Bristol City's Colin Sexstone baffled at Rugby World Cup snub

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

Bristol City chief executive Colin Sexstone is baffled as to why Bristol has been overlooked as a match venue should England's bid to host the 2015 Rugby World Cup prove successful, writes Steve Cotton.

Sexstone says it is "almost inconceivable" that no matches will be played in the city should the Rugby Football Union win the right to host the tournament.

The RFU presented its bid to the International Rugby Board in Dublin yesterday – and seven club football grounds were included. But while Anfield (Liverpool), Old Trafford (Manchester United), Emirates Stadium (Arsenal), St James' Park (Newcastle), Ricoh Arena (Coventry), Elland Road (Leeds) and St Mary's (Southampton) are all on the list, there is no place for Bristol City's new 30,000-seater stadium at Ashton Vale, which is due to be open long before the tournament kicks off.

And Sexstone said: "We have never been approached by the RFU at any stage, so we didn't know they were bidding to host the 2015 Rugby World Cup until we read about it in the papers.

"As soon as we saw it, we wrote a letter to them informing them we will have a 30,000-seater stadium in Bristol by then and we would be very interesting in staging something, as we did in 1999.

"But still we have heard nothing back. It seems almost inconceivable they haven't included Bristol, because if you are talking about rugby hotbeds, Bristol and Bath are among the major rugby areas in the country."

Ashton Gate hosted a pool match when the World Cup came to England in 1999, a Jonah Lomu-inspired New Zealand beating Tonga 45-9 in front of 21,000 spectators.

12
Tweet this article
Report

12 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Jim, Cardiff, ex-Bristol

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 3:46PM

    “Grow up Jon.

    The Millennium stadium is (proposed to) be used, which I acknowledged is odd given that it's an 'English' world cup bid. I also said some of the smaller games should be played at the new or existing BCFC stadium. How is that relating to Cardiff being precious?

    Finally, Bristol is more of a rugby city than Coventry IMO, and certainly more so than Southampton, hence my view that it is odd to choose those places over Bristol.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by john, briz

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 3:16PM

    “@ Jim Cardiff

    You clearly don't know what you are talking about if you say Coventry isn't rugby orientated.
    Its also at least the same size as your precious Cardiff.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Nikki, Blaise

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 12:11PM

    “After the fuss that Bristol City kicked up about not letting Bristol Rugby groud-share as they didn't want rugby played on their precious ground, why would the RFU offer them extra income by asking them to host matches. As much as I would love to have matches in Bristol, I don't think it's a suitable stadium. I would prefer the money went to Rugby clubs.
    Now what about a few matches at the Mem!!!!!”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by mancgas, mere

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 11:17AM

    “in other shock news, the new trashton will not be considered for the inauguration of Charles as King of England, a venue for the Olympic sailing events, or the World beach volley ball championships. Sexton build it first them try to host things. As a merekat says "simples"”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Rugger, Bristol

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 11:11AM

    “What is Mr Seckston on about? Why on earth would the RFU base their bid on non-existant (or even applied for) facilities?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article