A public consultation on the council's proposals will be held between June and August before a decision is made on what land to put up for sale.

The committee report says the council has been satisfied by the response to its work to identify which land could be sold.

It says: "So far, there has been a reasonable response in terms of numbers of local people engaging, but officers are aware that it is a time-demanding process and only people able to devote a significant time will participate fully."

Bristol Parks' Forum spokesman Fraser Bridgeford said: "My understanding is that the consultation process is going quite well but some of the things are going to be controversial because it involves selling off land.

"The over-riding factor is housing. There is so much demand for new homes sites in Bristol.

"The recession will slow things down but it doesn't change the strategy or the council's goals."

It was originally suggested that up to 200 acres could be sold to raise £100 million for the city council, which owns 400 parks and open spaces. And there were fears that only half the money gained from the sale would be spent on maintaining parks.

But the ruling Labour cabinet agreed to sell just 90 acres of lower value land – about 2.4 per cent of public space in the city.

The cabinet also agreed a minimum of 70 per cent of the proceeds would be reinvested into Bristol's parks and green spaces, with the rest for priorities such as housing, transport and leisure facilities.

Bristol South Green Party said it was "crazy to improve an area by selling its assets" and the Lib Dems accused the ruling Labour group of selling off parkland in order to balance the books of the authority.

Of the impact of the recession on the plans, Bristol City Council spokeswoman Helen Hewitt said: "We might have to give it five or six years and review the situation.

"We might be in the situation where we know a piece of land could house half a dozen family homes but it might not be worth selling the land now. At least we'd have identified it and we could sit on it until the market picks up."

10
Tweet this article
Report

10 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Tony Lewis., Horfield

    Monday, January 12 2009, 9:45PM

    “Throughout my four years of campaiging in Horfield within various groups, Horfield Common has been sited as in need of refurbishment, yet frequently fell on deaf ears when requested. Why?

    In the meantime as Chair of a Residents Association we identified and requested monies to refursbish green space at Maskelyne Road Open Space. With colleagues on the abolished Horfield and Lockleaze - Area Housing Committee we bid for and secured £130,000 of financial support and the park is now an inspiring improvement with Phase 2 to be completed shortly. Also refurbishing the victorian benches at Gainsborough Square, Lockleaze.

    If we local volunteer campaigners can make significant progresses such as this from the outside - then what justification is there that Horfield Common is only now in the cycle of election times being considered for upgrades?

    The Grade II listed urinal has rusted away for decades, the railings at Muller Road are not just an eyesore but a significant Health and Safety concern along with light shed from victorian lamp standards being inefficient enabling serious assaults in recent years. The decayed benches offer no respite and the play equipment at Dorian Rd is less inviting than it was back in 1986.

    Despite the success of our local school's campaign the fountain at Wellington Hill West/Kellaway Avenue has reverted back to being unlit and dry, car clamping licences were left to expire creating havoc on Rover's matchdays whilst long since expired 'No ball games' signs were vandalised and dumped in local lanes.

    As an arterial route into our city and the lungs of Horfield, I welcome improvements planned for Horfield Common and it's people but ask - When Parks have maintenance budgets - Why did it take so long that we now require refurbishments due to lack of maintenance ? surely more could have been done over the decades?

    Tony Lewis - local campaigner.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by James S, Bristol

    Monday, January 12 2009, 12:27PM

    “Dee Jarlett,

    The trouble with using factories as housing is that fairly often the land undreneath is contaminated with various unpleasant things..

    Some times the contamination isn't to deep and the soil can be shipped off to landfill, sometimes it isn't an option.

    Factory conversion also tends to result in lots of apartments rather than the much needed 3 bed+ family units that are needed in the city; an individual shop being converted would only (unless it's a very big shop) make 1-2 units and require the defuncting of a shop (it'd need regrading through planning from retail to domestic use)
    Selling off shops for housing is frowned on - local shops provide diversity, charicter and focal points for local communities.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by steven, germany

    Monday, January 12 2009, 10:05AM

    “Maybe they should sell off that green open space outside thier own office,s to build house,s or flat,s.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Steve, Cotham

    Monday, January 12 2009, 12:13AM

    “The council can't sell of the downs as it is protected by act of parliament. That leaves Filwood, Lockleaze -purdown camp anyone?- and other bits where they think they can make some money.

    Remember that article from two weeks back where lockleaze was described as a "forgotten quarter". Selling off the greenery would make it less forgotten, but wouldn't otherwise benefit the area”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Dee Jarlett, St Werburghs

    Monday, January 12 2009, 12:05AM

    “What a relief that we have more time to stop the council from building houses on our valuable green spaces. We must make sure that the parks and open spaces (such as Purdown in Lockleaze) that make Bristol such a wonderful place to live in, remain for the people of our city and our children. There are plenty of factories and shops closing down.... turn those into housing and leave some places where we can keep in contact with nature. The health, happiness and well-being of the population of Bristol depends upon it.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters