Bristol clamping case thrown out of court
THE case of a wheel clamper accused of clamping vehicles in Bristol without permission has been thrown out of court.
Peter May, 36, faced a two-day trial at Bristol Magistrates' Court after pleading not guilty to a series of clamping offences.
-

Case over: Peter May had denied a series of clamping offences
He originally faced six charges, but one, that he falsely claimed he was allowed to clamp vehicles for financial gain at an address in Bedminster on February 28 was withdrawn due to a lack of evidence before the trial began.
Magistrates then dismissed two more – that he immobilised vehicles without a licence between March 17 and 27 – on Monday afternoon, on the grounds there was no case to answer.
The three others – that he falsely claimed he was allowed to clamp vehicles for financial gain, at one address in Clifton and another in Kingsdown, between February 28 and March 27 – were abandoned on Tuesday morning.
The case began on Monday, with four witnesses giving evidence for the prosecution case.
The court heard Mr May, of Hamp Brook Way, Bridgwater, had worked for Able Parking Security Ltd with a man called Mr Blair, and the company put up signs at private land sites threatening clamping without the landowner's permission.
The two locations were Kings Road in Clifton, owned by David Bell, and Highbury Villas, Kingsdown, owned by Austin Boyle.
They admitted there had been parking arrangements before they purchased the respective sites, and they had allowed them to continue although weren't aware of the details.
Yesterday morning Kevin Withey, prosecuting, told the court the Crown Prosecution Service had reviewed the situation and decided there was no case to answer.
He said: "We have a responsibility to keep cases under review and decide whether there is a reasonable chance of conviction and whether it is in the public interest.
"The background to this is there were areas where vehicles were being clamped illegally by a company.
"Mr Blair has been dealt with separately by way of a financial penalty.
"The company is no longer operating.
"It is my view that in respect of the evidence as it has come out, there is no reasonable likelihood of Mr May being convicted and so I invite you to dismiss the case."
Brian Carrick, defending, said: "Even if the case had gone to its conclusion, the Crown had difficulties.
"There are five tenants of shops (in Kings Road) but the Crown could not prove evidence of where cars are specifically positioned. The Crown must prove cars were in spaces where they shouldn't be and were clamped.
"There was the evidence of the two landowners – one accepted he had written to the company while the other had a meeting which may have left Mr May and his erstwhile colleague with the illusion they had permission to clamp. So long as they thought they had permission, that's good enough.
"The case is doomed to fail and the dead horse has been flogged long enough."
Magistrates agreed and Mr May left the court without penalty. He declined to comment outside Bristol Magistrates' Court.







9 Comments
by justin, Bristol
Wednesday, November 19 2008, 6:17AM
“Why should I make hard work of it GinerRog. I don't want a hard time and women arn't going to hit me that's common sense. The elderly should know better then to park in these places anyway”
by GingerRog, Bristol
Wednesday, November 19 2008, 6:05AM
“It seems to me it is very selective who some of the wheel clampers target. Targetting the elderly for a start - disgraceful. Stating women should not be on the road anyway - sexist. You don't target men because they give you too much of a hard time - gutless.”
by justin, Bristol
Wednesday, November 19 2008, 2:03AM
“Before you all judge wheel clampers you should know what we put up with. Women crying because they can't afford the fine. Old people using their age and hopeing for the sympathy vote. Worst of all are disabled drivers who think they can park where they want and just wave the blue badge at you.”
by justin, Bristol
Wednesday, November 19 2008, 12:14AM
“Money, money Money, it's a clamper's world.”
by daren, bristol
Tuesday, November 18 2008, 9:47PM
“but you dont have to pay a pushy salesmen. you are saying that you select victims . seems to constitute abuse mate”
by justin, Bristol
Tuesday, November 18 2008, 9:17PM
“Good news for us wheel clampers, we need to make a living to. I tend to look at clamping women and old folk as men tend to give me too much of a hard time. The old ones just pay up. Before you get on your moral high ground I'm no different to a pushy salesman”
by fred, USA ex pat
Tuesday, November 18 2008, 2:31PM
“The case illustrates why laws should not be enforced "for profit".”
by Steven, North Bristol
Tuesday, November 18 2008, 1:08PM
“Would you rather someone was prosecuted even though there was little or no evidence against them?”
by John B, Bristol
Tuesday, November 18 2008, 12:47PM
“So looks like another Yob in a suit has got away again.! !.”