Bristol area councils use terror laws to catch litter bugs
Councils used anti-terror laws to monitor residents flouting planning laws, litter bugs and even their own employees.
Surveillance operations were mounted by officials at Bristol and North Somerset councils more than 150 times over the past five years, records reveal.
-
Bristol area councils use terror laws to catch litter bugs
Local authorities were given powers that were originally only used by police and the security forces to help in the fight against terrorism.
But admissions that officials have used them to check up on residents who commit minor offences such as dropping rubbish has sparked furious claims they are operating a "snoopers' charter".
The Liberal Democrats, who uncovered the information, called for major curbs on who can use the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa).
Local government spokeswoman Julia Goldsworthy said: "This Government sees civil liberties as little more than a temporary inconvenience. Slowly but surely, freedoms have been eroded.
"We're now in a situation where dog fouling is considered enough to warrant surveillance by council officials. Unless the law is reformed, it risks becoming a snoopers' charter. Surveillance powers should only be used to investigate serious crimes and must require a magistrate's warrant."
Bristol City Council has used the power 132 times to monitor residents it believes have dropped litter or been involved in anti-social behaviour, fly-tipping and fraud.
According to Freedom of Information records, North Somerset Council carried out 33 operations, including one over planning rules and another that involved monitoring an employee. No records were available for South Gloucestershire and Bath & North East Somerset .
Local Government Minister John Healey has written to councils to warn them Ripa should not be used for minor crimes.
A city council spokesman said: "Surveillance is necessary to tackle fly- tipping in some cases – particularly as the offence is often carried out secretively at night and the culprit leaves no evidence as to where that waste has come from.
"The public are outraged at the way a tiny minority dump waste and fly-tip in and around this city and they expect us to use the powers we have to act where we can, which is what we try to do where it is reasonable and legal to do so.
"We don't use Ripa powers in every case and we make a careful assessment of where its use is necessary and appropriate."
A spokesman for North Somerset Council said: "The council carries out investigations ranging from trading standards to licensing and benefit fraud. Sometimes these investigations will require the use of surveillance.
"The report we received following the Office of Surveillance Commissioners visit in June 2008 was complimentary and the Inspector and Chief Surveillance Commissioner were satisfied with the overall arrangements in place at North Somerset Council.
"We are confident that our low-level use of surveillance is both fair and proportionate."







5 Comments
by Martin, Clifton
Sunday, March 29 2009, 12:40AM
“If this (RIPA) legislation was brought in specifically to target terrorism, then why are they using it for minor crime?
Laws like this impact on our freedoms and rights, and whilst this may be justifiable for use against terrorists, it is not justifiable against dog walkers.
The current government is trying to introduce even more anti-terrorist measure like ID cards, longer arrest times etc. How do we know that even more stringent legislation will not be misused when it is brought in? Will the council monitor your email if they suspect you of wasting too much water?”
by Mark, Bristol
Sunday, March 29 2009, 12:00AM
“Paul, thats because those people have not knowningly been monitored.
What doesn't directly affect them they don't care about.
Anyway, yes, this is about justafiable usage. I wouldn't mind if they used it for the things they have done, providing that they are doing it correctly.
The reasons they have given are not to do with anti-terror surveillence :/”
by Gertbigwheels, lightfootsunseeker@yahoo.co.uk
Saturday, March 28 2009, 7:26PM
“Go around Mc Donalds or Burger king at night and see the piles of litter and happy meals.Even the contents of car ashtrays.I think these people should be chained to a litter gang and made to pick up rubbish all day and night.”
by Grahame, Central Bristol
Saturday, March 28 2009, 4:31PM
“That, Paul, is an absolutely excellent point!
I have a couple of additional points. I'm not in favour of RIPA myself, feeling the capacity of the State to surveil our lives has become intrusive. On the other hand, some intrusion is undoubtedly necessary provided it's proportionate.
150 uses of RIPA powers over 5 years between the two councils at least shows they're using it sparingly and cautiously. But public concern is more focussed on whether they're using it justifiably. It wouldn't take a change in the law for BCC to announce they'd seek court oversight of RIPA use; only a change of policy. Voluntarily adopting curbs could go some way to assuaging public concern.”
by Paul, Bristol
Saturday, March 28 2009, 12:25PM
“So to put this into perspective...
We had a number of idiots complaining about Google Street View which takes a snap shot of your home from the last 2/3 years and can be removed on request.
And yet not one of these idiots complains about this targeted surveillance in real time that you cant request to be removed.
Hmmmm.”