Bristol ambulance service given weak rating

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

The ambulance service that responds to emergencies in the Bristol area and a city hospital trust have been rated as weak by a health regulator.

Great Western Ambulance Service (GWAS) and North Bristol NHS Trust (NBT) were among only three health providers in the South West to receive the worst ranking for the quality of the services in the latest Care Quality Commission (CQC) report.

Health providers were ranked according to the quality of services and financial management.

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (UHBristol) received a good ranking for the quality of its services and an excellent rating for its financial management.

Weston Area Health Trust (WAHT) was ranked as fair for both services and finance, while Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (AWP) was rated fair for its services and good for financial management.

All four primary care trusts in the Bristol area were ranked as good for commissioning and good or fair for financial management. Both GWAS and NBT were given a fair rating for their finances.

The main areas where NBT was marked down were under the banner of safety and cleanliness, including child protection and infection control.

It was also noted too many operations were being cancelled at Frenchay and Southmead hospitals and patients were not being re-booked within 28 days.

Both NBT and UHBristol were marked down for failing to see 98 per cent of patients at Accident and Emergency departments within four hours.

At NBT, chief executive Sonia Mills said the target was being met 97.2 per cent of the time and since April, UHBristol has been performing above the target.

GWAS failed to reach enough of its patients within the required time scale, including life-threatening cases.

The CQC also found that the ambulance service was not meeting standards for the time to reperfusion, restoring blood flow after a heart attack, the management of asthma, stroke and hypoglycaemic attack.

GWAS chairman Tony FitzSimons said: "Last year was a time of great change. Many changes in the second half of the year are now resulting in faster response times and other improvements."

Miss Mills of NBT said: "It was clear we had been so focused on getting the improvement and seeing the results of the infection rates coming down that we were not presenting it in a robust way to the trust board."

Dr Graham Rich, chief executive of UHBristol, said: "We are delighted to achieve an 'excellent' rating for quality of financial management."

WAHT chief executive Lorene Read said: "It is disappointing that we have been pulled down overall by just a couple of categories where, the CQC does not feel we have produced data that is robust enough."

11
Tweet this article
Report

11 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by sally, Weston

    Friday, October 16 2009, 12:34AM

    “Looking at the detail of the report for WAHT, the trust was scored in the bottom 1.8% of all acute trusts in two key aspects of patient safety - incident reporting and learning as well as clinical supervision. This reflects our family's experience of Weston General.
    Our experience of the ambulance service was first class.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Anon, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 6:37PM

    “What to say, I actually work within the trusts mentioned and also have the pleasure of occasionally working alongside the GWAS crews and I have to say that all of the frontline staff responding to emergencies and working in the hospital wards/departments do an amazing job and often in bizzare and extreme circumstances.

    The problem I hate to say is on the administrative side, both at a local and government level. For example, the door to hospital time is impieded by the use of rapid respoders. Whilst they do an amazing job, arrive quickly and are normally higly skilled and experienced this has come at the cost of longer waits for a full ambulance crew to then transport to hospital. Whilst this satisfies the managers need to meet the governments 8 min call to scene responce time this does not get the patient transported to specialist care any quicker.
    This also ticks the managers financial box as it costs less to have a one man car crew than it does to have a two man ambulance saving in labour and asset aquirement. (Good management ey, Government say yey, I say nay!)

    Within the hospital trust's another classic example of good/bad management is the government's 4 hour A&E turn around. Do you really always get seen in that time?

    The consept seems great, everyone hates waiting around particularly when in pain and frightend. The fact is that there is no more resources to achieve this so it must be acomplised in some other manner. The solution across most of the country has been to utilise Clinical Descision units (CDU) often built into exisiting A&E units. If you are approaching the 4 hours and the clinicians are not sure what you (ie further tests, admission to hospital or a referal to another service such as social or psychiatric) then you will be moved into CDU. Seen and out of A&E in 4 hours, Management/government say yes, I say, not always what the numbers suggest!

    This pressure obviously has a knock on effect as there is occasionally a pressure to discharge patients quickly to free up more beds to take the load off A&E/CDU. Whilst this has only in EXTREMELY RARE cases proven to be unsafe there are many where patients do not feel psychologically or emotionally ready to leave. This sadly has no impact on the government statistics and targets sheet.

    I was present during one of the QCC inspections who criticised the department I was working in that day exclaiming how chaotic the enviroment was and how disorganised it seemed and I could agree. It was an increadably busy day with lots of very sick people, many needing the attention of three or more professionals so yes it will appear chaotic with that many people, the main issue I hold is not one of the inspectors actually bothered to ask any staff what was actually happening!

    I wonder what the next great policy will be and how many new managerial and private consultants will be required to action it!

    If only they'd stop wasting time & money and actually ask the patients and clinicians (the people who are directly affected by this) what they really need and how to make it work!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by hannah, bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 2:44PM

    “its not always the ambulance services fault, what about the time wasters who call an ambulance for no good reasons.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Gary, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 11:59AM

    “It is unfortunate that these statistics do not always reflect the truth regarding the patients' experience. As someone involved in Paramedic Education and Training, I know that ambulance service paramedics are amongst the best in the world and are continually striving for new techniques and best practice in clinical care. Also, through family illnesses, I have been an occasional user of the ambulance service and they have always been quick, caring and efficient; all that you need at a difficult time.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Paul, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 11:21AM

    “No complaints about the Ambulance service and paramdeics from me. Think the do an amazing job under very hard circumstances.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Toger, Avon

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 10:59AM

    “Oh dear BEP....

    You seem to have forgotten to publish the overall rating for GWAS!

    Was this an intentional mistake so you could carry out your usual round of ambulance bashing?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Billy Ambulance, Avon

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 10:56AM

    “I see that yet again BEP is on an Ambulance Service bash to sensationalise a story.

    I notice from the story that there is NO MENTION of overall ranking, services or finances for GWAS unlike the other trusts featured in the story!

    Surely it can't be that hard for BEP to report a story correctly.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Brian, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 10:27AM

    “Nothing but praise for Ambulance Crews,salt of the earth.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Anon, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 9:37AM

    “"GWAS chairman Tony FitzSimons said: "Last year was a time of great change. Many changes in the second half of the year are now resulting in faster response times and other improvements."

    He means the new computer dispatch system, which went live Sep 09 and still to this day has "issues".

    The interim chief executive, Anthony Marsh, said if he could have, he would have postponed/delayed the new system - alas, he came in too late....”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Steve, Bristol

    Thursday, October 15 2009, 8:09AM

    “I've only seen two callouts in the last year. In the first, a car crash, the ambulance were there in 5 minutes, the police took 15-20 as they were busy with the usual friday night stuff. The other, a bike under a lorry, we had paramedics and ambulance within 3 minutes”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters